Fatdog64-520 Final

A home for all kinds of Puppy related projects
Post Reply
Message
Author
Sage
Posts: 5536
Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2005, 08:34
Location: GB

#16 Post by Sage »

I've never encountered any of those issues.
Thanks for your interest, James, Some new features seem to crop up at every iteration with 'new' projects! As a good scientist, I only report reproducible results (just in case you wonder). If I get the chance today, I'll wheel-out my trusty(?) old 939 which guarantees different behaviour to almost everything else in my armoury.

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#17 Post by James C »

Fresh multi-session dvd of Fatdog 520 final.Everything working on initial boot and persistent through several saved sessions.

-Computer-
Processor : 4x AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 620 Processor
Memory : 3796MB (235MB used)
Machine Type : Physical machine
Operating System : Puppy Linux 0.50
User Name : root (root)
Date/Time : Mon 05 Sep 2011 01:12:26 AM GMT+5
-Display-
Resolution : 1366x768 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Software Rasterizer
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Audio Devices-
Audio Adapter : HDA-Intel - HDA NVidia
Audio Adapter : PC-Speaker - pcsp


-Version-
Kernel : Linux 3.0.3 (x86_64)
Version : #1 SMP Thu Aug 18 22:58:50 GMT+5 2011
C Library : GNU C Library version 2.11.1 (stable)
Distribution : Puppy Linux 0.50

Still using the "nouveau" driver but working fairly well.

# glxgears
2532 frames in 5.0 seconds = 506.200 FPS
2588 frames in 5.0 seconds = 517.554 FPS
2581 frames in 5.0 seconds = 516.065 FPS
2590 frames in 5.0 seconds = 517.867 FPS
2591 frames in 5.0 seconds = 518.182 FPS
2558 frames in 5.0 seconds = 511.449 FPS

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#18 Post by James C »

Installed the Nvidia 280.13-for520 pet.

# glxgears
11035 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2206.800 FPS
11032 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2206.319 FPS
10852 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2170.272 FPS
10801 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2160.106 FPS
10709 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2141.773 FPS
10855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2170.938 FPS
10798 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2159.483 FPS
11040 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2207.889 FPS

Sage
Posts: 5536
Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2005, 08:34
Location: GB

#19 Post by Sage »

Well-founded suspicions! 939 behaved very differently. Whether pfix=ram, or vesa, or ram,vesa the boot up black-screened after completing the routine. This was only retrievable with an hard reset. Wary HardInfo detects on-board nV15, GF2 GTS/Pro chipset. Think there's been nV issues already!
Yes, there is something badly amiss with the initial video setup. First priority is to get a picture on any HW thrown at an OS. Twiddling with drivers/resolution/w.h.y. has to come later? There must be a way of doing this without prejudicing final setup and without using boot codes?

Later:
- using the full complement of pfix=ram,vesa nomodeset gave me a picture but xorgwizard still isn't functioning to enable a change of resolution.
PS: the 'pupX' came too late to change the mouse settings. Had to change the mouse to get access to the ability to change the settings! All this has to come first!
And finally?!: managed to get 1024x768 (icons askew) by using the menu version of Xorg Video Wizard - it didn't work from the CLI after CTRL-ALT-BKSPCE. No email client (in main menu)?
Package Manager is empty? and this is the first Puppy that won't accept Opera(other Deb)??? Looks like you guys will have to postpone that world cruise for a couple of years!

jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

#20 Post by jamesbond »

Sage,
The email client is "Thunderbird" - it's on the desktop next to the Firefox icon. As for the PPM - yeah it's blank, you need to "configure" it first to download the latest package list. The graphics is the difficult one, I don't have any answer.

For others:
- I've just uploaded the latest skype.sfs and jre 1.6.
-An as announced earlier, there is openshot.sfs version 1.3 which includes blender too.

cheers!
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

Sage
Posts: 5536
Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2005, 08:34
Location: GB

#21 Post by Sage »

Thanks, jb. I expected to find the email client in the menu as well as desktop. I don't use Thunderbird, anyway - Claws or EudoraOSE!
Yes, the video is a major bugaboo, but so could be the mouse one if there isn't a boxload of spares knocking around...

Jim1911
Posts: 2460
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 20:39
Location: Texas, USA

#22 Post by Jim1911 »

Congratulations,

Great final release. Fast, stable, and everything works on my two systems, including wireless.

Kudos, :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Thanks,
Jim

Minnesota
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu 11 Sep 2008, 11:25

Flashing Video

#23 Post by Minnesota »

I suspect it might be the drivers.. .however I have never seen this in any puppy, and not with the RC

Computer - Intel E8400 Duo 3GH. Nvidia GeForce 9400GT card.

Boot halts with tiny print on the screen. I suspect, wizard has adjusted the video. NOTHING till I hit enter then something flashes on the screen. I get a desktop...Icons seem large, yet hardware info shows 1040x.

STRANGE part is the screen flashes about every three or five seconds.

raffy
Posts: 4798
Joined: Wed 25 May 2005, 12:20
Location: Manila

emachines fusion monitor

#24 Post by raffy »

Thanks, folks, for the FD 520 final.

I hope I don't dampen your enthusiasm with bad news - X can't work in my AMD Fusion Laptop even with the kernel parameter tweaks of pfix=vesa,nox nomodeset (and any possible combination).

But FD 520 never hangs Xorg at once, only after about 2 minutes.

My emachines fusion laptop monitor must be the problematic part that makes Xorg fail in this machine (too sad, this is the much-promising AMD Fusion APU solution). (However, FD 511 has pristine Xorg setup doing direct rendering in this machine, so there lies the confusion.)

I wonder how Xorg setup can be tweaked without hanging the whole system? FD 520 and even other/newer Puppies can't get past xorgwizard's "Probing..." in this machine. Older Xorgwizard (in pup 431, for example) never hangs at that point.

EDIT: For diagnostics, am attaching the contents of /tmp and the result of lspci.

Code: Select all

00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 14h Processor Root Complex
00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Device 9802
00:11.0 SATA controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode]
00:12.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller
00:12.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller
00:13.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller
00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller
00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 42)
00:14.2 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) (rev 40)
00:14.3 ISA bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 LPC host controller (rev 40)
00:14.4 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge (rev 40)
00:14.5 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI2 Controller
00:15.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc Device 43a0
00:15.1 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc Device 43a1
00:16.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller
00:16.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller
00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 0 (rev 43)
00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 1
00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 2
00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 3
00:18.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 4
00:18.5 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 6
00:18.6 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 5
00:18.7 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 7
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications AR8152 v2.0 Fast Ethernet (rev c1)
06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless LAN Controller (rev 01)
Attachments
fd520-tmp-in-AMD_fusion-emachinesD443.tar.gz
Contents of /tmp (with the large slmodem files not included).
(26.71 KiB) Downloaded 638 times
Last edited by raffy on Wed 07 Sep 2011, 06:00, edited 1 time in total.
Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? [url=http://puppylinux.info/topic/freeoffice-2012-sfs]Get the sfs (English only)[/url].

WillM
Posts: 173
Joined: Wed 30 Dec 2009, 04:42
Location: Oakland, California

#25 Post by WillM »

Thanks for this superb release of Fatdog64.
The Nvidia 280.13-for520-final pet made a huge difference in glxgears.

Before;
$ glxgears
5458 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1091.505 FPS
5443 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1088.464 FPS
5406 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1081.159 FPS
5451 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1090.188 FPS
5437 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1087.379 FPS
5460 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1091.853 FPS

After;
$ glxgears
59700 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11939.896 FPS
60600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 12119.887 FPS
61053 frames in 5.0 seconds = 12210.467 FPS
60648 frames in 5.0 seconds = 12129.568 FPS
60998 frames in 5.0 seconds = 12199.422 FPS
60948 frames in 5.0 seconds = 12189.529 FPS
61149 frames in 5.0 seconds = 12229.744 FPS

User avatar
patelbhavesh
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2011, 22:53
Location: Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Contact:

#26 Post by patelbhavesh »

I have edited the wikipedia page announcing this release @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppy%20Linux
More users will look at it :-).

gcmartin

PPM problem

#27 Post by gcmartin »

Has this been reported? PPM issues. Maybe I missed,but is documented to use a different method for system package management?

Might want to consider an update?

Hope this helps
Attachments
Question - PPM Repo_Why None to Update.png
Cannot add needed packages
(102.58 KiB) Downloaded 1263 times
Last edited by gcmartin on Tue 06 Sep 2011, 19:13, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#28 Post by James C »

FWIW, configuring the PPM worked well here.

jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

#29 Post by jamesbond »

gcmartin, what exactly is the problem? I clicked "update now" and then it works, I can see the packages ... as James C also confirmed.
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

timothyli
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun 22 Jun 2008, 07:44
Location: Toronto, Canada

#30 Post by timothyli »

Fatdog64-520 Final is sweet. Thumbs up. Thanks! :D

User avatar
rcrsn51
Posts: 13096
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 13:50
Location: Stratford, Ontario

Re: Flashing Video

#31 Post by rcrsn51 »

Minnesota wrote:Boot halts with tiny print on the screen. I suspect, wizard has adjusted the video. NOTHING till I hit enter then something flashes on the screen. I get a desktop...Icons seem large, yet hardware info shows 1040x.
I am getting something similar, but only in PUPMODE=5 - a frugal install with no pupsave. I need to type "xwin" to get a desktop. I'm sure that no previous version behaved like this.

Also, sfs_load is still broken because of the change in kernel number. However, when I try to force it into SFSVER=4, the program breaks. (???)

kirk
Posts: 1553
Joined: Fri 11 Nov 2005, 19:04
Location: florida

#32 Post by kirk »

Also, sfs_load is still broken because of the change in kernel number.
Sorry, somehow I didn't put that in. I'll attach a pet to fix it.

I am getting something similar, but only in PUPMODE=5 - a frugal install with no pupsave. I need to type "xwin" to get a desktop. I'm sure that no previous version behaved like this.
What kind of graphics card is that with?
Attachments
sfs-load-fix.pet
(19.42 KiB) Downloaded 775 times

User avatar
rcrsn51
Posts: 13096
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 13:50
Location: Stratford, Ontario

#33 Post by rcrsn51 »

kirk wrote:
Also, sfs_load is still broken because of the change in kernel number.
Sorry, somehow I didn't put that in. I'll attach a pet to fix it.
Your PET does the same weird thing as my patch. It breaks the gtkdialog so the file chooser icon no longer appears. Maybe someone else can test this.

kirk wrote:
I am getting something similar, but only in PUPMODE=5 - a frugal install with no pupsave. I need to type "xwin" to get a desktop. I'm sure that no previous version behaved like this.
What kind of graphics card is that with?
It's an old ATI Radeon Xpress 200G. But I believe that I also saw it happen on a newer machine with Intel graphics.

gcmartin

#34 Post by gcmartin »

This morning I reported PPM update not working

Now, It working fine as you can see

Code: Select all

rm: cannot remove `/root/.packages/Packages-puppy-fd64-offical*': No such file or directory

A package information database file needs to be downloaded.
This will be downloaded from:
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/fatdog/pets/500/Packages-puppy-fd64-offical
and will be processed and named Packages-puppy-fd64-offical.
Press ENTER key to download, any other to abort: 
...success.

http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/fatdog/pets/500/Packages-puppy-fd64-offical
and will be named Packages-puppy-fd64-offical.
Press ENTER key to download, any other to abort: 
...success

FINISHED
After returning to the main GUI window of the package manager,
it will be reading the updated database files.
Press ENTER key to exit:   
Maybe a glitch somewhere between then and now. Interestingly, I was able to surf the web, and access the FATDOG site for PETs. But the PPM was not cooperating as it always had.

User avatar
rcrsn51
Posts: 13096
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 13:50
Location: Stratford, Ontario

#35 Post by rcrsn51 »

I ran some tests on a newer machine with Intel graphics and the video worked fine.

However, the sfs_load bug continues. The gtkdialog doesn't render properly.

Post Reply