Linux 3.0.3 with Aufs3, BFS, 64/32 bit kernel, PAE, etc.

News, happenings
Message
Author
User avatar
pemasu
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed 08 Jul 2009, 12:26
Location: Finland

#21 Post by pemasu »


l0wt3ch

#22 Post by l0wt3ch »

@ puppyluvr: I want to make an awesome general-use kernel based on 3.0 - none had been available when I started this thread , so I was trying to fill a gap, "give back " to the Puppy community sorta thing.

@ Pemasu: Thanks! Ill try that out as soon as I can. :)

scsijon
Posts: 1596
Joined: Thu 24 May 2007, 03:59
Location: the australian mallee
Contact:

#23 Post by scsijon »

firstly may I say, WOW, what a step!

secondly, talk to barry, he has been blogging about staying with the 2.6.x kernals for all the work needed to handle 3.x.x AS WELL AS keeping 2.6.x within woof, maybe you would consider either taking the task on for him or just doing "the rough work"?

and, does a version of your kernal include btrfs (please), consider secondary cache being compressed, but primary not, a rough equivalent!

welcome back anyway!

scsijon

l0wt3ch

#24 Post by l0wt3ch »

lowtech
bremer
Mystery X
l0wt3ch

These are all the same person.
Not true.

lowtech is another user who just happens to have a similar name.

bremer was a public BugMeNot account that I used for a while, mostly before joining the forum, that multiple people used.

Mystery X was mysterious, but...

I only go by "l0wt3ch" (since getting my username back), and previously made it clear that I was posting under different aliases ("This is l0wt3ch behind seven proxies") when I couldn't use that handle.

So get a life.

User avatar
JohnMurga
Site Admin
Posts: 555
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 04:26
Location: Far to the east
Contact:

#25 Post by JohnMurga »

l0wt3ch wrote:I only go by "l0wt3ch" (since getting my username back), and previously made it clear that I was posting under different aliases ("This is l0wt3ch behind seven proxies") when I couldn't use that handle.

So get a life.
The post you replied to was mode a by a user who seemed specifically created to upset you, drive you away, whatever. I can confirm from the logs that you are not all those people ...

However, the user who made the posts uses the same kinda proxies as others who seek to discredit the forum (not going to say who, as I may awaken the Kraken again LOL).

Some people really do have to get a life ;-)

Cheers
John de Murga

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#26 Post by James C »

Just waiting for you to magically get deleted. :)
My post made sense until the sockpuppet posts above were deleted. :lol:

User avatar
arcanis
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun 30 Oct 2011, 22:17
Location: Columbus, Ohio

#27 Post by arcanis »

I just want to know about the kernel. Is there any news about this kernel? Is there now a working version of this kernel? What about the kernel?
:?

l0wt3ch

#28 Post by l0wt3ch »

I'm sorry, but work has taken all of my time, and I haven't got all the bugs out of my kernel.

However, you will be happy to know that Barry has released his own 3.0 kernel.

User avatar
arcanis
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun 30 Oct 2011, 22:17
Location: Columbus, Ohio

#29 Post by arcanis »

Thank you. I understand about life intervening. I will check out BK's kernel now.
Thanks. :D

Post Reply