Page 1 of 2

Angry IP Scanner 3.0 Beta6 32-bit

Posted: Fri 29 Apr 2011, 04:16
by DPUP5520
A fast and friendly IP Scanner written in java converted to pet by request. Can be run by going to network under the menu and clicking on the menu icon there.

Java Required

Posted: Fri 29 Apr 2011, 08:29
by gcmartin
To use this tool, JAVA is REQUIRED!

This is a great additional to the networking arsenal. This is, by far, the fastest network scanner on the planet.
Image
Cannot Thank YOU enough for this.

Posted: Sun 01 May 2011, 20:45
by pemasu
Wrong thread.

Problems with some PUPs

Posted: Sat 11 Jun 2011, 07:24
by gcmartin
I tried running AngryIP in ICEPUP and SNOWPUP by @Pemasu.

Java was installed, first. Then AngryIP.. It seem to install OK but clicking Menu > Network > AngryIP did not start the application.

Could someone look at this and give an assessment?

Thanks in advance
P.S. Same problem with "IP Monitor".

Posted: Sat 11 Jun 2011, 11:57
by Geoffrey
Nice one, works a treat, really fast, thankyou for this.

gcmartin, sounds as if java isn't installed correctly, try typing " java -version " in the terminal, you should get a message like this.

Code: Select all

# java -version
java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode, sharing)

Posted: Sat 11 Jun 2011, 14:54
by DPUP5520
I don't know why it wouldn't be working in Snowpup but it could be a problem with the experimental kernel is Icepup that's causing you're problem there (just a thought I don't really know) if Java is installed correctly. I have a pet for Beta 5 done just gotta post it up when I get a chance.

Can this JAVA app check for JAVA at PET installation?

Posted: Sat 11 Jun 2011, 16:02
by gcmartin
Thanks everyone, I'll do some further checks.

Edited:][/b removed as it was an inaccurate statement.
Edited2: I've since found that this problem also existed in prior releases of ICE/SNOW. This is a QuickPET/PPM issue with these 2 distros. The distro author has resolved the JAVA issue "outside of the PPM"

@DPUP5520, I had mentioned this before: (If you see merit, you may want to add). A check of JAVA presence could provide same assistance to anyone using the 2 JAVA PET masterpieces (AngryIP and IPmonitor).
  • At installation could PET provide a dependency check for JAVA (seems like a lot of PETs do that when installed from PPM)?
    Or
  • At installation could PET launch a background JAVA test and alert if JAVA missing?
    Or
  • Differently, at application launch, could the application run an alert if JAVA is missing?
Your tools work fine, when JAVA is present. But, for example, in the case of SNOW/ICE, nothing is showing up on the desktop when menu launched.
ALSO: Could you post the 64bit PET for AngryIP_V5b to here along with the 32bit PET already there. I will test it for you.

All other PUP systems, thus far, do NOT exhibit this problem that I have run into with SNOW/ICE JAVA installation.

Thanks for all advice and Hope this helps.

Posted: Sat 11 Jun 2011, 21:57
by DPUP5520
gcmartin

I will make a 64bit pet tonight or tomorrow and post it here for testing as I don't run any 64bit puppies. I will modify the new pet I have for Beta 5 when I have time and set it so when the program is run it will do a Java check.

AngryIP V5 - 32 and 64bit

Posted: Sun 12 Jun 2011, 03:24
by gcmartin
DPUP5520 wrote:gcmartin

I will make a 64bit pet tonight or tomorrow and post it here for testing as I don't run any 64bit puppies. I will modify the new pet I have for Beta 5 when I have time and set it so when the program is run it will do a Java check.
Thanks. The overall community will benefit. Thanks.

On the earlier JAVA issue
I did post the problem on the ICE thread. Others have verified the issue I ran into. Pemasu has indicated a possible resolution. But, this is a strange one indeed. And, he admittedly, has little to no JAVA experience.

If you have seen something like this before, your insights could help.

Posted: Sun 12 Jun 2011, 16:10
by DPUP5520
added a 64bit pet of AngryIP beta5 top post

Posted: Mon 13 Jun 2011, 15:07
by DPUP5520
Added 32bit pet of AngryIP beta5 top post, 32bit beta4 will be left up for time being.

Posted: Tue 14 Jun 2011, 05:59
by gcmartin
Its definitely V5 for me. It has excellent layout.

Hop ths helps

Missing functionality in AngryIP

Posted: Thu 12 Jan 2012, 22:27
by gcmartin
Here’s something of interest on using AngryIP. It seems to have a couple of issues where it is different from the Windows version in 2 very important areas..

They are
  • ability to show MAC address column in results Window
  • ability to capture and display the hostname after scanning LAN
See this links for a flow on the problems.

Help if you can.

Posted: Wed 25 Jan 2012, 04:15
by DPUP5520
Sorry for the late reply, I suspect these are feature simply not implemented yet as it is still a beta and all. I tried contacting the developers to no avail.

Posted: Thu 02 Feb 2012, 22:34
by gcmartin
DPUP5520 wrote:Sorry for the late reply, I suspect these are feature simply not implemented yet as it is still a beta and all. I tried contacting the developers to no avail.
Thanks, I think the issue is because one is AngryIP version 2 (non-java) versus the other being AngryIP version 3 (java). Thus, there are probably some limitations.

Its still the fastest IP scanner on the market.

Hope this helps

Posted: Wed 11 Jul 2012, 02:48
by edoc
Thanks for this excellent tool!

It appears to work fine with Exprimo 5x14 on a netbook.

Question: What would you pair with it to analyze ISP bandwidth, speed, etc, please?

Posted: Sat 21 Jul 2012, 20:59
by DPUP5520
Theres a network monitoring tool called EtherApe which can monitor connections and speed although I haven't used it for bandwith monitoring but Wireshark can do that and I think Exprimo has Puppy's built in bandwith monitor.

Posted: Mon 24 Dec 2012, 22:46
by DPUP5520
New version of AngryIP up in the first post

Posted: Tue 25 Dec 2012, 00:53
by edoc
Thanks!

Sure wish the world of Puppy had a push-mail list, or similar, to notify of new and of updates.

Just hoping to notice them doesn't seem the best method ...

Posted: Tue 25 Dec 2012, 06:14
by DPUP5520
Possibly, however implementing it would be a major pain.