Author |
Message |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15588 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Tue 06 Sep 2011, 14:31 Post subject:
|
|
Is this multiple user option feasible:
When we boot up with the option
'puppy pfix=ram'
we are effectively creating a new user
So give a 'new user' boot option
at this stage
Some pups already have a 'boot options' menu
Later when multiple user saves are provided
we can offer an 'encrypted password protect'
and later on shutdown our data can be encrypted
Our security should not follow a generic pattern
and generic hack pattern
_________________ Puppy Raspup 8.2 Final
Puppy Links Page http://www.smokey01.com/bruceb/puppy.html 
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
nooby
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 Posts: 10548 Location: SwedenEurope
|
Posted: Tue 06 Sep 2011, 14:41 Post subject:
|
|
Lobster that is a good way to let a family keep things private or if you use Puppy at work.
But it is still a single user system but a kind of serial multi user letting them isolate their privacy from each other but seen from outside if somebody breaks in then being root makes us more vulnerable than the average linux user would.
one the other hand. If I run root on Slitaz would that not also makes me as vulnerable?
_________________ I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mavrothal

Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 3108
|
Posted: Tue 06 Sep 2011, 23:53 Post subject:
|
|
nooby wrote: |
Okay that something is known does not explicitly say it is easy or even possible within a reasonable time and effort.
Pizzasgood spent many weeks even months? on doing it way back with Puppy 412? it was not easy at all. None else have felt for doing all that work again with some more modern version.
You write as if it is easy. As I get it, it is not easy at all. |
Is not easy or hard, reasonable or unreasonable.
Is a design decision and is up to BK and his woof, to make.
Now regarding fido, spot and the likes, I think that what is really needed is a reliable work-around for the denial of more and more modern browsers to run as root.
If the work-around is indeed an isolated area all the better.
_________________ == Here is how to solve your Linux problems fast ==
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15588 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Wed 07 Sep 2011, 00:44 Post subject:
|
|
Quote: | If the work-around is indeed an isolated area all the better. |
Fatdog64 does this
from the command line
Code: | su spot -c defaultbrowser |
_________________ Puppy Raspup 8.2 Final
Puppy Links Page http://www.smokey01.com/bruceb/puppy.html 
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mavrothal

Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 3108
|
Posted: Wed 07 Sep 2011, 01:25 Post subject:
|
|
Lobster wrote: |
from the command line
Code: | su spot -c defaultbrowser |
|
I wish...
spot does not have user data directories ( ~/.config etc)
"Problem" browsers do not check/care how they are called but where to write.
_________________ == Here is how to solve your Linux problems fast ==
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
01micko

Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 8787 Location: qld
|
Posted: Wed 07 Sep 2011, 03:31 Post subject:
|
|
mavrothal wrote: | spot does not have user data directories ( ~/.config etc)
"Problem" browsers do not check/care how they are called but where to write. |
As I see it, yes I think that is the issue, especially with chromium based browsers gaining popularity.
_________________ Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
nooby
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 Posts: 10548 Location: SwedenEurope
|
Posted: Wed 07 Sep 2011, 03:47 Post subject:
|
|
Mick does that apply for chromium if one start up as an SFS using SFS load on the fly?
And if one make a Puppy that run as real multiuser then will not every pet for the single user puppy expect to still be in single user environ and act up on a multiuser system? It would need it's own repo or somebody's else repo?
mavrothal if it was that easy as your word hint to then Barry Would have done it already or him don't want Puppy to be seen as a standard Linux?
I trust what Pizzasgood told us. toom him many weeks of 24/7 hard work.
_________________ I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mavrothal

Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 3108
|
Posted: Wed 07 Sep 2011, 05:47 Post subject:
|
|
nooby wrote: |
I trust what Pizzasgood told us. toom him many weeks of 24/7 hard work. |
Me too.
But this exact fact is what makes it easier for anybody else that wants to implement it.
He has the entire process documented and the files in a git repository!
The only other thing that would make it "easier", is for him to do it all-over again for every puplet that comes out
_________________ == Here is how to solve your Linux problems fast ==
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
nooby
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 Posts: 10548 Location: SwedenEurope
|
Posted: Wed 07 Sep 2011, 10:09 Post subject:
|
|
Now, I am a very poor reader but I did try to get what Pizzasgood told us and as I get it that is not as you say. He has that for puppy 412 or puppy421 I don't remember which.
it would not help much to do the same for Lupu 528 or wary or Quirky or ...
He himself it was so demanding him never would do it again.
And that is by somebody who already done it once. So think about what that means for somebody who never have undertaken it.
Sure it can be my poor English. When I read you it sounds easy.
As I read pizzasgood it is so difficult him never would do it again.
So the person doing it need to be even more patient and be at it than pizzasgood was and I trust that none will ever do it. Too much work.
Nothing gained either only flack from the puppy lovers and maybe flack too from the puppy haters that it is still not enough. grub2 missing or root allowed too easily something is always wrong due to puppy do things not as them want things to be done.
_________________ I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
nooby
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 Posts: 10548 Location: SwedenEurope
|
Posted: Wed 07 Sep 2011, 10:30 Post subject:
|
|
So how do we do this? Fixing Fido..
1. First things first. We need testers.
2. Testers tell what happens and then
3. we need Devs that care enough about Fido to fix things.
4. ....
I have the time and due to my poor memory I do behave like a kind of noob.
But sadly I am too thin skinned so I feel hurt too easily when thing go down the drain with the OS I use. I am not patient enough. I feel to sad!
So somebody else is needed to test Fido. I will not do it until somebody say it works as intended now do this do that and it will just work!
Then I test it too.
_________________ I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
01micko

Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 8787 Location: qld
|
Posted: Fri 09 Sep 2011, 17:08 Post subject:
|
|
Ok, first things first..
Slacko should be released within the next 4 weeks, I would like to get the current implementation of Fido fixed such that it works as painlessly as possible. This at least gives the "root" nay sayers no excuse not to at least try Puppy. If it's not fixed then Fido will be disabled in Slacko.
Down the track other implementations of "multi-user" can be added. That will certainly be the more difficult task, and perhaps a more long term goal. This could include an easy way to set up separate password protected save files in a frugal environment.
I will be running as Fido for the next few days and I would like if I could snag a couple of testers of Slacko B2 to do the same.
Cheers
_________________ Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
James C

Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Posts: 6735 Location: Kentucky
|
Posted: Fri 09 Sep 2011, 20:40 Post subject:
|
|
01micko wrote: |
I will be running as Fido for the next few days and I would like if I could snag a couple of testers of Slacko B2 to do the same.
|
I personally have no interest in "fido" but I test everything.
Fresh frugal install of Slacko using "fido". Basically only went through the first-run stuff,set the firewall and downloaded Flash before making the fidosave file.
On initial boot using "fido" immediately had to enter the root password to allow something to run before I even got to the desktop. (usr/sbin/bootmanager)
No wallpaper or icons.Rox will not launch from the menu and segfaults from the terminal.
Pmount works,after giving the root password though. Obviously SeaMonkey and MTpaint works as well.
Description |
|
Filesize |
4.54 KB |
Viewed |
976 Time(s) |

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
James C

Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Posts: 6735 Location: Kentucky
|
Posted: Fri 09 Sep 2011, 21:07 Post subject:
|
|
Unable to reboot or poweroff from the menu ........just restarts X and requires the root password to run usr/sbin/bootmanager. Same result if trying to exit to a prompt.
Was able to install the Nvidia driver and Firefox though.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
James C

Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Posts: 6735 Location: Kentucky
|
Posted: Fri 09 Sep 2011, 21:12 Post subject:
|
|
Tried going to "root" and poweroff or reboot from the terminal.....fail.Only continues to restart X.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
James C

Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Posts: 6735 Location: Kentucky
|
Posted: Fri 09 Sep 2011, 21:16 Post subject:
|
|
Still can't reboot but Rox will launch from the terminal as root.
Description |
|
Filesize |
30.65 KB |
Viewed |
1014 Time(s) |

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|