BIT METER OS 0.7.6 (stable) & 0.8.0 (experimental)
- Mike Walsh
- Posts: 6351
- Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
- Location: King's Lynn, UK.
My, you have all been busy bees while I've been to the seaside today....!
@Geoffrey:-
Goodness me; I shall to have to turn my back on things a bit more often if this is what happens in my absence...! That's marvellous, Geoff. How certain are we that this will run OK in the Pups you've tried it in?
@ gcmartin:-
As stated in the original post, there are 64-bit versions of both 0.7.6 AND 0.8.0. However, obviously no development work will go on with those if nobody's yet tried them. We need testers for the 64-bit versions. Install them (taking all necessary precautions, of course) from the .deb file; note what happens.....then give us all some feedback! That's what's needed.
What work has been done so far is all on 32-bit 'Pups', for the simple reason, I expect, that there's more of them in general use by the community. That in turn, is also for the simple reason that 64-bit came along after 32-bit; so in terms of what elderly hardware is in use, I think there would naturally be a higher proportion of 32-bit systems. As stated, I'm NOT a programmer, or 'coder'. I did, however, bring this to the community's notice because I genuinely believe that it does have a place for many Puppy users.
I don't have any 64-bit Pups myself to try them out in. Although I have a 64-bit system (AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+), I've always preferred to run 32-bit Puppies, for the simple reason that they run so fast.....and I'm not too keen on the likes of FatDog, et al. That's not to say that kirk & jamesbond haven't done some absolutely marvelous work with them; it's just not my cup of tea. I've tried FatDog 700 in the past; didn't get on too well with it....
I am, however, considering giving Slacko64 a try, so.....we'll see.
Anyway, it's just my bit to contribute to the community, since I enjoy Puppy so much. The 'dev' work, however, will of necessity have to come from other interested parties...who know what they're doing! (I don't mind admitting I'm very much a 'noob' at present.) Oscar, Geoffrey & mikeb have done some sterling work on this already.....
Regards,
Mike.
@Geoffrey:-
Goodness me; I shall to have to turn my back on things a bit more often if this is what happens in my absence...! That's marvellous, Geoff. How certain are we that this will run OK in the Pups you've tried it in?
@ gcmartin:-
As stated in the original post, there are 64-bit versions of both 0.7.6 AND 0.8.0. However, obviously no development work will go on with those if nobody's yet tried them. We need testers for the 64-bit versions. Install them (taking all necessary precautions, of course) from the .deb file; note what happens.....then give us all some feedback! That's what's needed.
What work has been done so far is all on 32-bit 'Pups', for the simple reason, I expect, that there's more of them in general use by the community. That in turn, is also for the simple reason that 64-bit came along after 32-bit; so in terms of what elderly hardware is in use, I think there would naturally be a higher proportion of 32-bit systems. As stated, I'm NOT a programmer, or 'coder'. I did, however, bring this to the community's notice because I genuinely believe that it does have a place for many Puppy users.
I don't have any 64-bit Pups myself to try them out in. Although I have a 64-bit system (AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+), I've always preferred to run 32-bit Puppies, for the simple reason that they run so fast.....and I'm not too keen on the likes of FatDog, et al. That's not to say that kirk & jamesbond haven't done some absolutely marvelous work with them; it's just not my cup of tea. I've tried FatDog 700 in the past; didn't get on too well with it....
I am, however, considering giving Slacko64 a try, so.....we'll see.
Anyway, it's just my bit to contribute to the community, since I enjoy Puppy so much. The 'dev' work, however, will of necessity have to come from other interested parties...who know what they're doing! (I don't mind admitting I'm very much a 'noob' at present.) Oscar, Geoffrey & mikeb have done some sterling work on this already.....
Regards,
Mike.
Last edited by Mike Walsh on Wed 13 May 2015, 21:15, edited 3 times in total.
That's my fault, I had a mishap with the properties on the drive, it don't seem to have been detrimental.mikeb wrote:Just noticed the pet has everything as root.
I might make another and see if it works the same with the ftp ownership, though maybe better to let sleeping dogs lie.
Only if someone with a 64bit version of Puppy packages the bitmeteros_0.8.0-amd64.deb, I don't have a 64bit version to try it on.gcmartin wrote: Will there be a separate utility for 64bit PUPs or will the 32bit morph into 64bit as well?
[b]Carolina:[/b] [url=http://smokey01.com/carolina/pages/recent-repo.html]Recent Repository Additions[/url]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
yes let the dogs lie... I was actually wanting to make it all root anyway.
Sometimes i find packages with odd permissions and sometimes it causes problems...in this case i suspect its not intentional or necessary.
Well all good progress
been fiddling with Thunar of all things so left this on the side for a little anyway.
mike
Sometimes i find packages with odd permissions and sometimes it causes problems...in this case i suspect its not intentional or necessary.
Well all good progress
been fiddling with Thunar of all things so left this on the side for a little anyway.
mike
I think it should work ok, they were booted with no save file, installed the pet, run bitmeter from the menu and worked without a hitch.Mike Walsh wrote: How certain are we that this will run OK in the Pups you've tried it in?
I packaged the 64 bit version for gcmartin to test, changed all the files to "root" ownership, waiting a report
[b]Carolina:[/b] [url=http://smokey01.com/carolina/pages/recent-repo.html]Recent Repository Additions[/url]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
Tested results
Installed with no reports of issues to LxPUP64 and on an old nonsupported version of PUPPY Chubby. Both showed the Menu>Network>BM as seen in 32bit, and both would launch the browser to localhost:... But, in each case, the browser port would not open to BM's local page port 2605.
Edit: Lighthouse and its derivatives (Chubby is one of them) will install a ".deb" file. The deb works where the pet did not launch.
Installed with no reports of issues to LxPUP64 and on an old nonsupported version of PUPPY Chubby. Both showed the Menu>Network>BM as seen in 32bit, and both would launch the browser to localhost:... But, in each case, the browser port would not open to BM's local page port 2605.
Edit: Lighthouse and its derivatives (Chubby is one of them) will install a ".deb" file. The deb works where the pet did not launch.
Last edited by gcmartin on Wed 13 May 2015, 23:27, edited 2 times in total.
@gcmartin
I'm posting from wary64-6.99, bitmeteros-0.8.0-amd64.pet is working ok for me.
I'm posting from wary64-6.99, bitmeteros-0.8.0-amd64.pet is working ok for me.
Did not launch? from the menu or the pet didn't install? well if the deb works just use it or make a unedited pet from it.Edit: Lighthouse and its derivatives (Chubby is one of them) will install a ".deb" file. The deb works where the pet did not launch.
- Attachments
-
- capture3483.png
- bitmeteros-0.8.0-amd64 running in wary64-6.99
- (50.68 KiB) Downloaded 351 times
[b]Carolina:[/b] [url=http://smokey01.com/carolina/pages/recent-repo.html]Recent Repository Additions[/url]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
The PET installs with no message of any issues on both systems. And, Menu items are created in Network.
Also, on Chubby (when the DEB is used), I can search and find BM while on LxPUP64 I cannot find the BM task after Menu launch, even though a tab (which doesnt connect ) spawns on the LxPUP64 browser. Thus, something is causing it to fail when the PET is used.
I will try another 64bit PUP; namely EmSee's Ultra.
Edit1: I found my EmSee Sugar DVD and booted it. After FirstRUN, I insure WAN was active and installed the PET. Same as before on the 2 other 64bit PUPs.
P.S. No firewall active at any time during any of these tests on the PCs.
I apologize as this can mislead. To rephrase: The deb allows the browser to spawn to port properly where the pet did not spawn a browser which connects to the port. The PET's browser tab shows page not found while the DEB's browser tab in Chubby launches the tab as expected when started.GCMartin wrote:... The deb works where the pet did not launch.
Also, on Chubby (when the DEB is used), I can search and find BM while on LxPUP64 I cannot find the BM task
Code: Select all
pidof bmcapture
I will try another 64bit PUP; namely EmSee's Ultra.
Edit1: I found my EmSee Sugar DVD and booted it. After FirstRUN, I insure WAN was active and installed the PET. Same as before on the 2 other 64bit PUPs.
P.S. No firewall active at any time during any of these tests on the PCs.
Last edited by gcmartin on Thu 14 May 2015, 02:14, edited 3 times in total.
gcmartin, I'm downloading LxPup64-15.03.01-hybrid, hopefully it will work, if not I'll sort it out, it could be the ownership I changed , I'm sure I can make it work, here's hoping .
[b]Carolina:[/b] [url=http://smokey01.com/carolina/pages/recent-repo.html]Recent Repository Additions[/url]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
Got it working in lxpup64, it was a path problem with /usr/lib64, in wary64 the /usr/lib is a symlink to /usr/lib64 that's why it worked.
Download it again and try bitmeteros-0.8.0-amd64.pet
The pinstall now looks like so
This script looks in /usr and get the first instance of the file which in the 64bit version will be in /usr/lib64
I updated the 32 bit version, the only difference is it checks if libpcap.so.0.8 is present, if not creates it.
Download it again and try bitmeteros-0.8.0-amd64.pet
The pinstall now looks like so
Code: Select all
LIBPCAP=`find /usr -type f -name 'libpcap.so.*' | head -n 1`
LINK_PATH=${LIBPCAP%/*}
if [ ! -f "$LINK_PATH/libpcap.so.0.8" ]; then
ln -s "$LIBPCAP" "$LINK_PATH"/libpcap.so.0.8
fi
cp /var/lib/bitmeter/bitmeter.db.new /var/lib/bitmeter/bitmeter.db
/etc/init.d/bitmeterweb start
/etc/init.d/bitmeter start
I updated the 32 bit version, the only difference is it checks if libpcap.so.0.8 is present, if not creates it.
Last edited by Geoffrey on Thu 14 May 2015, 19:40, edited 1 time in total.
[b]Carolina:[/b] [url=http://smokey01.com/carolina/pages/recent-repo.html]Recent Repository Additions[/url]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
- Mike Walsh
- Posts: 6351
- Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
- Location: King's Lynn, UK.
- Mike Walsh
- Posts: 6351
- Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
- Location: King's Lynn, UK.
No need to reply on this one, Geoffrey; I've just answered my own question.
Posting now from Slacko64 5.9.1, & bitmeteros-0.8.0-amd64.pet is working beautifully; no problems detected yet.
Thank you, Geoffrey. Much appreciated. Looks like I can add a few more to the 'working list'. I think I'd best list 32-bit & 64-bit separately, though; might get a bit confusing otherwise. Cheers!
Regards,
Mike.
Posting now from Slacko64 5.9.1, & bitmeteros-0.8.0-amd64.pet is working beautifully; no problems detected yet.
Thank you, Geoffrey. Much appreciated. Looks like I can add a few more to the 'working list'. I think I'd best list 32-bit & 64-bit separately, though; might get a bit confusing otherwise. Cheers!
Regards,
Mike.
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot.png
- (60.31 KiB) Downloaded 340 times
- Mike Walsh
- Posts: 6351
- Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
- Location: King's Lynn, UK.
Much appreciated, Michael. No rush, old son; as & when.
Remember...'slow & steady'. My life-long motto has always been; if something's worth doing, do it once, do it properly...and then you're finished with it. Nothing I hate more than having to go back and keep putting things right. Take as long as you need for testing.
Wish somebody had thought to remind my old man of that fact.....
Cheers.
Mike to Mike.
Remember...'slow & steady'. My life-long motto has always been; if something's worth doing, do it once, do it properly...and then you're finished with it. Nothing I hate more than having to go back and keep putting things right. Take as long as you need for testing.
Wish somebody had thought to remind my old man of that fact.....
Cheers.
Mike to Mike.
too true...quick fixes are not in the long run...playing boats reminds me of that one.Remember...'slow & steady'. Laughing My life-long motto has always been; if something's worth doing, do it once, do it properly...and then you're finished with it. Nothing I hate more than having to go back and keep putting things right.
Sometimes I leave a problem for a week or three and surprising how much better the solution becomes.
Good thing you grabbed some seaside...today it was woolly hat and gloves time. You went to yarmouth or somewhere closer?
I threw a pile of leftover seeds on the garden yesterday...figured the rain would do the rest.... my attempts to get things to germinate is very hit and miss... might be the random cold nights.
There...I thought it was my turn to drift off...well actually take a right turn at Timbuktu
I also never noticed before how many nautical expressions there are in the English language... and it sneaks into plenty of songs too...
ok inflate thy chest and go forth
mike
- Mike Walsh
- Posts: 6351
- Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
- Location: King's Lynn, UK.
No, we decided to go to Cromer for the afternoon; home of the famous 'Cromer crabs'...
Don't really know why we bothered. Nice enough in the sun, but there was a fresh nor'-easterly blowing on-shore yesterday. Out of the sun it was bloody freezing.
I remembered why I hadn't been to Cromer for years & years. 'Cos it's dead.....absolutely nothing to do there, and you haven't even got a proper beach....it's all shingle & pebbles.
And it's a neck-breaking trip from the top of the cliff to the seafront! Must be a 1 in 3 slope all the way down. Whoever said Norfolk was flat doesn't know what they're wittering on about...
Mike 2 Mike.
Don't really know why we bothered. Nice enough in the sun, but there was a fresh nor'-easterly blowing on-shore yesterday. Out of the sun it was bloody freezing.
I remembered why I hadn't been to Cromer for years & years. 'Cos it's dead.....absolutely nothing to do there, and you haven't even got a proper beach....it's all shingle & pebbles.
And it's a neck-breaking trip from the top of the cliff to the seafront! Must be a 1 in 3 slope all the way down. Whoever said Norfolk was flat doesn't know what they're wittering on about...
Mike 2 Mike.
I downloaded the 0.8.0 version onto LxPupTahr-15.03
I had to edit:
/var/lib/bitmeter/runweb.sh
to get it to pickup defaultbrowser
I used sns to make a wifi connection.....bitmeteros didn't see the connection or any traffic - see screenie.
Check dependencies doesn't indicate any missing lib problems.
Wonder what I'm doing wrong??
I had to edit:
/var/lib/bitmeter/runweb.sh
to get it to pickup defaultbrowser
I used sns to make a wifi connection.....bitmeteros didn't see the connection or any traffic - see screenie.
Check dependencies doesn't indicate any missing lib problems.
Wonder what I'm doing wrong??
- Attachments
-
- bitmeteros.png
- (96.3 KiB) Downloaded 360 times
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
peebee, check the task manager to see if bmcapture running, if not run /etc/init.d/bitmeter start in the terminal.
I'm downloading LxPupTahr-15.03.1-pae.iso so I'll try it in that and see what the problem is.
Weird that it didn't start the default browser.
I'm downloading LxPupTahr-15.03.1-pae.iso so I'll try it in that and see what the problem is.
Weird that it didn't start the default browser.
[b]Carolina:[/b] [url=http://smokey01.com/carolina/pages/recent-repo.html]Recent Repository Additions[/url]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ahfade8q4def1lq/signbot.gif[/img]
Hi GeoffreyGeoffrey wrote:peebee, check the task manager to see if bmcapture running, if not run /etc/init.d/bitmeter start in the terminal.
I'm downloading LxPupTahr-15.03.1-pae.iso so I'll try it in that and see what the problem is.
Weird that it didn't start the default browser.
I should have made clear I was using the .deb from the developers webpage not your pet......I also hadn't realised how many posts there'd been on this thread since I first looked at it....
Thanks - yes I had checked the Task Manager and both the daemons seemed to be running....
"defaultbrowser" is not in the list that is looked for.....3 variations on www-browser and firefox
Cheers
peebee
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64