 |
Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com "THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in|
The time now is Tue 21 May 2013, 18:58 All times are UTC - 4 |
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Derivatives |
|
ArchPup - Puppy based on Arch Linux
Moderators: Flash, JohnMurga |
 
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Page 7 of 13 [195 Posts] | Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Next |
| Author | Message | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
cinclus_cinclus
Joined: 22 Feb 2009 Posts: 56 |
OK.
I'm afraid not: neither the intel nor the vesa are installed automatically. So for the moment I got a working solution with the following configuration (in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-monitor.conf):
I never got a problem before with an Xorg-Intel-driver on my MSI G45M Digital mobo on any other distribution (an exception was SALIX). |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||||||
mavrothal
 Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 1058 |
I do that in /root/.start and works ok but then in some case like issuing 'alsamixer -V all' I get "rxvt-unicode failed to open" 
Looks OK. I can not find it anymore in a fresh install 
_________________ Kids all over the world go around with an XO laptop. They deserve one puppy (or many) too  |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
stifiling
Joined: 29 Dec 2007 Posts: 387 |
@mavrothal thanks for that udev pet....it fixed the issue. i think it'll be helpful to users to remaster it...as well as /lib/firmware into the next release. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
puppyluvr
 Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 3053 Location: Chickasha Oklahoma |
Hello,
As we can see, my efforts to Woof a fully formed Archpup were in vain.. But a base release, with much user input, will eventually produce a fully functional Pup.. Hail to all involved.. This will be a most useful Pup, a revolution... Not a bit jealous that someone else got it started... 
Keep going, dont give up till this is a viable option to the Puppy world.. Awesome work... Much kudos... This could really be Puppy changing in terms of integrating pacman.. And some have already exported this to other Puppies... Aww.. Gotta love the Borg spirit in Puppy..... Feel good man.. You deserve it..... 
_________________ "Close the "Windows", and open your eyes, to a whole new world" http://puppylinuxstuff.meownplanet.net/puppyluvr/ http://theplpd.webs.com/ 
Nothing but Puppy since 2.15CE... |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
greengeek
Joined: 20 Jul 2010 Posts: 1184 Location: New Zealand |
Does the udev affect all wifi adapters do you think? or is it only for adapters hooked in via usb? |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
stifiling
Joined: 29 Dec 2007 Posts: 387 |
u know i haven't thoroughly tested it. the archpup i'm testing it on, is one that i switched the kernel to 3.2.8-ski....the saluki kernel. so using the udev pet posted above...and the saluki kernel, my wireless is working on all my machines the same as if i was using any other puplet. usb or builtin. but with the default Archpup kernel...i cannot say. but going off what "i think" though..."i think" it should work like it does with any other puppy....i really don't see a reason why it wouldn't. jus can't say 'for sure' yet. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
mavrothal
Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 1058 |
simargl, are aufs-utils included in the build? Could not find them anywhere. I could not also find aufs_type.h in the kernel headers and the one in the kernel source will not do.
_________________ Kids all over the world go around with an XO laptop. They deserve one puppy (or many) too |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
simargl
Guest |
It should be there:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
simargl
Guest |
So I got only one response on request for testing udev  . OK
See this linux-firmware-20121118.tar.xz in ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/linux-firmware/ It contains all linux firmware and needs only simple compressing to sfs module. I will leave that to interested users (if any). Today will make final update to version 1204 with new udev and some other stuff. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
mavrothal
Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 1058 |
It is in the kernel source sfs but not in /usr/include/linux where it should be. And just copying it over still fails (I do not have the compile error handy now). What kernel headers do you have in the dev-archpup.sfs? _________________ Kids all over the world go around with an XO laptop. They deserve one puppy (or many) too |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
simargl
Guest |
It is original linux-api-headers from Arch. I did not compile it, because glibc needs them and I thought that recompiling them could create some compatibility issues. You have list of files from that package here /var/lib/spkg/installed/linux-api-headers. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
mavrothal
Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 1058 |
It's a good idea the kernel headers to come from the kernel in use. For most user-space apps kernel headers make little difference so you should not be worried for this kind of packages. But kernel related stuff (drivers, fs etc) may not compile or compile but fail to work if build against a different kernel. So I would think to run linux-api-headers/PKGBUILD against your patched and configured kernel source and include this in the build. _________________ Kids all over the world go around with an XO laptop. They deserve one puppy (or many) too |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
slenkar
Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 129 |
yep that worked, Was that to test if I can use git? |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
simargl
Guest |
I tried to compile linux-api-headers and got this after make headers_check
It's definitely related to aufs, becuase without aufs patches it compiles fine. But how to fix this? Any ideas? @slenkar: Yes, that was for testing git, so if that works you can now use packer
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
mavrothal
Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 1058 |
I _think_ this may have to do with how you got, patched and packaged your source and not with the aufs code per se. Trying
These are sufficient to allow aufs-utils compilation. I attache the compiled utilities in case someone else wants to try them.
_________________ Kids all over the world go around with an XO laptop. They deserve one puppy (or many) too |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Page 7 of 13 [195 Posts] | Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Next |
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Derivatives |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum |
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group