HI, folks.
As for me, it finally worked. I had indeed forgotten to make the thing executable...
But it seems that the sizes are 24, 128 and 128 pixels.
The original ROX has a progression : 24, 32, 48 pixels (or maybe 24, 48, 64 pixels? I can't remember.)
Would it be possible to have a progression like 24, 64 and 128 pixels?
Anyway, thanks for your trouble. With the 128 pixels size now available in ROX,
you almost don't need an actual picture viewer.
BFN.
musher0
Icon size on pinbioard
Bat'n 500! As for sizing- sure.. If someone can tell me about this bit in pixmaps.h..
Figuring the middle would work straight up, I didn't bother adjusting the huge value.
If I had to guess, I suspect the 'update SMALL_IMAGE_THRESHOLD' is GTK related..
The build was quick'n dirty, kind of a proof-of-concept for me.
Code: Select all
/* If making the huge size larger, be sure to update SMALL_IMAGE_THRESHOLD!
#define HUGE_WIDTH 96
#define HUGE_HEIGHT 96
#define ICON_HEIGHT 128
#define ICON_WIDTH 128
#define SMALL_HEIGHT 18
#define SMALL_WIDTH 22
* When a MaskedPixmap is created we load the image from disk and
* scale the pixbuf down to the 'huge' size (if it's bigger).
* The 'normal' pixmap and mask are created automatically - you have
* to request the other sizes.
/*
If I had to guess, I suspect the 'update SMALL_IMAGE_THRESHOLD' is GTK related..
The build was quick'n dirty, kind of a proof-of-concept for me.
Hi, Semme.
This is what I mean by the "progression" of icon sizes in the regular ROX-Filer.
The three sizes are controlled by the magnifying glass icon with a "+" sign in it.
The smaller size is very handy for regular viewing of folders, and should stay.
But the other two sizes could each be upped a notch, I think.
Is that feasible? Thanks in advance.
Please forgive me for not having been more precise in my previous messages.
Have a great day!
musher0
This is what I mean by the "progression" of icon sizes in the regular ROX-Filer.
The three sizes are controlled by the magnifying glass icon with a "+" sign in it.
The smaller size is very handy for regular viewing of folders, and should stay.
But the other two sizes could each be upped a notch, I think.
Is that feasible? Thanks in advance.
Please forgive me for not having been more precise in my previous messages.
Have a great day!
musher0
- Attachments
-
- regular_rox-3_sizes.jpg
- I had to scale down the image, but this should still give you an idea of the "progression" in icon size in ROX.
- (69 KiB) Downloaded 214 times
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
Musher- if we knew how to update (the) SMALL_IMAGE_THRESHOLD, then either of us could compile to suit.
I see. We'll leave at that, then. Thanks for the info.Semme wrote:Musher- if we knew how to update (the) SMALL_IMAGE_THRESHOLD, then either of us could compile to suit.
m0
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)