Chromium v83 with pepper-flash **RUNS-AS-SPOT**

Browsers, email, chat, etc.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

chromium_38.0.2125.104 + pepperflash_15.0.0.189

#106 Post by peebee »

chromium_38.0.2125.104 + pepperflash_15.0.0.189

md5 from sf.net - click on the "i"

Repackaged from: http://slackware.org.uk/people/alien/sb ... /chromium/

Some things to note:

THIS VERSION WILL ONLY WORK ON "MODERN" PUPPIES - LxPup15+, LxTahrPup, Slacko6Beta2, TahrPup6.0

- may not work on older cpu's without SSE2

- may get "can't find libnss3.so" errors when run in terminal on systems with Firefox included when installed on ntfs partitions - try the fix pet above if this occurs but only if it seems to cause additional problems

- works on Slacko6/LxPup14.10 and on LxTahrPup but with differences in sandboxing - if you need fullest sandboxing you need to be running LxTahrPup with kernel 3.14.20 or LxPup14.10 pae version with same kernel 3.14.20. On k3.4.xx pups sandboxing will not be activated apart from SUID sandbox.
Last edited by peebee on Tue 09 Jun 2015, 06:02, edited 6 times in total.
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

giannis4
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri 28 Jun 2013, 13:26

#107 Post by giannis4 »

Is it working with Slacko 5.7 nonPAE? I have tried to start it from the terminal and I got this....

# chromium
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
#

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#108 Post by peebee »

giannis4 wrote:Is it working with Slacko 5.7 nonPAE? I have tried to start it from the terminal and I got this....

# chromium
/usr/lib/chromium/chromium: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found (required by /usr/lib/chromium/chromium)
#
'Fraid not - Slacko 5.7 is now too old for this version.....
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

giannis4
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri 28 Jun 2013, 13:26

#109 Post by giannis4 »

Ok, no problem. Thanks for the reply peebee.

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

chromium_38.0.2125.111+pepper_15.0.0.189

#110 Post by peebee »

32bit:
chromium_38.0.2125.111+pepper_15.0.0.189_lx.sfs

Caveats and constraints as detailed above
Last edited by peebee on Fri 13 Mar 2015, 09:45, edited 2 times in total.
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#111 Post by peebee »

There are reported serious problems with Chromium 38 when viewing YouTube videos - suggest roll-back to Chromium 37 if this is something you want to do.
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

chromium_38.0.2125.122+pepper_15.0.0.223

#112 Post by peebee »

32bit:
chromium_38.0.2125.122+pepper_15.0.0.223_lx.sfs

Caveats and constraints as detailed above

This version seems to have fixed the YouTube problems (tested on LxPup14.10 with both BBC iPlayer and YouTube).
Last edited by peebee on Fri 13 Mar 2015, 09:46, edited 2 times in total.
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

starhawk
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2010, 06:04
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

#113 Post by starhawk »

Using Chromium 37.xx from a post earlier in this thread. SFS version.

I'm on X-Slacko 2.2, frugal install to ext4. The command string (in both XFCE's panel/icon config and in the *.desktop file) is chromium --disk-cache-size=1 --media-cache-size=1, which (theoretically) keeps those caches to an absolute minimum.

Computer in question is a Dell Latitude E4310. i5-540M CPU, 4gb RAM (4009mb usable), 256gb ADATA SSD.

I've used this configuration on previous hardware (a Core2Duo desktop and an ASUS netbook) for some time and it was stable, but all of a sudden I keep getting either "Aw, Snap!" pages or the browser out-and-out crashes back to the desktop. Restore session or new session doesn't matter, it's not stable for long. Running in Terminal, it crashes with the extremely illuminating (NOT!) message of "bus error".

In the interests of giving as much info as possible, this started after a hard shutdown. I had copied some fonts into /usr/share/fonts and the system froze up for no reason -- even CTRL+ALT+BKSP wouldn't break it out, had to reboot with the manual override button (aka power switch).

For the record, the SFS is the same one as used on the desktop and netbook -- I archive my downloaded dotPETs and SFSes so that if I have to redo my savefile I don't have to waste minutes and megabytes tracking down what I stuck in there six months ago (half the time I can't even remember, so it's a good idea for that reason as well).

Any real graphic-heavy and/or flashy page will trigger the problem. eBay, other shopping sites, heck -- even a blog I like to visit reliably does it :(

I've unloaded/reloaded the SFS (on the same boot session tho) and that didn't fix it.

This is literally the first trouble I've had with it ever. Before this I was using your Chromium 31 dotPET (er, I think it was yours!) and it was similarly problem-free...

Suggestions?

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#114 Post by peebee »

starhawk wrote:Using Chromium 37.xx from a post earlier in this thread. SFS version.....
This is literally the first trouble I've had with it ever....Suggestions?
My first move would be to delete /root/.config/chromium completely and restart chromium from scratch.

Who and why has changed the command to chromium --disk-cache-size=1 --media-cache-size=1? The desktop file in the sfs does not have those values. I would suggest uninstall the sfs, reboot, delete any .desktop files remaining, then re-install the sfs.

If you want the chromium cache to not use savefile then it is better to link /root/.config/chromium to another location.

Cheers
peebee
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

starhawk
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2010, 06:04
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

#115 Post by starhawk »

*I* changed that command. Chromium works fine with it (or, rather, had until yesterday) and it keeps my savefile from filling up whenever I go on the 'Net. I'd really rather not muck with moving it -- while I have a 256gb SSD, only about 16gb of that is Puppy. (The rest is user-data storage so I don't lose everything to a corrupt savefile.)

starhawk
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2010, 06:04
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

#116 Post by starhawk »

Rebuilt my savefile on that system. Just finished.

I suspect that my problems were caused by a combination of two things --

(1) the previously mentioned hard-reboot possibly corrupting my savefile.

(2) the fact that I had run Chromium /without/ the extra command switches for a while.

I have a hunch it was trying to dip into cache that it no longer had (from before I put in the switches) and was crashing as a result. Can't prove it, but that's my theory, anyhow...

I'll use it for a while tonight. If I don't post about it after this, it's fixed and I forgot to report it as such ;) :P

starhawk
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2010, 06:04
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

#117 Post by starhawk »

I'm hesitantly saying this is solved. Time will tell for sure, but it ain't screwed up yet and that's an improvement.

Removed and reinstalled the SFS from backups, then booted from RAM and fsck'd all partitions on the drive. fsck swears they were clean but I have my doubts because it seems to be working now...

EDIT: yeah, definitely solved. No problems yet.

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

chromium_39.0.2171.65+pepperflash_15.0.0.223

#118 Post by peebee »

THIS VERSION WILL ONLY WORK ON "MODERN" PUPPIES - LxPup14.10, LxTahrPup, Slacko6Beta2, TahrPup6.0

32bit:
chromium_39.0.2171.65+pepper_15.0.0.223_lx.sfs

Caveats and constraints as detailed above
Last edited by peebee on Fri 13 Mar 2015, 09:46, edited 2 times in total.
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

chromium_39.0.2171.71+pepperflash_15.0.0.239

#119 Post by peebee »

THIS VERSION WILL ONLY WORK ON "MODERN" PUPPIES - LxPup14.10, LxTahrPup, Slacko6Beta2, TahrPup6.0

32bit:
chromium_39.0.2171.71+pepper_15.0.0.239_lx.sfs

Caveats and constraints as detailed above
Last edited by peebee on Fri 13 Mar 2015, 09:46, edited 1 time in total.
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

chromium_39.0.2171.95+pepper_16.0.0.235

#120 Post by peebee »

THIS VERSION WILL ONLY WORK ON "MODERN" PUPPIES - LxPup14.10, LxTahrPup, Slacko6Beta2, TahrPup6.0

32bit:
chromium_39.0.2171.95+pepper_16.0.0.235_lx.sfs

Caveats and constraints as detailed above
Last edited by peebee on Fri 13 Mar 2015, 09:47, edited 2 times in total.
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

Jude
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri 10 Oct 2014, 01:25

#121 Post by Jude »

Is there a version of Chromium for Lucid Puppy 528, I've been trying just about every suggestion on the forums and have gone all over the internet in search of one. Firefox updates itself making it a pleasure to use, but for those of us that aren't tech savvy what are we supposed to do... and it appears I'm not the only one. Slacko and some of the others have choices but Lucid doesn't seem to I've updated the package manager, nothing there, anyhow thanks in advance guys..

Jude

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#122 Post by peebee »

Jude wrote:Is there a version of Chromium for Lucid Puppy 528, I've been trying just about every suggestion on the forums and have gone all over the internet in search of one. Firefox updates itself making it a pleasure to use, but for those of us that aren't tech savvy what are we supposed to do... and it appears I'm not the only one. Slacko and some of the others have choices but Lucid doesn't seem to I've updated the package manager, nothing there, anyhow thanks in advance guys..

Jude
Your only choice with Lucid Puppy is maybe an old version (maybe try 28 ) as the fundamental components of Lucid are no longer supported by Chromium.

Carolina was in the same position and I think some work has gone on there to retrofit newer os components alongside the older ones to make chromium/chrome work. Whether this could be applied to Lucid I'm unsure.

The best approach would be to identify that work on the Carolina thread and then ask on both the Carolina and Lucid thread whether it can be applied to Lucid....somebody might be interested.

If I get a chance I'll try to find the posts and edit this post.

Cheers
peebee
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

Jude
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri 10 Oct 2014, 01:25

#123 Post by Jude »

That's kind a what i thought I've tried the updated versions of Lucid 528.005 528.006 and they all have the same Package manger. That's why i asked earlier on "in a different thread" about a possible upgrade to the Package Manager. If Lucid has been abandoned theirs really no sense in pursuing this any longer as the other versions of Puppy Linux won't work on my machine..

Thank you all for your support it is much appreciated..

Jude

Jude
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri 10 Oct 2014, 01:25

#124 Post by Jude »

Well I've found something else to take my mind off Chromium for a while, how's about Puppy Crypt 528. Sounds like a project that a lot of work went into, and according to the intro it makes you anonymous on the internet.. maybe Chromium will work here? :wink:

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=72178

Jude

bjn
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri 24 Jan 2014, 19:14

Re: chromium_38.0.2125.101 + pepperflash_15.0.0.152

#125 Post by bjn »

Hi, everyone :)

peebee wrote:chromium_38.0.2125.101 + pepperflash_15.0.0.152



THIS VERSION WILL ONLY WORK ON "MODERN" PUPPIES - LxPup14.09, LxTahrPup, Slacko6Beta2, TahrPup5.8.3

I'm using using Chromium_37.0.2062.120+pepper_15.0.0.152_lx.sfs on LxPup14.03, Slacko flavour. This combo works well for me. Is it okay for me to keep on using it, or do I need to update for security reasons?

Post Reply