Classic Pup 2.14X -- Updated 2 series

A home for all kinds of Puppy related projects

What is the best Puppy Version ever, LOL

2.14x
11
29%
2.14x
4
11%
2.14x
11
29%
Other: 2.14x only
12
32%
 
Total votes: 38

Message
Author
Dewbie

#4161 Post by Dewbie »

@BongoPlayer: The 2.6.18.1 kernel that 2.14x is built with might not be compatible with your computer.

If you're looking for something that will run on a wide variety of hardware and modems with long-term support, you might want to try Wary 5.0 and/or 5.1.1: http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/dis ... ns/quirky/
Each is built with a different kernel.

tempestuous
Posts: 5464
Joined: Fri 10 Jun 2005, 05:12
Location: Australia

#4162 Post by tempestuous »

Foroweb wrote:Vandor 0x7d1
ProductID 0x3c7
I cannot find reference to this USB device ID anywhere. I suspect you made a typographical error; it should be:
Vendor 0x7d1
Product ID 0x3c07
If so, the updated rt73 driver I provided is definitely compatible.
Foroweb wrote:Hi, install the driver in my laptop, but the device not work
Ah, are you sure you installed the driver?
The driver dotpet I provided, like all dotpets, is installed simply by single-clicking it in the ROX file browser. Nothing more.
Now you just need to reboot, and the DWA-110 device should be automatically detected, and the new rt73 driver will automatically load.
When you run the Network Wizard you should then see a new network interface, which you set up the wifi connection details for.

If this new interface fails to be created, or it's there and fails to work, it's possible that you have previously attempted to manually load a different driver, or worse, use a Windows driver with ndiswrapper. In such cases, there will a conflict and the device won't work. The best thing to do is delete your pupsave file, and do a clean boot to Puppy 214X. Then install the updated rt73 driver again.

eternal-sunshine
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2011, 00:13

#4163 Post by eternal-sunshine »

I would say off the top of my head its a kernel issue, 2.14X uses an older kernel, hmmm have you tried any of the 2 series like 2.17, a few pages back there was a few post about updating the same kernel version number with a newer sfs from 4 series, likely the newer kernel 2.6.18.8 from woof series 2 could backport the sata modules. I have a few sata desktop drives and they are found by 2.14X. But I don't have any laptops that have sata drives. So it would be impossible to test. This weekend when I'm not working I'll give it a shot and see.
ttuuxxx
Hi ttuuxxx
I wondered if you managed to have a look at this at the weekend and came to any conclusions.
Thanks

User avatar
clarf
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 19:22
Location: The old Lone Wolf

#4164 Post by clarf »

Hi ttuuxxx,

Is there hope to have a new metacity package with composite manager added for the next 214X-Top version?.

Maybe something like the one you posted here for Lucid:
. It looks nice.

Thank you
clarf

BongoPlayer
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun 28 Feb 2010, 06:12
Location: Canada

#4165 Post by BongoPlayer »

Dewbie wrote:@BongoPlayer: The 2.6.18.1 kernel that 2.14x is built with might not be compatible with your computer.

If you're looking for something that will run on a wide variety of hardware and modems with long-term support, you might want to try Wary 5.0 and/or 5.1.1: http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/dis ... ns/quirky/
Each is built with a different kernel.
Thanks Dewbie.

jp
Asus K7V, AMD Athlon, 256MB RAM, ATI AGP 3DRage IIC,
HL-DT-ST-8400B (40x12x40), Lexmark OptraE+
Modem: PCI, ES2898S/ES2818P (ES56T-PI)
Hard Drives: Maxtor (3GB) & Maxtor (1.96GB)
USB Pen Drive (8GB)
OS: Puppy Linux 4.3.1 (k2.6.30.5) Live CD

Foroweb
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri 18 Feb 2011, 03:26

#4166 Post by Foroweb »

tempestuous wrote:
Foroweb wrote:Vandor 0x7d1
ProductID 0x3c7
I cannot find reference to this USB device ID anywhere. I suspect you made a typographical error; it should be:
Vendor 0x7d1
Product ID 0x3c07
If so, the updated rt73 driver I provided is definitely compatible.
Hey, you are right again, I have a typographical error, the correct ProductID is 0x3c07, thank you very much for your help. I will try to run a new puppy sesion and install the driver.

User avatar
ttuuxxx
Posts: 11171
Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
Contact:

#4167 Post by ttuuxxx »

MinHundHettePerro wrote:
eternal-sunshine wrote:Hello ttuuxxx,
I tried using pup 2.17 and it worked, that is it recognised my sata drive in the laptop. As I said all other pups I have tried based on 412, 431, 520 recognise the laptop drive except your 214X. It's a real shame as I so dearly wanted to use 214X in this machine. Is there anything that can be done?
Thank you.
Hello :)!
Pup217.1 had K2.6.21.5, while pup214[R|X] has K2.6.18.1. I just checked (with my less knowledgeable tinkering mind :shock:) the kernel config for K2.6.18.1 and couldn't see any obvious module needed for SATA being excluded from pup214's kernel (save for backports), libpata (sata-pata) is enabled and all the (at the time) available sata drivers are enabled.

I dunno, perhaps it'd be possible to dump the K2.6.21.5 (including the initrd modules) onto 214X :? :? :shock: :oops: :P :).

FWIW & Cheers :)/
MHHP
Lol I tried that one before, It sort of worked, but wasn't stable enough, really there must be a better work around for it.
hmmm maybe he open a terminal in 2.14X and type lsmod
and then do it in 2.17 and see which module isn't loading
oh ya 3 most post and I'll hit 10,000. wow took a few years :) I think everyone who hits 10,000 post on here should get a free puppy cd in mail :)
ttuuxxx
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)

User avatar
ttuuxxx
Posts: 11171
Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
Contact:

#4168 Post by ttuuxxx »

clarf wrote:Hi ttuuxxx,

Is there hope to have a new metacity package with composite manager added for the next 214X-Top version?.

Maybe something like the one you posted here for Lucid:
. It looks nice.

Thank you
clarf
Hi clarf
I'll try to compile it but I'm not too sure if composites will work on 2.14X, being that it uses the older Xorg, but hey I'll give it a shot

ps 2 more post 10,000
ttuuxxx
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)

User avatar
ttuuxxx
Posts: 11171
Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
Contact:

#4169 Post by ttuuxxx »

well since this is my #1 thread I like to part in, I made myself a award for 10,000 post, I've been eying it for the past 6 months now and well here ya go, and its been a great Privilege building/fixing puppy related things and basically getting to know a great bunch of people, :) Thanks for your years of support I couldn't of done it without you guys. :)
ttuuxxx
Attachments
10000.jpg
(8.13 KiB) Downloaded 950 times
award.gif
(86.82 KiB) Downloaded 953 times
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#4170 Post by James C »

Congrats on making it to 10,000 posts ................ :)

User avatar
Aitch
Posts: 6518
Joined: Wed 04 Apr 2007, 15:57
Location: Chatham, Kent, UK

#4171 Post by Aitch »

....I made myself a award for 10,000 post...
Nice one, ttuuxxx

Image

A VERY well deserved award!

Thanks for all you've done/achieved :D

....and thanks for hanging in there through the hard times :wink:

Aitch :)

nancy reagan
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu 22 Jan 2009, 14:20

Thanks and

#4172 Post by nancy reagan »

James C wrote:Congrats on making it to 10,000 posts ................ :)
Thanks and up to your 100.000 th ?

User avatar
MinHundHettePerro
Posts: 852
Joined: Thu 05 Feb 2009, 22:22
Location: SE

Re: Thanks and

#4173 Post by MinHundHettePerro »

nancy reagan wrote:
James C wrote:Congrats on making it to 10,000 posts ................ :)
Thanks and up to your 100.000 th ?
Nah, nance, let's celebrate him on a linear scale, next time at 20k :) :) :) :). Your logarithmic step will only set his post-rate to go off exponentially :P :P :D.

Happy 10k, ttuuxxx :D :D :D :D !!!!

Cheers :)/
MHHP
[color=green]Celeron 2.8 GHz, 1 GB, i82845, many ptns, modes 12, 13
Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz, 1 GB, nvidia quadro nvs 285[/color]
Slackos & 214X, ... and Q6xx
[color=darkred]Nämen, vaf....[/color] [color=green]ln -s /dev/null MHHP[/color]

eternal-sunshine
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2011, 00:13

#4174 Post by eternal-sunshine »

ttuuxxx , MHHP and others:
MinHundHettePerro wrote:
eternal-sunshine wrote:
Hello ttuuxxx,
I tried using pup 2.17 and it worked, that is it recognised my sata drive in the laptop. As I said all other pups I have tried based on 412, 431, 520 recognise the laptop drive except your 214X. It's a real shame as I so dearly wanted to use 214X in this machine. Is there anything that can be done?
Thank you.
Hello !
Pup217.1 had K2.6.21.5, while pup214[R|X] has K2.6.18.1. I just checked (with my less knowledgeable tinkering mind ) the kernel config for K2.6.18.1 and couldn't see any obvious module needed for SATA being excluded from pup214's kernel (save for backports), libpata (sata-pata) is enabled and all the (at the time) available sata drivers are enabled.

I dunno, perhaps it'd be possible to dump the K2.6.21.5 (including the initrd modules) onto 214X .

FWIW & Cheers /
MHHP


Lol I tried that one before, It sort of worked, but wasn't stable enough, really there must be a better work around for it.
hmmm maybe he open a terminal in 2.14X and type lsmod
and then do it in 2.17 and see which module isn't loading
oh ya 3 most post and I'll hit 10,000. wow took a few years I think everyone who hits 10,000 post on here should get a free puppy cd in mail
ttuuxxx
Not really sure who this is aimed at but I see ttuuxxx says
maybe he open a terminal in 2.14X and type lsmod
and then do it in 2.17 and see which module isn't loading
Well if I am "he" then as I wrote above I can't try that as 214X just wont load at all.
I appreciate this is not the top laptop in the World but there are loads of them in the UK and who knows elsewhere. And it's just with 214X not 217, 412, 431, 520, other linux distros etc etc that I have this issue. Which is such a shame.

I am willing to help all I can to sort this problem out but I can't do what I can't do if it wont even recognise my sata drives.

I do appreciate that this is all a volunteers' project but if I am wasting my time please just say so as I note that ttuuxx has many irons in the fire and he posts less and less here. Perhaps 214X has seen its time?

But hopefully not.

User avatar
ttuuxxx
Posts: 11171
Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
Contact:

#4175 Post by ttuuxxx »

eternal-sunshine wrote:
I do appreciate that this is all a volunteers' project but if I am wasting my time please just say so as I note that ttuuxx has many irons in the fire and he posts less and less here. Perhaps 214X has seen its time?

But hopefully not.
No it hasn't reached near its end, not even close, I plan on keeping this puppy version for a few more years, maybe 3-5. :)
I just venture off a bit and help other puppy versions out and then come back again. :)
I'm still trying to figure it out.
ttuuxxx
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#4176 Post by James C »

eternal-sunshine wrote:
I would say off the top of my head its a kernel issue, 2.14X uses an older kernel, hmmm have you tried any of the 2 series like 2.17, a few pages back there was a few post about updating the same kernel version number with a newer sfs from 4 series, likely the newer kernel 2.6.18.8 from woof series 2 could backport the sata modules. I have a few sata desktop drives and they are found by 2.14X. But I don't have any laptops that have sata drives. So it would be impossible to test. This weekend when I'm not working I'll give it a shot and see.
ttuuxxx

FWIW,I just booted 214x Top6 in my Windows 7/PCLOS/Lucid 520 desktop with SATA drives and everything is detected here as well.

User avatar
tater
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat 29 May 2010, 18:13
Location: Michigan, USA

#4177 Post by tater »

Hi ttuuxxx,

I tried running 214x on my old p4 1.7 box, but my nvidia gforce2 gts locks up on me very shortly after I get a desktop. I have the same problem with most all the puppies with this card. I got wary 5 going by having the 71.86.14 driver ready to install immediately upon the desktop loading up, otherwise everything locks up tight and am forced to do a hard reset. Same story with this nvidia card on all the puppies I've tried thus far. With the driver it's rock solid, stable.

I'll have to wait for the devX for 214x to become available and see if I can compile the driver. I do want to learn how to do that for sure. Or maybe you or someone could point me to the .pet already compiled for this kernel version?

I'd be much obliged for a point in the right direction. :)

I like what I've been able to see in 214x. It seems quite fast!

Peace

tempestuous
Posts: 5464
Joined: Fri 10 Jun 2005, 05:12
Location: Australia

#4178 Post by tempestuous »

MU provided an automated installer for the 3D nVidia vendor driver, compatible with Puppy versions 2.12-2.16 back in late 2006 -
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=13114
This includes an older version of the nVidia driver, but it should be fine for a GeForce2.

User avatar
tater
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat 29 May 2010, 18:13
Location: Michigan, USA

#4179 Post by tater »

tempestuous wrote:MU provided an automated installer for the 3D nVidia vendor driver, compatible with Puppy versions 2.12-2.16 back in late 2006 -
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=13114
This includes an older version of the nVidia driver, but it should be fine for a GeForce2.
Thanks tempestuous, I'll give that a try.

eternal-sunshine
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2011, 00:13

#4180 Post by eternal-sunshine »

ttuuxxx wrote
I'm still trying to figure it out.
ttuuxxx
Thanks for that. Appreciated.

James C wrote
FWIW,I just booted 214x Top6 in my Windows 7/PCLOS/Lucid 520 desktop with SATA drives and everything is detected here as well.
It also works okay in my other rig with sata drives. It's just this laptop where I am having problems.
As I said before all other linuxs including puppy 217, 412, 431, 520 recognise the sata drive except 214X. So my logic says it has to be something peculiar to how 214X is built.

Post Reply