New!! Samba-4.1.8.pet (15 June 2014)

[stemsee]

Can someone please test this as I don't have any shares. Default compile options = nothing specified.

Samba-4.1.8.pet @15MB
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4GhZV ... edit?usp=1


EDIT: re-compiled on dpup wheezy

please test ... @15mb
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4GhZV ... edit?usp=1

[gcmartin]

32bit or 64bit PUPs, which?

[stemsee]

32bit

[rcrsn51]

Can someone please test this as I don't have any shares.

That's what a Samba server package does - it creates shares.

[gcmartin]

Attempted installation on Slacko570. Couple issues:

• installation location for execution
• library needs
• Menu needs

Shown below:

Code: Select all

# smbd --version
bash: smbd: command not found
# samba --version
bash: samba: command not found
# find /  -name "*smbd*"
find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for `/mnt/NAS2' (saw only st_nlink=2 but we already saw 0 subdirectories): this may be a bug in your file system driver.  Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option.  Earlier results may have failed to include directories that should have been searched.
/usr/local/samba/lib/private/libsmbd_shim.so
/usr/local/samba/lib/private/libsmbd_conn.so
/usr/local/samba/lib/private/libsmbd_base.so
/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/samba3/smbd.so
/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd
/initrd/pup_rw/usr/local/samba/lib/private/libsmbd_shim.so
/initrd/pup_rw/usr/local/samba/lib/private/libsmbd_conn.so
/initrd/pup_rw/usr/local/samba/lib/private/libsmbd_base.so
/initrd/pup_rw/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/samba3/smbd.so
/initrd/pup_rw/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd
# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd  -V
/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd: error while loading shared libraries: libbsd.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
#

Also tried this on EmSee-V2 and current SAMBA 3.6 is taken precedence. Thus new PET is not replacing current.

Just a note: When SAMBA installs on an existing PET, it needs to replace ALL installed SAMBA modules including the client modules that ship with most 32bit PUPs. I'm not exactly sure how 01Micko and Shinobar are doing so, but can only guess that it may be done in replacement, or system's pathing, or in symbolic links. This way all utilities which use SAMBA (client or otherwise) will be consistent within system operations. This would reduce developer/testers/user problem resolution of any component which makes use of SAMBA's facilities in the system.

Advise

[stemsee]

Thanks @gcmartin !

anyone else - sarcasm belongs to the dark side!!

[Moose On The Loose]

Can someone please test this as I don't have any shares. Default compile options = nothing specified.

Samba-4.1.8.pet @15MB
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4GhZV ... edit?usp=1

I have 528. I'll test it on my systems tonight

[stemsee]

I have 528. I'll test it on my systems tonight

that's great. Keep in mind the missing dependency indicated by gcmartin

[Moose On The Loose]

I have 528. I'll test it on my systems tonight

that's great. Keep in mind the missing dependency indicated by gcmartin

I didn't get any message about that. All I got was nothing at all.
It looks like you dont have the right directory structure in there. You don't have the init.d scripts. You do have a whole lot of stuff that looks like it isn't needed. Nothing is in the search path.

[stemsee]

I compiled from source and performed dir2pet! Clearly I will need to recompile specifying configure options system-i386 or something along those lines. Thanks for your feedback.

[stemsee]

EDIT: re-compiled on dpup wheezy

please test ... samba-4.1.8.pet @15mb
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4GhZV ... edit?usp=1