rox filer 2.11, tarhpup 6.0.5

Please post any bugs you have found
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
fabrice_035
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2014, 17:54
Location: Bretagne / France

rox filer 2.11, tarhpup 6.0.5

#1 Post by fabrice_035 »

Hi,

About this error:

Code: Select all


(ROX-Filer:11179): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: Tried to register an extension of the type (null) to extension point gio-proxy-resolver. Expected type is GProxyResolver.

What is it ?

Code: Select all

Linux Kernel: 3.14.56 (i686)
Kernel Version: #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Nov 4 15:19:30 GMT-8 2015
PAE Enabled: Yes

Distro: tahrpup 6.0.5
Regard.

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#2 Post by musher0 »

Hello Fabrice.

I believe that error has to do with the glibc libraries, not with the ROX-
Filer per se.

Some Puppies do not have the absolutely entire set of glibc libraries, or
perhaps the ROX-Filer was compiled on another Puppy -- who had that
library, but on this Puppy, it cannot find it.

If your ROX-Filer is working fine, those kind of errors are nothing to
worry about.

But if it annoys you, you may try to add

Code: Select all

2>/dev/null
at the end of the command in file /usr/local/bin/rox, like this:

Code: Select all

#!/bin/sh
# /usr/local/bin/rox
####
exec /usr/local/apps/ROX-Filer/AppRun "${@#*file://}" 2>/dev/null

Code: Select all

2>/dev/null
is bash's way of allowing the user to mute benign errors generated
by a command.

If it were a serious error, you would need to do detective work to solve it.

IHTH
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

User avatar
fabrice_035
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2014, 17:54
Location: Bretagne / France

#3 Post by fabrice_035 »

good tips but rox totaly crash, error report :

Code: Select all

(ROX-Filer:17846): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_widget_event: assertion 'WIDGET_REALIZED_FOR_EVENT (widget, event)' failed
Idea ?

Thx.

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#4 Post by musher0 »

Hi, Fabrice.

Before I can suggest anything:

-- what Puppy are you using?
-- which version?
-- what kind of install? frugal? folder?

-- what type of computer? (basic description will do).

TIA.

~~~~~~~~
Off the top of my head:

I've never seen a Puppy released with a ROX-Filer that crashed.
You meddled with it or with some libraries?

But please answer the questions above first. The rest will be easier.

Thanks. BFN.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

oldaolgeezer
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun 03 Dec 2006, 19:34

rox filer 2.11, tarhpup 6.0.5

#5 Post by oldaolgeezer »

fabrice_035

Don't try this without backing up your working tahr_6.0.5 puppy system !

I tried the following "kludge" to get roxterm 1.22.2 pet to work in tahrpup 6.0.5 puppy:
(I used my puppy slacko 5.7.0 PC as my software donor computer ! )

Install the "roxterm 1.22.2 pet" in the usual way in tahr_6.0.5.

( in tahr_6.0.5, roxterm 1.22.2 needs the file: /usr/lib/libvte.so.9.2800.2
plus the file: /usr/share/vte/termcap-0.0/xterm
copied from puppy slacko 5.7.0 and two links )

so, copy /usr/lib/libvte.so.9.2800.2 from puppy slacko 5.7.0
and then make two links:

ln -s /usr/lib/libvte.so.9.2800.2 /usr/lib/libvte.so

ln -s /usr/lib/libvte.so.9.2800.2 /usr/lib/libvte.so.9

=====

next: missing directories: vte and termcap-0.0 must be created in the
/usr/share directory of the tahrpup 6.0.5 puppy.

and then copy, from puppy slacko 5.7.0, the file: /usr/share/vte/termcap-0.0/xterm
to /usr/share/vte/termcap-0.0/xterm of the tahrpup 6.0.5 puppy

test roxterm 1.22.2 by starting roxterm via the existing urxvt terminal window and then "copy" with a right click the following string:

cat /etc/DISTRO_SPECS | grep -E "DISTRO_NAME|DISTRO_VERSION"


and then, in the roxterm window, right click and choose "paste", hit enter
to test the command (you should see the following result:)

DISTRO_NAME='tahrpup'
DISTRO_VERSION=6.0.5

(note that the middle mouse wheel is not used ! )

User avatar
fabrice_035
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2014, 17:54
Location: Bretagne / France

#6 Post by fabrice_035 »

thanks, I prefer to wait and observate because solution is hard. I use tarhpup for years and rox worded well.
Regard.

Post Reply