ArchPup 13.2.1
Version 13.2.1 is finished
Here is list of files for upload:
Here is list of files for upload:
Code: Select all
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 78M Feb 1 15:52 linux_3.4.28_src.sfs
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 73M Feb 10 13:48 archdev_132.sfs
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 142M Feb 10 14:16 archpup_13.2.1-20130210.iso
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 62 Feb 10 14:16 archpup_13.2.1-20130210.iso.md5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 70 Feb 10 14:17 archpup_13.2.1_minimal-20130210.iso.md5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 81M Feb 10 14:17 archpup_13.2.1_minimal-20130210.iso
Supersimargl8 wrote:Version 13.2.1 is finished
Here is list of files for upload:
Does it needs a new savefile or it can update 13.2?
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==
Hi simargl/simargl8,
Very glad to see that you are back with full steam
BTW, seems version 13.2.1 is still not uploaded to http://sourceforge.net/projects/archpup/files/13.2.1/. Found only the md5 files and the archlocale_132.sfs
Cheers.
Very glad to see that you are back with full steam
BTW, seems version 13.2.1 is still not uploaded to http://sourceforge.net/projects/archpup/files/13.2.1/. Found only the md5 files and the archlocale_132.sfs
Cheers.
[b][color=green]Success is never ending. ... Failure is never final![/color][/b]
[size=75][i](Used with kind permission from jejy69)[/i][/size]
[size=75][i](Used with kind permission from jejy69)[/i][/size]
Sim,
was wondering if there was a way the makesfs file could be modified to support multiple packages into one sfs file. presently if i do a:
the script will make 3 separate sfs files. would be nice if running that command would package all 3 into one sfs file.
was wondering if there was a way the makesfs file could be modified to support multiple packages into one sfs file. presently if i do a:
Code: Select all
makesfs clementine vlc opera
stifiling wrote:
You may have to put all the packages and their dependents in one folder and then run the script, say whilst in that folder.
I have been making large sfs modules using this and arch2sfs script. Check "help" in the menu for further clarification.
Hope this helps.
I think it already does thatwas wondering if there was a way the makesfs file could be modified to support multiple packages into one sfs file
You may have to put all the packages and their dependents in one folder and then run the script, say
Code: Select all
makesfs desired_sfs_name
I have been making large sfs modules using this and arch2sfs script. Check "help" in the menu for further clarification.
Hope this helps.
[b][color=green]Success is never ending. ... Failure is never final![/color][/b]
[size=75][i](Used with kind permission from jejy69)[/i][/size]
[size=75][i](Used with kind permission from jejy69)[/i][/size]
13.2.1 looks good.
lxrandr is a nice addition but will not stick after an X restart even if you save. I remember I had this issue with lxrandr in Slitaz too
Nice touch with locales too but the problem with /usr/bin/locale(def) remains. On a fresh boot (pupmode 5) I get
It turns out that you must have archdev.sfs loaded for locale(def) to be seen by the system.
I'm assuming it has to do with the splitting of glibc in the main sfs and the devx
Also you may want to maybe include the gettext package in archlocale.sfs. The gettext and gettext.sh included in the main sfs are not sufficient (and give a conflict when you try to install from the repo).
I also tried to get some office apps from the repo
Might worth trying a recompile.
lxrandr is a nice addition but will not stick after an X restart even if you save. I remember I had this issue with lxrandr in Slitaz too
Nice touch with locales too but the problem with /usr/bin/locale(def) remains. On a fresh boot (pupmode 5) I get
Code: Select all
[root@archpup ArchPup]# ls -l /usr/bin/locale*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 31860 Feb 9 10:56 /usr/bin/locale
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1044 Jan 27 06:31 /usr/bin/locale-gen
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 325700 Feb 9 10:56 /usr/bin/localedef
[root@archpup ArchPup]# locale -a
bash: /usr/bin/locale: No such file or directory
[root@archpup ArchPup]# localedef
bash: /usr/bin/localedef: No such file or directory
I'm assuming it has to do with the splitting of glibc in the main sfs and the devx
Also you may want to maybe include the gettext package in archlocale.sfs. The gettext and gettext.sh included in the main sfs are not sufficient (and give a conflict when you try to install from the repo).
I also tried to get some office apps from the repo
Code: Select all
#pacman -S gnumeric abiword
.......
Total Download Size: 59.84 MiB
Total Installed Size: 281.61 MiB
Might worth trying a recompile.
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==
I didn't notice that /usr/bin/locale is not working without devel sfs, which is not strange
because I have it always loaded...
Output of some commands
lddlibc4 is in the main SFS.
First I thought /usr/bin/locale might be python or perl script and requires them to be installed.
But it's not.
locale-gen script starts working after installing arch-dev-20130201.spkg, package that contains
development files from the main sfs.
It has 3.750 files, now only to discover which file(s) is required
I will attach files.list if you spot something let me know
because I have it always loaded...
Output of some commands
Code: Select all
[root@archpup ~]# locale -a
bash: /usr/bin/locale: No such file or directory
[root@archpup ~]# which locale
/usr/bin/locale
[root@archpup ~]# ldd /usr/bin/locale
/usr/bin/ldd: line 102: /usr/bin/lddlibc4: No such file or directory
not a dynamic executable
First I thought /usr/bin/locale might be python or perl script and requires them to be installed.
But it's not.
locale-gen script starts working after installing arch-dev-20130201.spkg, package that contains
development files from the main sfs.
It has 3.750 files, now only to discover which file(s) is required
I will attach files.list if you spot something let me know
- Attachments
-
- arch-dev-20130201.spkg-files.list.tar.gz
- (20.16 KiB) Downloaded 349 times
3750 are rather too many.simargl8 wrote: locale-gen script starts working after installing arch-dev-20130201.spkg, package that contains
development files from the main sfs.
It has 3.750 files, now only to discover which file(s) is required
I will attach files.list if you spot something let me know
But I looked at your arch-dev list instead.
binutils could be the one.
If not, is only 37 packages to install one at a time and check
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==
I've found it Problematic were glibc libraries, moved to /lib in main sfs otherwise system
couldn't boot, but also copied to /usr/lib in arch-dev otherwise compiling wouldn't work.
List of those files
Save this to file called list, and then
locale-def works, now to edit build script and test before uploading new iso file
couldn't boot, but also copied to /usr/lib in arch-dev otherwise compiling wouldn't work.
List of those files
Code: Select all
ld-2.17.so
ld-linux.so.2
libc-2.17.so
libc.so
libc.so.6
libdl-2.17.so
libdl.so
libdl.so.2
Code: Select all
for i in $(cat list);do ln -s /lib/$i /usr/lib/$i;done
systemd
thanks for your answer.
I try to obtain acpi but with a AMD processor (so, must be powernow-k8 or powernow-k7), and unfortunately all the wiki talk about systemctl to make this work.
Because certainly systemd and systemd-sysvcompat are both installed by default on installation media newer than 2012-10-13. (it is NOT a bad review for your work : it's just to explain it ).
So...I try to find !
I try to obtain acpi but with a AMD processor (so, must be powernow-k8 or powernow-k7), and unfortunately all the wiki talk about systemctl to make this work.
Because certainly systemd and systemd-sysvcompat are both installed by default on installation media newer than 2012-10-13. (it is NOT a bad review for your work : it's just to explain it ).
So...I try to find !
Noticed that the 16MB libxatracker is in the base.
If I understand correctly this is used exclusively for X acceleration in VMware.
Is it really needed?
If I understand correctly this is used exclusively for X acceleration in VMware.
Is it really needed?
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==