QEMU 1.53 (32 bit) / 2.0.0 (64 bit)

Virtual machines, emulation, etc.
Message
Author
User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#16 Post by mikeb »

nope...was qemu-system-x86_64

And just to be clear I was running lighthouse 64 as the host.

mike

jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

#17 Post by jamesbond »

Okay, so you're saying that LH64 is host, but trying to run LH64 inside qemu-system-x86 doesn't work? Hmmm...

Which version of qemu do you use? 1.6.0 is buggy, I've tested it with 1.2.2, 1.5.3 and 1.6.2 all works fine here.

Anyway, what's the error?
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#18 Post by mikeb »

running qemu 64 1.5.3 fails with no such file or directory...binary is there...path is correct.... I do not get to run any virtual machine.

mike

jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

#19 Post by jamesbond »

Did you ldd the binary? perhaps missing dependency?
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#20 Post by mikeb »

hmm not really a ldd error but I could double check...seems more likely the atom intel 64 support is lacking.

Not sure when I will have access to the machine to test on next...though seems ok working blind for now on the gui...

Thanks for your input on this...

mike

User avatar
Whitesnow
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue 20 Nov 2007, 19:18
Location: Italy

#21 Post by Whitesnow »

mikeb wrote:Will the change at dyndns ...ie paid option only..affect your hosting?
I'm not sure what you mean, but if you concern about reaching files on my repository, nothing will change.

Please, note that my old packages will periodically overwritten by the new ones. So, please do it a backup if you interesting in some of those ones.
[b][i][color=darkred][size=134]*.* Snow *.*[/size][/color][/i][/b] :wink:

vanchutr
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat 05 Aug 2006, 12:04

#22 Post by vanchutr »

Is it really need "qemu" or another "virtual box"???
Now you can use easy2boot ... A method to boot iso (image). I think it works like others "virtual box". It easy to manage and can boot many ".iso files".

File to download: "Easy2Boot-grub4dos_v0.5.zip" (this is an old package). It is easy to use. (You can use latest package!)

User avatar
Whitesnow
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue 20 Nov 2007, 19:18
Location: Italy

QEMU 64 bit package added, info updated

#23 Post by Whitesnow »

I updated repository and first post. Take a look for new QEMU 64 bit.
[b][i][color=darkred][size=134]*.* Snow *.*[/size][/color][/i][/b] :wink:

gcmartin

Tested in FD630 and LH64-602b and Slacko64

#24 Post by gcmartin »

Tested V2.0 PET following example in the Guide. Works in LH64. Also, works in FD630 & Slacko64, too.

Code: Select all

#  qemu-system-x86_64 -version
QEMU emulator version 2.0.0, Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
Here to help.

Edited: The distros with consistent successful tests using V2.0.0
Last edited by gcmartin on Wed 14 May 2014, 04:38, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
neerajkolte
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon 10 Feb 2014, 07:05
Location: Pune, India.

V2.0.0 sfs in Fatdog64-630

#25 Post by neerajkolte »

Hi Whitesnow,

I have tested latest qemu 2.0.0 SFS in Fatdog64-630. It works Nicely.

Thanks.
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson

“We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.â€￾
- Amara’s Law.

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#26 Post by mikeb »

Just to round up the problems I was having...turned out LHP was not loading the sfs to tmpfs correctly due to a change in the output of free ...so not an issue with this sfs but LHP 64 so after a manual sfs load it worked just fine.

mike

Post Reply