The time now is Wed 22 May 2013, 03:19
All times are UTC - 4 |
|
Page 36 of 248 [3719 Posts] |
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, ..., 246, 247, 248 Next |
| Author |
Message |
Geoffrey

Joined: 30 May 2010 Posts: 919 Location: Queensland Australia ɹǝpu∩uʍop
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 12:24 Post subject:
|
|
| magerlab wrote: | It's not a bug it's a feature:)
there's an option to make a symlink via custom actions
Creating a symbolic link
Name: Create symlink
Command: ln -s %f ”%n (symlink)”
File pattern: *
Appears if selection contains: Directories, other files |
Hi magerlab,
I fixed it now it works
Name: Create Symlink
Command: [ `basename $PWD` != %n ] && ln -s %f link-to-%n
now when I make a link in the same folder such as "Downloads" the link looks like this and works "link-to-Downloads"
, I knew it should have worked, had me baffled as to why it didn't
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Geoffrey

Joined: 30 May 2010 Posts: 919 Location: Queensland Australia ɹǝpu∩uʍop
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 12:38 Post subject:
|
|
| jemimah wrote: | | Geoffrey wrote: |
I looked for the transparent panel, that was in Xfce panel preferences it allowed transparency with a slider than set alpha level, it appears to be missing, the older version use to make the panel and the icons on it transparent, the new version is supposed to only make the panel background transparent.
|
I think you are supposed to use a transparent background with the panel (like the transparent wallpaper). At least thats the impression I got from the xfce tour page. |
I thought that too, I tried a transparent image but it just shows up as a black bar, I'm pretty sure that the bars are independent from the composite window settings, it has it's own settings in the panel preferences, well in the 4.6 version it did and by what I have read online there is supposed to be a alpha setting in the panel preferences also, I tried looking for a image of the 4.8 panel to confirm it, I'll look some more.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jemimah

Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 4309 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 12:50 Post subject:
|
|
Yeah I looked at the source. It is a bug of some sort.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Geoffrey

Joined: 30 May 2010 Posts: 919 Location: Queensland Australia ɹǝpu∩uʍop
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 13:22 Post subject:
|
|
| jemimah wrote: | | Yeah I looked at the source. It is a bug of some sort. |
Here is a youtube vid showing the panel being adjusted http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMtwRM_65FY it shows a alpha slider as I thought there should be.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jemimah

Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 4309 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 13:28 Post subject:
|
|
I can force it to appear, but gtk is not playing ball. I have no idea why not. So I can get all-translucent panels, but not where the widgets are opaque.
Edit: GAH!!!! found the probem.
Remove this from /etc/profile and reboot and it'll work.
| Code: | | export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
magerlab
Joined: 08 Jul 2007 Posts: 730
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 13:51 Post subject:
|
|
as far as I remember opaque panel works if compositor for xfwm is enabled. After that you'll get alpha slider. I'll check that out if it works, I'm not in saluki now
_________________ skype: desafimager
www.youtube.com/sagartem -videos of my band
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sage
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Posts: 4623 Location: GB
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 14:03 Post subject:
|
|
Anyone cracked the single/double click conundrum yet?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
aarf
Joined: 30 Aug 2007 Posts: 3620 Location: around the bend
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 14:30 Post subject:
|
|
| Sage wrote: | | Anyone cracked the single/double click conundrum yet? | home edit preferences behavior
_________________
ASUS EeePC Flare series 1025C 4x Intel Atom N2800 @ 1.86GHz RAM 2063MB 800x600p ATA 320G
_-¤-_
<º))))><.¸¸.•´¯`•.#.•´¯`•.¸¸. ><((((º>
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sage
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Posts: 4623 Location: GB
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 14:35 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks, friend!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
alec78
Joined: 18 Mar 2010 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan 2012, 14:50 Post subject:
Delta Files |
|
Hi all,
Thank you for your prompt action Jermimah.
I should have been more specific, however, I had just downloaded the 005 iso and you were posting about the next iso, I panicked hence my post. I was thinking about future isos.
Very Sorry.
Thanks again.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 907 Location: Malvern, Worcs, UK
|
Posted: Sat 07 Jan 2012, 18:10 Post subject:
|
|
Wanted to try pnethood to access samba shares
Loaded the pets and setup the share OK but the "Show" button in pnethood didn't work.
Presumed that this was because it wanted /usr/bin/rox so wanted to create a symlink to /usr/bin/Thunar - tried to do so with the right click menu and hit the previous reported bug (sorry feature) that symlinks can't be created in the same directory (although a broken link is created and no error messages are given).
So copied Thunar instead of symlinking and renamed the copy rox - "Show" button in pnethood then worked.
/usr/bin/rox also needed to make pfind pets work (i.e. open found objects).
Thought - maybe having the rox symlink built in would allow some pets that assume the availability of rox to work without additional development?
This is a lesson learnt carried over from iguleder's guydog....which also exchanged rox for a different file manager.
Cheers
peebee
_________________ HP550 laptop: 2GHz Celeron, 2GB ram, Broadcom B43 wifi, Agere HDA modem [2009]
IBM Thinkpad 600: 266MHz PII, 160MB ram, 2GB swap partition, wifi & modem via pcmcia [1999]
Desktop: AMD Athlon II X2 260 4GB, Nvidia GeForce7025[2012]
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jemimah

Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 4309 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Sat 07 Jan 2012, 18:26 Post subject:
|
|
If you just symlink it, you get a bunch of errors on bootup as the background daemons try to add icons to the rox pinboard and such. If I get rid of that code entirely, it would prevent the real rox from working if you install it. We need a wrapper that gracefully does the right thing. Contributions welcome!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tman

Joined: 22 Jan 2011 Posts: 731 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Sun 08 Jan 2012, 15:50 Post subject:
|
|
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to say that I'm not going to be nearly as active in Puppy Linux stuff as I used to. Since November 2010, I have been spending much of my free time trying to learn puppy and trying out so many different pups/puplets.
But this year, I have decided to transfer my free time to a new project in my life, that I hope will lead to a new career. Puppy Linux is still my main OS, so I will still be browsing through this forum, but not nearly as often as I used to. I leave Saluki in the very capable hands of Jemimah. She has a lot of back-up from forum members, and although my assistance may have been helpful, it is not really needed. I may drop in on this thread once in a while, but for the most part, Saluki shall go on without me.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
futwerk
Joined: 07 May 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Sun 08 Jan 2012, 17:52 Post subject:
|
|
a few saluki wallpapers.
| Description |
http://www.mediafire.com/?7v1msw26s6chb |
| Filesize |
16.41 KB |
| Viewed |
608 Time(s) |

|
| Description |
http://www.mediafire.com/?7v1msw26s6chb |
| Filesize |
12.91 KB |
| Viewed |
613 Time(s) |

|
| Description |
http://www.mediafire.com/?7v1msw26s6chb |
| Filesize |
12.92 KB |
| Viewed |
603 Time(s) |

|
| Description |
http://www.mediafire.com/?7v1msw26s6chb |
| Filesize |
28.57 KB |
| Viewed |
599 Time(s) |

|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 907 Location: Malvern, Worcs, UK
|
Posted: Sun 08 Jan 2012, 18:22 Post subject:
|
|
| jemimah wrote: | | If you just symlink it, you get a bunch of errors on bootup as the background daemons try to add icons to the rox pinboard and such. If I get rid of that code entirely, it would prevent the real rox from working if you install it. We need a wrapper that gracefully does the right thing. Contributions welcome! |
Hi jemimah
I don't see any errors on reboot with my copy of /usr/bin/Thunar renamed to /usr/bin/rox
I've looked in dmesg and in /var/log/messages - no errors I can see
Where do you expect the errors to appear?
Cheers
peebee
_________________ HP550 laptop: 2GHz Celeron, 2GB ram, Broadcom B43 wifi, Agere HDA modem [2009]
IBM Thinkpad 600: 266MHz PII, 160MB ram, 2GB swap partition, wifi & modem via pcmcia [1999]
Desktop: AMD Athlon II X2 260 4GB, Nvidia GeForce7025[2012]
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|
|
Page 36 of 248 [3719 Posts] |
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, ..., 246, 247, 248 Next |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|