The Official Release of Lucid 5.25 (Lucid Five Twenty-Five)

Message

ASRI Ã©ducation · #46 Post by **ASRI Ã©ducation** » Fri 25 Feb 2011, 20:40

reckrhodes wrote:... Please include binaries or repositories of edubuntu(educational version of ubuntu). I find it hard to install their latest educational applications.

Excellente idée

playdayz · #47 Post by **playdayz** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 02:34

Luci-251 is the most leading-edge Lucid ever. It is posted int he first message of this thread.

We are well on the way to Lucid 5.2.1. Please test..

James C · #48 Post by **James C** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 04:59

Fresh frugal install of Luci-251 on the old P4 test box. Everything working on initial boot. Installed Xorg_High, SeaMonkey 2.1 b1,VLC and Pwidgets...everything working well.

VIDEO REPORT: Lucid Puppy, version 251

Chip description:
Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller

Driver used by Xorg:

Video mode used by Xorg:
Resolution: Depth:

...the above also recorded in /tmp/report-video
#

# glxgears
1375 frames in 5.0 seconds
1452 frames in 5.0 seconds
1508 frames in 5.0 seconds
2000 frames in 5.0 seconds
1941 frames in 5.0 seconds
2046 frames in 5.0 seconds

DM was on fire! · #49 Post by **DM was on fire!** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 05:33

I have a silly question that I hope no one will mind my asking: what is the system running on this time? JWM or OpenBox?

James C · #50 Post by **James C** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 05:40

DM was on fire! wrote:I have a silly question that I hope no one will mind my asking: what is the system running on this time? JWM or OpenBox?

Luci still defaults to starting with Openbox.......I just immediately switch to JWM as in the above screenshot.

DM was on fire! · #51 Post by **DM was on fire!** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 05:41

That's what I figured, but I wanted to know for sure. I am so madly in love with OpenBox I don't want to give it up.
Thank you James!

Lobster · #52 Post by **Lobster** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 05:42

The main input device shorted out with who knows what cross linked and Puppy still works.
I am impressed!

I have run Puppy when all my Hard disks have failed and USB booting was not available, using multisession . . .
Brave Pup . . . wants to run . . .

In 250, will download latest if I can,

In jwm the OOolight SFS displays so far up the screen you can not access the maximise and other buttons from the mouse - this is not the case with openbox, where it is OK

Is it possible to have a chat button much like the browse button
which gives the option of a variety of software - xchat, pidgin, ayttm, web based?

playdayz · #53 Post by **playdayz** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 06:37

It looks like Openssl 1.0.0 won't work. Sylpheed wants 0.9.8 but will accept a symlink, but gftp also wants it and will not accept a symlink. The best (and simplest) solution is to go back to 0.9.8 in luci-252. 0.9.8 is what Natty is using so it is state of the art, even if it doesn't have the nice 1.0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

educational applications.

James C found the edubuntu desktop. etc., but I doubt we could run that. I had assumed there would be many applications that were included.

jpeps · #54 Post by **jpeps** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 07:14

playdayz wrote:It looks like Openssl 1.0.0 won't work. Sylpheed wants 0.9.8 but will accept a symlink, but gftp also wants it and will not accept a symlink. The best (and simplest) solution is to go back to 0.9.8 in luci-252. 0.9.8 is what Natty is using so it is state of the art, even if it doesn't have the nice 1.0.

I'm using openssl-1.0.0d-w-20110209 without problems; needed it for TOR, but sylpheed and gftp is working.

James C · #55 Post by **James C** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 07:25

playdayz wrote:
educational applications.
James C found the edubuntu desktop. etc., but I doubt we could run that. I had assumed there would be many applications that were included.

Long,long ago when Edubuntu was a separate release I seem to remember everything being available in individual packages....now that it's just an addon to Ubuntu it appears they just combined everything.

Lobster · #56 Post by **Lobster** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 08:47

Upgraded from 250 to 251 - simples, went well
Choose the simple desktop icon arrangement that James C has depicted earlier in this thread - oh I like that . . .

Aer, Argo gold and other icon sets are a separate download? Their buttons appear [without icons] in the 'desktop icon switcher' selector but they are not included?

nooby · #57 Post by **nooby** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 09:25

Did a fast frugal install on the NTFS where I have my other Puppies too and installed FF and tested to do streaming video on our local TV station.
Then looked at some pictures of Cats and Dogs trying to look cute and played an old cover of Rock'nRoll from 1960.

Looks okay from here.

I use nosmp with this one. should I test without it? I am on Acer D250 and Lupu usually don't boot consistently if I exclude the nosmp.

what does the nosmp take away? Is it better to do without it and only use if it is the only way to boot?

No criticism and not a request or demand either

but what is it about Fluppy and Snow Puppy that allow them to use the RFKILL and Threaded something and a third thing that allow these puppies to reliably boot while Lupu need an added nosmp for to boot? Why can not Lupu have the RFKILL and threaded thing too? Just me trying to understand.

Lobster · #58 Post by **Lobster** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 09:40

Using the fontwizard.pet in 251
from Lucid news
http://www.diddywahdiddy.net/LupuNews/index2.html

turning all the options on
it seems to make my fonts flicker when viewed close up
does it offer improvements for LCD users or eyestrain?

666philb · #59 Post by **666philb** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 13:04

hi playdaze, in lupu 520 when copying files, the 'quiet' option did not work. Forcing you to click multiple times to overwrite stuff. Is it possible to fix this in luci251?

cheers 666philb

radky · #60 Post by **radky** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 14:44

Changing virtual desktops in JWM fails in Luci-251.

For JWM-500, the Desktops tag in jwmrc.personal has changed to a new width/height format, such as:

Code: Select all

<Desktops width="x" height="y"/>

However, jwmrc.personal in Luci-251 has the old Desktops tag, which JWM-500 does not recognize:

Code: Select all

<Desktops count="x"/>

Also, the corresponding configuration files in /usr/local/jwmconfig2/ should be updated, similar to 01micko’s modifications in Spup.

playdayz · #61 Post by **playdayz** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 16:01

What does the nosmp take away?

smp means "symmetric multi processor" or something like that. nosmp means only use one "core" so if you have a single core processor it doesn't take away anything at all.

playdayz · #62 Post by **playdayz** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 16:04

I'm using openssl-1.0.0d-w-20110209 without problems; needed it for TOR, but sylpheed and gftp is working.

You installed the pet, I am assuming. Have you tried to use the ssh2 mode in gftp? That's where it failed for me. Sometimes I have found that installing a pet does not give the same results as building it in from scratch, but this gives me an idea to try. Thanks.

Yes. When installing the pet, libcrypto 0.9.8 i still there, in addition to libcrypto 1.0.0, but libcrypto is too big to have both.

playdayz · #63 Post by **playdayz** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 16:33

hi playdaze, in lupu 520 when copying files, the 'quiet' option did not work. Forcing you to click multiple times to overwrite stuff. Is it possible to fix this in luci251?

Yes. It has been this way for a while at least. Does anyone know how to change it?

playdayz · #64 Post by **playdayz** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 16:35

Using the fontwizard.pet in 251
from Lucid news
http://www.diddywahdiddy.net/LupuNews/index2.html

turning all the options on
it seems to make my fonts flicker when viewed close up
does it offer improvements for LCD users or eyestrain?

Some people have reported that it does offer improvements. I have not tested.

runtt21 · #65 Post by **runtt21** » Sat 26 Feb 2011, 16:40

playdayz wrote:
hi playdaze, in lupu 520 when copying files, the 'quiet' option did not work. Forcing you to click multiple times to overwrite stuff. Is it possible to fix this in luci251?
Yes. It has been this way for a while at least. Does anyone know how to change it?

This is really a safety feature just to make sure your overwriting what you want overwritten.

(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

The Official Release of Lucid 5.25 (Lucid Five Twenty-Five)