Saluki

A home for all kinds of Puppy related projects
Message
Author
User avatar
Lobster
Official Crustacean
Posts: 15522
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 06:06
Location: Paradox Realm
Contact:

#1221 Post by Lobster »

woof woof

mhwaveedit
and audacity working
You need to click on the speaker icon bottom right
and add mic capture, mic boost and things of that ilk to record

Audacity is notoriously temperamental so pleased with that :)
Puppy Raspup 8.2Final 8)
Puppy Links Page http://www.smokey01.com/bruceb/puppy.html :D

einar
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri 12 Nov 2010, 12:22

#1222 Post by einar »

jemimah wrote:
Ray MK wrote:Hi Jemimah
Viewnoir would be handy to have either in the repo or built in.
Same for gatotray-2.pet.
Viewnoir is in the "common" repo. I can build a new one if it's outdated. Let me know

Gatotray would be no problem, but there are a large number of xfce panel applets that do similar things and might be nicer. Also check out the nifty Psensor applet I just uploaded.
http://wpitchoune.net/blog/psensor/

EDIT: Ok, I've uploaded gatotray. :)

Im using Viewnoir but i still think its to slow. I think GPicView is a faster image viewer. http://lxde.sourceforge.net/gpicview/
Gwenview is also cool but thats only for KDE4 ? and is it possible to request GPicView and maybe google chrome ?

best regards

Einar

einar
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri 12 Nov 2010, 12:22

Spotify

#1223 Post by einar »

Haha :) i just run the linux native spotify client. the windows one under wine was very buggy and crashed every time i opened a big playlist.

now what you need is qt-4.8.0.pet and qt-webkit-4.8.0.pet installed.
then go to http://repository.spotify.com/pool/non-free/s/spotify/ and
download the spotify-client-qt_0.6.6.10.gbd39032.58-1_i386.deb

Double click ( petget ) and it installes and makes a icon under multimedia.

Have to credit STU90 for this tip i didnt try before today :)

I am in heaven :)

Best regards

Einar

User avatar
jemimah
Posts: 4307
Joined: Wed 26 Aug 2009, 19:56
Location: Tampa, FL
Contact:

#1224 Post by jemimah »

einar wrote:
jemimah wrote:
Ray MK wrote:Hi Jemimah
Viewnoir would be handy to have either in the repo or built in.
Same for gatotray-2.pet.
Viewnoir is in the "common" repo. I can build a new one if it's outdated. Let me know

Gatotray would be no problem, but there are a large number of xfce panel applets that do similar things and might be nicer. Also check out the nifty Psensor applet I just uploaded.
http://wpitchoune.net/blog/psensor/

EDIT: Ok, I've uploaded gatotray. :)

Im using Viewnoir but i still think its to slow. I think GPicView is a faster image viewer. http://lxde.sourceforge.net/gpicview/
Gwenview is also cool but thats only for KDE4 ? and is it possible to request GPicView and maybe google chrome ?

best regards

Einar
AFAIK Chrome/Chromium/Iron, do not have any portable builds available for download. They are all built against a glibc that is too new. Compiling Chrome from source is too big of a hassle even for me (source code is like 1GB and build system is not at all puppy friendly).

I'll add gpicview today probably.

EDIT: OK I thought of something regarding chrome. I might be able to pull it off.

elroy

#1225 Post by elroy »

Chrome would be cool. I've been using Opera as an alternative to Midori due to Midori instability issues, but I'd much rather have Chrome. Hope your idea works. That would be sweet.

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#1226 Post by peebee »

Ouch - sorry - post deleted
Last edited by peebee on Thu 23 Feb 2012, 21:56, edited 1 time in total.
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

User avatar
jemimah
Posts: 4307
Joined: Wed 26 Aug 2009, 19:56
Location: Tampa, FL
Contact:

#1227 Post by jemimah »

Actually I think iron is kind of evil. The idea of someone trying to profit by spreading FUD creeps me out.

http://neugierig.org/software/chromium/ ... /iron.html
http://chromium.hybridsource.org/the-iron-scam

elroy

#1228 Post by elroy »


User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

#1229 Post by mavrothal »

Jemimah,
Saluki looks pretty good at this point.
What else do you plan to get it out of beta?
Beef up the repo?
Some other new feature?
More polishing?
Just wondering...
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

User avatar
jemimah
Posts: 4307
Joined: Wed 26 Aug 2009, 19:56
Location: Tampa, FL
Contact:

#1230 Post by jemimah »

Well, I still need to make an adrive builder.
And I want to update the kernel before the release.
I have my eye on some enhancements for sfs-loader and pupdial as well.

I think that's it besides any additional bugs you guys find.

elroy

#1231 Post by elroy »

You go girl! - God, I really do hate that saying. I must be getting old....

An adrive GUI that is actually usable (assuming it'd be GUI driven), and one that is intuitive and user friendly (for both Linux/windows users) would be revolutionary. It'd revolutionize puppy Linux as we know it. It'd effectively obsolete woof (for this fork, anyway. But for future forks, too, if they choose to use this design, and bad on them if they didn't). Seriously, we can't even calculate the possibilities that the proposed adrive concept adds to the equation. The potential is a serious brain--f_uck. In actuality, this is a significant development, not only ti Linux, and specifically, puppy Linux, but in computing in general. Jemimah has created a model, for open source, that should be much admired. Highly compressed, easily modified, and, if she can get a GUI up an running, simple to use and easily modified by the end user. What more could you ask for?

User avatar
jemimah
Posts: 4307
Joined: Wed 26 Aug 2009, 19:56
Location: Tampa, FL
Contact:

#1232 Post by jemimah »

Well it won't make woof obsolete. You won't be able to update the core, or the kernel with it. You'd still be stuck with xfce.

But it should make it very easy to change up the applications without the complexity of woof or the pitfalls of a remaster.

elroy

#1233 Post by elroy »

Alright, fair enough; too much enthusiasm...but even so, it'd be revolutionary. It'd take puppy to the masses. If one could take a minimal build, and add to it whatever they want,or don't want (maybe then just want a simple small frugal install for rescue (ala catman), terminal based...who knows...ask them...) regardless of the window manager (you can always add a window manager so long as xfce4 is not too hard coded into everything..) .and disregard whatever they don't want...in an easy, intuitive, user friendly way, this would be a 7 on a scale of 1 to 10. How could it not be? That's what I desire in a distro The only thing that would make it better is to create a package manager that would natively install slacko/debian repository apps with one click. Seriously, Jemimah, excluding a new Linux core/testing (which/obviously would take some testing), what else would improve upon Saluki? The adrive concept is in-of-itself revolutionary, whether you want to be humble and not acknowledge it or not. It's brilliant. It's what keeps me interested, and if that's the case for me, than that's probably the case for others, too.

User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

#1234 Post by mavrothal »

jemimah wrote: You'd still be stuck with xfce.
It is actually a pity that JWM is not fully functional in Saluki, because looks like it needs so little additional attention to work fine and can offer true saluki speed.
Just needs 3 lines in .jwmrc to add the desktop background, a tmount tray applet, a little editing in *.desktop file categories so can all be picked up by JWM menu and Thunar to play nice with it (eg show file/folder icons - BTW ttuuxxx's thunar works fine).
You want to make it fancy? add a 2nd application tray on the top :wink:

Techno is even making a GUI tool for JWM settings to make life easy without the need of manual file editing.

Maybe it could squeeze somewhere in your todo list...
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

User avatar
jemimah
Posts: 4307
Joined: Wed 26 Aug 2009, 19:56
Location: Tampa, FL
Contact:

#1235 Post by jemimah »

Many of the control panel items will not work unless xfce is running. I have no intention of trying to make saluki work with other window managers. There are plenty of jwm puplets to choose from.

User avatar
mikeslr
Posts: 3890
Joined: Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:20
Location: 500 seconds from Sol

Can the xfce Panel be moved to the top?

#1236 Post by mikeslr »

Hi jemimah & all,

Can xfce's first panel be moved to the top? Maybe I missed how to? I know a second panel can be created and moved to the top, but in the second panel the "notification" plugin is grayed out. Or is "notification" something other than the "gauges" currently found on the bottom-right? [Excluding the partition mount app which I figured out, and the clock for which there's specific provision for adding].
The reason I ask is that I have in mind seeing how Saluki plays on an Asus 701SD where (a) screen space is limited and Xfce's ability to hide panels would be valuable; and (b) I've always had trouble using its touch-pad. My attempts to start an app by clicking a desktop icon frequently results in my just moving the icon someplace else. So having the most frequently used apps on a panel seems like a solution.

mikesLr

User avatar
Ray MK
Posts: 774
Joined: Tue 05 Feb 2008, 09:10
Location: UK

#1237 Post by Ray MK »

Hi mikeslr

Menu / Control Panel / desktop / panel

HTH - best regards - Ray
[b]Asus[/b] 701SD. 2gig ram. 8gb SSD. [b]IBM A21m[/b] laptop. 192mb ram. PIII Coppermine proc. [b]X60[/b] T2400 1.8Ghz proc. 2gig ram. 80gb hdd. [b]T41[/b] Pentium M 1400Mhz. 512mb ram.

User avatar
mavrothal
Posts: 3096
Joined: Mon 24 Aug 2009, 18:23

#1238 Post by mavrothal »

jemimah wrote:Many of the control panel items will not work unless xfce is running.
Many, is the following 3 (when only the base is installed) Xfwm settings and tweaks and Xfce panel preference
jemimah wrote:I have no intention of trying to make saluki work with other window managers. There are plenty of jwm puplets to choose from.
You said that before and I find it quite agreeable.

What I'm saying really is to remove the show-stoppers for JWM so if someone wants to manually force its use it can do it without a lot of hassle but with the understanding that is on her/his own on that.

Thunar is the bigger show-stopper in my mind.
The "%F" option in desktop files that JWM does not understand and the categories could be mended by the user if needed, while adding few lines in _root_.jwmrc is really trivial.

Anyway, is your baby.
Any pointers on Thunar?... :D
== [url=http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]Here is how to solve your[/url] [url=https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html]Linux problems fast[/url] ==

User avatar
mikeslr
Posts: 3890
Joined: Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:20
Location: 500 seconds from Sol

Saluki works fine on an eeepc Asus 701SD

#1239 Post by mikeslr »

Hi Jemimah, Ray MK & All,

After my post a couple posts back it occurred to me that Saluki, being for "more powerful" computers, might not be so great on my Asus 701SD. So I moved the puppy boot files on an 8gb USB Key into a directory, copied Saluki's boot files onto it, plugged it into the 701SD and booted. Had to run xorgwizard but otherwise had no problem getting to desktop. I've only tested a couple programs, the one's I'm likely to use while traveling. Abiword ran reasonably quickly. Opera ran well, but youtube under it was a little choppy. Mini-TV was a pleasure. FBreader seemed fine. Tomorrow I'll try Calibre. If it runs without a problem I'll have a machine far more usable than my wife's Kindle Fire, without having to plunk down $2H. Well, one of the pleasures of Puppy Linux is bragging rights.

Thanks Ray MK for the info re Xfce panel.

mikesLr

User avatar
technosaurus
Posts: 4853
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 01:24
Location: Blue Springs, MO
Contact:

#1240 Post by technosaurus »

you can pretty much always run jwm

Exit to console

Xorg & export DISPLAY=:0 && jwm -display :0
or
Xvesa -screen $WxHxBPP -nolisten tcp & export DISPLAY=:0 && jwm -display :0

if you _want_ anything else to start up with jwm there is a <StartupCommand> tag (it is on my todo list, but you can just add it in .jwmrc-tray for now) my microsaurus version only uses ~3Mb RAM total with Xvesa, jwm and rxvt all up and running

Edit ... thanks for reminding me about the %* in the desktop files - thats an easy fix
Check out my [url=https://github.com/technosaurus]github repositories[/url]. I may eventually get around to updating my [url=http://bashismal.blogspot.com]blogspot[/url].

Post Reply