Latest Java runtime (jre-*.sfs) files - get 'em here
The JAVA library tree and Puppy Linux
Great instructions from @ScsiJon highlighting the need for a standard consistent library structure across PUP distros to make upgrades simple and easy.
I have often wondered if debian and slackware place JAVA using the same library tree? Or is there placements consistent with Oracle presentation of JAVA tree structure the same? And, is that consistent with OpenJAVA library tree?
If so, PUP's job for JAVA and upgrades would become simple.
I have often wondered if debian and slackware place JAVA using the same library tree? Or is there placements consistent with Oracle presentation of JAVA tree structure the same? And, is that consistent with OpenJAVA library tree?
If so, PUP's job for JAVA and upgrades would become simple.
jre-1.8u65-i586.sfs
Hi,
I uploaded jre-1.8u65-i586.sfs
Download from
http://www.smokey01.com/gjuhasz/packages/
Tested on Puli with games such as Minecraft.
Have fun!
Regards,
gjuhasz
Edit: I corrected the above link because I moved my packages from smokey01.com/gjuhasz/sfs to here. The folder behind the obsolete link includes a pointer to the actual storage place. Sorry for the inconvenience.
I uploaded jre-1.8u65-i586.sfs
Download from
http://www.smokey01.com/gjuhasz/packages/
Tested on Puli with games such as Minecraft.
Have fun!
Regards,
gjuhasz
Edit: I corrected the above link because I moved my packages from smokey01.com/gjuhasz/sfs to here. The folder behind the obsolete link includes a pointer to the actual storage place. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Last edited by gjuhasz on Tue 10 Nov 2015, 11:31, edited 2 times in total.
Re: jre-1.8u65-i586.sfs
Thanks gjuhasz, but could you please check the page? 404 error.
- Attachments
-
- 404 error.jpg
- (173.33 KiB) Downloaded 924 times
Re: jre-1.8u65-i586.sfs
It was my fault.Kicalaf wrote:could you please check the page? 404 error.
Yesterday, I moved my packages from smokey01.com/gjuhasz/sfs to the below link, which is OK now:
http://www.smokey01.com/gjuhasz/packages/
The folder behind the old link includes a pointer to the new one. I also edited my previous posts to correct the link.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Have fun!
Regards,
gjuhasz
64-bit java runtime package
I created a 64-bit java runtime package jre-8u65-x64.pet and successfully tested with various complexity of java-based apps such as Calculator, Hudoku and Minecraft.
Uploaded to http://www.smokey01.com/gjuhasz/packages.
Have fun!
Regards,
gjuhasz
Uploaded to http://www.smokey01.com/gjuhasz/packages.
Have fun!
Regards,
gjuhasz
- Attachments
-
- Minecraft-Tahr64-jre1.8u65.jpg
- (64.8 KiB) Downloaded 976 times
Re: jre-1.8u65-i586.sfs
Much obliged mateygjuhasz wrote: It was my fault.
Yesterday, I moved my packages from smokey01.com/gjuhasz/sfs to the below link, which is OK now:
http://www.smokey01.com/gjuhasz/packages/
sfs downloaded without trouble
sfs downloaded without trouble. Topic JRE opened in french forum forum francophone ici
Makagiga is really a nice ToDolist and graphism now is acceptable by our speedy Puppy Linux. .
JRE8u45Lin-i586.sfs: 53 M
Lot of JRE applications have alternative in our forum or PPM without using JRE. OSMO has been a nice todolist, by default in Puppy Menu for ... a long time
Will Makagiga replace it ? NO !
Makagiga is really a nice ToDolist and graphism now is acceptable by our speedy Puppy Linux. .
JRE8u45Lin-i586.sfs: 53 M
Lot of JRE applications have alternative in our forum or PPM without using JRE. OSMO has been a nice todolist, by default in Puppy Menu for ... a long time
Will Makagiga replace it ? NO !
Last edited by Pelo on Sun 10 Apr 2016, 20:45, edited 1 time in total.
Hello all.
Here's where to download the most recent (as of this writing) java JRE 1.8.77 32-bits,
as an sfs archive : -- https://www.adrive.com/public/uspehr/jr ... x-i586.sfs --
The hashes are as follows:
# MD5
6b45b3ac304b89f83dc31230af62e055 jre-8u77-linux-i586.sfs
# SHA1
f51ff8b0b48dcfde03b1514be16091b0ac20c763 jre-8u77-linux-i586.sfs
Enjoy!
Here's where to download the most recent (as of this writing) java JRE 1.8.77 32-bits,
as an sfs archive : -- https://www.adrive.com/public/uspehr/jr ... x-i586.sfs --
The hashes are as follows:
# MD5
6b45b3ac304b89f83dc31230af62e055 jre-8u77-linux-i586.sfs
# SHA1
f51ff8b0b48dcfde03b1514be16091b0ac20c763 jre-8u77-linux-i586.sfs
Enjoy!
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
Hi boxR.
As a pet file? Yikes!
Make sure your pupsave has lots of free room, then. At least 189 Mb's.
Otherwise, use my sfs archive, referenced two posts above. That's why I made this
java JRE as an sfs, not as a pet.
Best regards.
As a pet file? Yikes!
Make sure your pupsave has lots of free room, then. At least 189 Mb's.
Otherwise, use my sfs archive, referenced two posts above. That's why I made this
java JRE as an sfs, not as a pet.
Best regards.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
Thanks @BoxR. This is just what I needed for a current PUP distro. I need permanence that a PET provides in the running system. I use folder-based save-sessions when saving to permanent storage.
I do understand how to use SFSs, but, much of what I do intends permanent deployment in as simple a click-to-permanent-install approach as possible. This is the other reasons I use PETs.
No offense to anyone!
I do understand how to use SFSs, but, much of what I do intends permanent deployment in as simple a click-to-permanent-install approach as possible. This is the other reasons I use PETs.
No offense to anyone!
Hello gc.gcmartin wrote:Thanks @BoxR. This is just what I needed for a current PUP distro. I need permanence that a PET provides in the running system. I use folder-based save-sessions when saving to permanent storage.
I do understand how to use SFSs, but, much of what I do intends permanent deployment in as simple a click-to-permanent-install approach as possible. This is the other reasons I use PETs.
No offense to anyone!
I'll pretend that I'm not offended !!!
Equating the installation of a pet archive with permanence is a false argument! Sfs
archives can be just as permanent -- provided you don't remove them every 10 minutes!
My point in my post above was pupsave population. You need a very big pupsave to
install the pet archive of a java JRE (+/- 189 Mb's). If you don't have a big pupsave file,
you have to increase its size first. Whereas the size of your pupsave file does not matter
if you load the sfs of it.
As to using a pupsave folder instead of a pupsave file, my opinion is that it's not "Puppy"
to use one: it's a corruption of orthodox Puppy religion! I don't know who suggested
that pupsave folder aberration, but (s)he should be denied the last rites when (s)he
abandons Puppy!!!
The fact of the matter is: a pupsave file is much easier to back-up, manage and
export than a pupsave folder.
I hope this clears matters. BFN.
Last edited by musher0 on Sun 10 Apr 2016, 17:25, edited 1 time in total.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
The subject is of great interest
"Whereas the size of your pupsave file does not matter
if you load the sfs of it. " says Musher. and it opens lot of new roads,
The subject is of great interest
Once last version JRE installed, try aTunes ! nice jukebox.
if you load the sfs of it. " says Musher. and it opens lot of new roads,
The subject is of great interest
Once last version JRE installed, try aTunes ! nice jukebox.
- Attachments
-
- AtunesOrange.jpg
- (63.2 KiB) Downloaded 620 times
Last edited by Pelo on Thu 11 Aug 2016, 06:08, edited 2 times in total.
Hi musher0,
If I offended you in any way, I don't understand why and it was not my intention.
I usually install Puppy in complete mode to get my old computer faster. So I prefer to use PET files rather than SFS. It's just my preference, don't be disappointed or vexed about it.
You can have another preference as well, it satisfies me !
Thanks for sharing and for what you're doing on this forum !!!
If I offended you in any way, I don't understand why and it was not my intention.
I usually install Puppy in complete mode to get my old computer faster. So I prefer to use PET files rather than SFS. It's just my preference, don't be disappointed or vexed about it.
You can have another preference as well, it satisfies me !
Thanks for sharing and for what you're doing on this forum !!!
A JAVA for every PC platform
The best part of last couple of days is that users have current solutions that supports which-ever approach they choose for their JAVA installation.
For both 32bit and for 64bit PCs, The Puppy Community has
For both 32bit and for 64bit PCs, The Puppy Community has
- current SFSs,
- current PETs, and
- a JAVA update utility for those who already have JAVA installed.
No, boxR, you have not offended me, I was just my natural grumpy self!boxR wrote:Hi musher0,
If I offended you in any way, I don't understand why and it was not my intention.
I usually install Puppy in complete mode to get my old computer faster. So I prefer to use PET files rather than SFS. It's just my preference, don't be disappointed or vexed about it.
You can have another preference as well, it satisfies me !
Thanks for sharing and for what you're doing on this forum !!!
(Which I hide most of the time!)
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
jre-1.8u91-i586.sfs
Hi,
I uploaded jre-1.8u91-i586.sfs
Download from
http://www.smokey01.com/gjuhasz/packages/
Tested on Puli.
Have fun!
Regards,
gjuhasz
I uploaded jre-1.8u91-i586.sfs
Download from
http://www.smokey01.com/gjuhasz/packages/
Tested on Puli.
Have fun!
Regards,
gjuhasz