I looked in my puppy_slacko_4.99.5.sfs and couldn't see it.01micko wrote:Oh it was there all right, just that "no-xcb" version from Barry's compile fest for wary/racy
If you installed the Canon scanner driver, you would have given it to yourself.
Here. My Canon pixma scanner backend is built this way - with libusb-compat-0.1 and libusb-1.0. However they claim that you can stick with the original libusb-0.1.01micko wrote:edit:praytell a version? link?Since Slacko now has libusb-1.0, the better package to add is libusb-0.1-compat.
ah I see what happened, Barry's package took out the older usb lib, I wonder if wary/racy has usb problems? woof issuercrsn51 wrote:I looked in my puppy_slacko_4.99.5.sfs and couldn't see it.01micko wrote:Oh it was there all right, just that "no-xcb" version from Barry's compile fest for wary/racy
If you installed the Canon scanner driver, you would have given it to yourself.
Code: Select all
yes|libtiff|libtiff|exe,dev,doc,nls
yes|libtool|libtool|exe>dev,dev,doc,nls
yes|libusb||exe,dev,doc,nls
yes|libusb1|libusb|exe,dev,doc,nls
yes|libvorbis|libvorbis|exe,dev,doc,nls
no|libvpx|libvpx|exe,dev,doc,nls
Erm, wouldn't that double the size of the iso.. and then some? I don't think an OS that exists can ship with EVERY driverI just received a PM from a user suggesting that Puppy should include drivers for EVERY printer.
Thanks!playdayz wrote:Here is Chromium-16 for Slacko. It was made and tested in B2.
http://diddywahdiddy.net/Puppy500/chrom ... slacko.pet
Racy has the same problem. It does not recognize my HP c4280 Photosmart.01micko wrote:ah I see what happened, Barry's package took out the older usb lib, I wonder if wary/racy has usb problems? woof issuercrsn51 wrote:I looked in my puppy_slacko_4.99.5.sfs and couldn't see it.01micko wrote:Oh it was there all right, just that "no-xcb" version from Barry's compile fest for wary/racy
If you installed the Canon scanner driver, you would have given it to yourself.
That is supposed to get the different versions.. but Barry's overwrote the slackware versionCode: Select all
yes|libtiff|libtiff|exe,dev,doc,nls yes|libtool|libtool|exe>dev,dev,doc,nls yes|libusb||exe,dev,doc,nls yes|libusb1|libusb|exe,dev,doc,nls yes|libvorbis|libvorbis|exe,dev,doc,nls no|libvpx|libvpx|exe,dev,doc,nls
Makes sense. However, your Lighthouse 64 problem is an entirely different issue. I don't know what it would be.I have posted the newer hplip_print_fd64-3.11.7.pet here. But I can't see how it would make any difference.Jim1911 wrote:Racy has the same problem. It does not recognize my HP c4280 Photosmart.
I installed your libusb-0.1.12-w5.pet which allowed me to install the printer in Racy, however, it would not print, sorta like the problem rcrsn51 mentioned that I had in LHP. Although installed, it will not print. I also installed your libusb-compat, it still will not print in Racy which I'm posting from now. I'll report this on the Racy thread.01micko wrote:Jim, try that libusb-compat I compiled, might work in racy, I don't think it linked to anything externally
Running from sfs, gives the highest Peacekeeper score I have ever seen on my old Acer lappy. Firefox 7 2700, Ch 16 4500.playdayz wrote:Here is Chromium-16 for Slacko. It was made and tested in B2.
http://diddywahdiddy.net/Puppy500/chrom ... slacko.pet
Guess my behavior is not typical then... download the iso, remove included browser, boot up, symlink Seamonkey (latest beta), Firefox (latest beta),symlink Opera, and sfs Chromium.Sage wrote:Thanks for your consideration, mick. I suppose it all comes down to the definition and use of 'decent'. Perhaps one could argue 'adequate'? Not sure how the guys over at Luci came to their strategy or how they implemented it, but it's nice to see choice pop up at an early stage. Politicians like to talk about choice, but they usually mean their choice! No need to parrot their behaviour?!