Yeah. I don't know how many saw this post. Open this and move slider to 15 minute mark and watch for 1 minute as they compare to SeaMonkey.. It amazing how significant this browser's performance really is.playdayz wrote:Seamonkey 2.1
This is the release of Seamonkey 2.1. ... significant...
In Puppy, we have a propensity of reducing size and then complaining about performance. Let's not, this time. If I can double my performance on a single 20MB hit, I'll take the performance benefit! This is what is important to many users.
I'm not saying its the right solution for everyone, as everyone has their preference, but for an all inclusive browser with everything that SM does, I am just happy that the Mozilla community continues to bring us this complete subsystem. SM NEVER WAS A BROWSER. It is a subsystem!
Let's consider getting adjusted with SM 2.1 before the community begins its "slash and burn" mission by chopping pieces out of the product. It's unfortunate that this occurs on a stellar product, but ... oh well..
This is the wrong place to post this. We should have a SM only thread that gets updated for 32 and 64 bit PUPs as well as all the differing varieties of Repo contributions. Wow!.
Hope this helps