LxPup-by-SFS (LXDE)
ThinSlacko
ThinSlacko5.5.01 ONLY has a missing library and therefore needs the A.5.5.3-SFS plus the attached augmented pet which includes this missing library.
Cheers
peebee
Cheers
peebee
- Attachments
-
- lxpupsetup-1.3-ts.pet
- Special augmented pet for ThinSlacko 5.5.01 ONLY
- (26.51 KiB) Downloaded 1846 times
Last edited by peebee on Fri 10 May 2013, 16:54, edited 7 times in total.
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
LxPup by SFS for Precise 5.5
[EDIT]6-apr-13 new version uploaded[/edit]
To transform Precise 5.5 into LxPup-by-SFS-5.5 download the B-SFS to be found at the following link:
md5: cfdbdf6bd1c445fcf3f2fc526902c54a lxpup-by-sfs_B.5.5.2.sfs 11.8MB ... plus this pet 1.3MB
Install as described in post #1
The pet is bigger for this version (too big to be an attachment) as I found I needed to install some libraries that way to make it work.
The B-SFS uploaded 6-apr-13 includes the latest pcmanfm-1.1.0 and also pup-volume-monitor-0.1.11
Cheers
PeeBee
To transform Precise 5.5 into LxPup-by-SFS-5.5 download the B-SFS to be found at the following link:
md5: cfdbdf6bd1c445fcf3f2fc526902c54a lxpup-by-sfs_B.5.5.2.sfs 11.8MB ... plus this pet 1.3MB
Install as described in post #1
The pet is bigger for this version (too big to be an attachment) as I found I needed to install some libraries that way to make it work.
The B-SFS uploaded 6-apr-13 includes the latest pcmanfm-1.1.0 and also pup-volume-monitor-0.1.11
Cheers
PeeBee
- Attachments
-
- capture18397.png
- (177.28 KiB) Downloaded 20548 times
Last edited by peebee on Sun 14 Apr 2013, 17:41, edited 2 times in total.
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Worked like a champ peebee in Slacko 5.5. I will try it in Upup. I think it would be good if Upup used LXDE, that would provide something new and some distinction from Slacko, but I doubt that its likely. Thanks much.
Reasons for LXDE (primarily for appeal to new Puppy users):
More modern look and feel
Easier for user to customize
Working Recycle/Trash system
Graphic application menu in pcmanfm
Reasons for LXDE (primarily for appeal to new Puppy users):
More modern look and feel
Easier for user to customize
Working Recycle/Trash system
Graphic application menu in pcmanfm
Hi Larryplaydayz wrote:Worked like a champ peebee in Slacko 5.5. I will try it in Upup. I think it would be good if Upup used LXDE, that would provide something new and some distinction from Slacko, but I doubt that its likely. Thanks much.
Reasons for LXDE (primarily for appeal to new Puppy users):
More modern look and feel
Easier for user to customize
Working Recycle/Trash system
Graphic application menu in pcmanfm
Thanks for the report, your views mean a lot - I agree with all your comments and would add:
- Much improved integration with remote filesystems
I've been using the Slacko version pretty continuously since I made it and haven't stumbled over any show-stopper problems.
As I say in post #1 - it was inspired by Jerome's pioneering work and I could never have achieved anything without following his example.
Cheers
Peter
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Version A.5.5.2 with pup-volume-monitor 0.1.11
Version A.5.5.2 of the SFS for Slacko and Upup-Precise is now available in post #1 - the only difference in this version is the 0.1.11 version of pup-volume-monitor is included.
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
New version A.5.5.3
UPDATED 28-jul-2013
pet version 1.4-s has better menu management
UPDATED 13-jun-2013
New version for
Slacko 5.5 (normal or Thin from 5.5.03 or Phat versions) + Slacko 5.6beta
or
Upup Precise 3.8.3
md5: 9cea116870657e792c1999259d1ae10b lxpup-by-sfs_A.5.5.3.sfs - 11.5MB
Load the SFS + the PET and follow the steps in post #1
Main change is version 0.1.14 of Pup-Volume-Monitor
Cheers
PeeBee
pet version 1.4-s has better menu management
UPDATED 13-jun-2013
New version for
Slacko 5.5 (normal or Thin from 5.5.03 or Phat versions) + Slacko 5.6beta
or
Upup Precise 3.8.3
md5: 9cea116870657e792c1999259d1ae10b lxpup-by-sfs_A.5.5.3.sfs - 11.5MB
Load the SFS + the PET and follow the steps in post #1
Main change is version 0.1.14 of Pup-Volume-Monitor
Cheers
PeeBee
- Attachments
-
- lxpupsetup-1.4-s.pet
- Updated pet 28-jul-2013
- (18.4 KiB) Downloaded 1663 times
-
- lxpupsetup-1.3.pet
- PET for version A.5.5.3
- (11 KiB) Downloaded 1824 times
Last edited by peebee on Thu 08 Aug 2013, 20:04, edited 17 times in total.
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
My apologies to the first person who downloaded the pet above - if they downloaded the sfs as well, hopefully they worked out it was the wrong link - now corrected.
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Version for Precise Puppy 5.7
UPDATED 28-jul-2013 - pet updated for Precise 5.7 to version 1.4-u with better menu management
To transform Precise 5.7.1
into LxPup-by-SFS-5.5 download the B-SFS to be found at the following link:
md5: cea7122aac9ea89615b221dd7b759f4d lxpup-by-sfs_B.5.5.3.sfs - 11.8MB ... plus this lxpupsetup-1.4-u.pet 0.6MB
Install as described in post #1
The -u pet is bigger (too big to be an attachment) as I found I needed to install some libraries that way to make it work.
Cheers
PeeBee
13-jun-13 update= new versions of lxsession and pup-volume-monitor
29-jun-13 update= added PupControl to B sfs and included it in the panel for easy access
28-jul-13 update=new pet version for better menu management
To transform Precise 5.7.1
into LxPup-by-SFS-5.5 download the B-SFS to be found at the following link:
md5: cea7122aac9ea89615b221dd7b759f4d lxpup-by-sfs_B.5.5.3.sfs - 11.8MB ... plus this lxpupsetup-1.4-u.pet 0.6MB
Install as described in post #1
The -u pet is bigger (too big to be an attachment) as I found I needed to install some libraries that way to make it work.
Cheers
PeeBee
13-jun-13 update= new versions of lxsession and pup-volume-monitor
29-jun-13 update= added PupControl to B sfs and included it in the panel for easy access
28-jul-13 update=new pet version for better menu management
Last edited by peebee on Sat 03 Aug 2013, 06:16, edited 16 times in total.
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
superceded by post lower down
Last edited by peebee on Sat 04 May 2013, 16:17, edited 1 time in total.
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Re: Version for Precise Puppy and Upup Raring
Works OK.peebee wrote: LxPup-by-SFS-5.5 download the B-SFS to be found at the following link:
md5: f34653bddd2f6c8636e8c4f9762d09a4 lxpup-by-sfs_B.5.5.3.sfs - 11.8MB ... plus this lxpupsetup-1.3-u.pet 0.6MB
I was just wondering if there is any reason for all the folders in the SFS to have 777 permissions.
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==
Version for Upup-Raring 3.9.9
UPDATED 28-jul-2013
pet version 1.5r has better menu management
UPDATED 13-jun-2013
05-jul-13 - Also works for Upup-Raring 3.9.9.1
Pemasu has announced a new version of Upup-Raring 3.8.7.
This new version has pup-volume-monitor 0.1.13 built-in.
To add LxPup-by-SFS to this new version use this sfs:
md5: f19fdc564341bc66cba130eba5fc16e6 lxpup-by-sfs_R.5.5.4.sfs 12.2MB
plus the LxPupSetup-1.5.r pet attached to this post.
Cheers
peebee
pet version 1.5r has better menu management
UPDATED 13-jun-2013
05-jul-13 - Also works for Upup-Raring 3.9.9.1
Pemasu has announced a new version of Upup-Raring 3.8.7.
This new version has pup-volume-monitor 0.1.13 built-in.
To add LxPup-by-SFS to this new version use this sfs:
md5: f19fdc564341bc66cba130eba5fc16e6 lxpup-by-sfs_R.5.5.4.sfs 12.2MB
plus the LxPupSetup-1.5.r pet attached to this post.
Cheers
peebee
- Attachments
-
- lxpupsetup-1.5-r.pet
- version 1.5-r pet 28-jul-2013
- (91.25 KiB) Downloaded 1717 times
-
- lxpupsetup-1.4-r.pet
- LxPupuSetup pet for use with R.5.5.4 sfs
- (88.12 KiB) Downloaded 1810 times
Last edited by peebee on Sun 28 Jul 2013, 12:54, edited 19 times in total.
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Re: Version for Precise Puppy and Upup Raring
Not intentional - suspect its a side effect of my laptop having an NTFS formatted hard disk (I think).....not sure how I can change.mavrothal wrote:Works OK.
I was just wondering if there is any reason for all the folders in the SFS to have 777 permissions.
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
peebee, firstly, your sfs works. Thanks for that, tested with PHATSlacko.
Now, for a bit of constructive criticism and a suggested remedy.
I think you know my feelings toward NTFS and mixing it with Linux in general.
Having the 777 permissions could be bad for a number of reasons I won't go into. You are absolutely right pointing the finger at NTFS. It should be called "OTFS". . It has never respected Linux permissions.
You'll be happy to know there is a simple work around. It's like creating a "dummy" save file except any install of Linux can access it.
Here is a rough "howto" to create one.
1. Mount your NTFS partition (defragged already of course) and change directory into it. I wouldn't use a windows system partition but you can if you want, at own risk.
2. Now you can make a file to house our Linux filesystem.This produces a file of 512M named linux.ext4 on your NTFS partition. Multiples of 131072
(128M) are probably good, seeing as though we are building largish sfs files and you do need a bit of clearance.
3. Make the filesystem.That makes an ext4 filesystem but you could make ext2, 3, whatever you want.
4. Mount it... or just click it in rox. (Correction: You would need the name to end in "4fs" to click in rox, you can do that if you wish)
You can do whatever you like in there.. compile, package, you name it. As a warning, don't be tempted to resize it, bad idea when the NTFS filesystem becomes fragmented. No guarantee that a defrag would help either.
Now, for a bit of constructive criticism and a suggested remedy.
I think you know my feelings toward NTFS and mixing it with Linux in general.
Having the 777 permissions could be bad for a number of reasons I won't go into. You are absolutely right pointing the finger at NTFS. It should be called "OTFS". . It has never respected Linux permissions.
You'll be happy to know there is a simple work around. It's like creating a "dummy" save file except any install of Linux can access it.
Here is a rough "howto" to create one.
1. Mount your NTFS partition (defragged already of course) and change directory into it. I wouldn't use a windows system partition but you can if you want, at own risk.
2. Now you can make a file to house our Linux filesystem.
Code: Select all
dd if=/dev/zero of=linux.ext4 bs=1024 count=524288
(128M) are probably good, seeing as though we are building largish sfs files and you do need a bit of clearance.
3. Make the filesystem.
Code: Select all
mkfs.ext4 -q -m 0 -F linux.ext4
4. Mount it.
Code: Select all
mkdir -p /mnt/linuxfs
mount linux.ext4 /mnt/linuxfs -o loop
You can do whatever you like in there.. compile, package, you name it. As a warning, don't be tempted to resize it, bad idea when the NTFS filesystem becomes fragmented. No guarantee that a defrag would help either.
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access
LxPup SFS
Just wanted to add my thanks to Peter. I have loaded the SFS in Slacko 5.5. This was an existing system which already had a few packages installed, so a save file existed to begin with. No matter, everything installed without problems and so far has been rock solid. I am familiar with Puppy and like the way the existing Puppy menu structure and icons have been integrated into LXDE. There's nothing wrong with ROX/JWM and they have a reassuring feel which comes from years of familiarity, but I have become aware when using Puppy alongside other people who have (e.g) Windows 7/Vista or for that matter Ubuntu/Mint, that the look of the desktop is dated and for this reason LXDE is a real 'nice to have'. I am very confident defending my use of Puppy on a production machine, even in an office environment (and my machine is modern enough to run Windows 7 when I want to) but I prefer not to have to defend an old-fashioned desktop appearance when the real reasons to use Puppy are nothing to do with that!
Hi Mick01micko wrote:peebee, firstly, your sfs works. Thanks for that, tested with PHATSlacko.
Now, for a bit of constructive criticism and a suggested remedy.
Many thanks for both the feedback and advice.
I have bitten the bullet and reformatted my hard disk to ext4 and deleted all traces of Windows at the same time.
What should I do now to reset the file permissions changed by NTFS? Is there even any simple way to do such a thing??
Cheers
peebee
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Works decently in slacko 5.5-4g (at least with openbox to sit on). The lovely lxpanel menu plugin (with comments as popups for dotdesktop items!) may need a bit of tweaking for my needs (specifically to have my 'usual' top-tier category icons in other wms besides openbox). Also modify a few subcats although the shell, texteditor and multimedia(2) work nicely for me. Nothing "missing" from the lxpanel menu, as far as mine goes - it's very good about updating itself
A few things reverted from my non-pristine (maybe 1/2 dozen dotdesktops and my modified .xinitrc that makes rox pinboard on-demand only). Likely openbox tweaks as well to get back a functional r-click openbox rootmenu and etc. Gonna have to fix the font size in pcmanfm (using 'new standard' 96dpi rather than the old standard 78 ), but otherwise that fm seems a bit quicker and more stable than previous incarnation.
Good Work, peebee (and Jejy69 for the initial base)
"simple way to do such a thing??" - dunno, my simple is to simply drudge through stuff
A few things reverted from my non-pristine (maybe 1/2 dozen dotdesktops and my modified .xinitrc that makes rox pinboard on-demand only). Likely openbox tweaks as well to get back a functional r-click openbox rootmenu and etc. Gonna have to fix the font size in pcmanfm (using 'new standard' 96dpi rather than the old standard 78 ), but otherwise that fm seems a bit quicker and more stable than previous incarnation.
Good Work, peebee (and Jejy69 for the initial base)
"simple way to do such a thing??" - dunno, my simple is to simply drudge through stuff
Installed on Upup Precise (IIRC it's 3831 -- the iso claims to be 382 tho). Very nice... but with one small issue.
I gotta have the drive icons, and I don't see a way to enable them (or any other icons, for that matter...). Going through Pmount every time I plug in a flash drive is going to get very old very quickly
Also: I assume I can load the lxpup SFS at bootup through BootManager with no ill effects?
I gotta have the drive icons, and I don't see a way to enable them (or any other icons, for that matter...). Going through Pmount every time I plug in a flash drive is going to get very old very quickly
Also: I assume I can load the lxpup SFS at bootup through BootManager with no ill effects?
Hi Starhawkstarhawk wrote:Installed on Upup Precise (IIRC it's 3831 -- the iso claims to be 382 tho). Very nice... but with one small issue.
I gotta have the drive icons, and I don't see a way to enable them (or any other icons, for that matter...). Going through Pmount every time I plug in a flash drive is going to get very old very quickly
Also: I assume I can load the lxpup SFS at bootup through BootManager with no ill effects?
Drive icons appear in the left hand pane of the pcmanfm file manager so pmount is not needed....it is a slightly different way of working to jwm/rox but one that you get used to pretty quickly.
You could try adding desktop-drive-icons-0.0.5 if you really want them.
Loading the sfs with bootmanager works the same as sfs-on-the-fly - I'm not clear whether you mean loading the sfs but not the pet so that you can stay with jwm/rox with no ill-effects or something else? I don't think loading just the sfs should cause any problems - but I've not tested it exhaustively as I can't see why you would want to do it.
Rox is still available through the menu if you feel the need to use it - for instance to create links which pcmanfm can't do for some reason.
Cheers
peebee
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
The dotPET is installed (and therefore isn't going anywhere).
I meant BootMgr vs SFS-Load-On-The-Fly. I didn't know how similar they were, and the instructions explicitly state to use SFS-Load-On-The-Fly so I wasn't sure if BootMgr would muck things up or not.
Thanks for the dotPET for the drive icons, I'll report back here shortly to say whether or not it works.
I meant BootMgr vs SFS-Load-On-The-Fly. I didn't know how similar they were, and the instructions explicitly state to use SFS-Load-On-The-Fly so I wasn't sure if BootMgr would muck things up or not.
Thanks for the dotPET for the drive icons, I'll report back here shortly to say whether or not it works.