No, it's based on the latest 520.rjbrewer wrote:That was after comments about Luci not being able to eject disk with 256mb ram. Wonder if "Studio" was based on one of those "problem" versions?
Yes, and yes.playdayz wrote:Does standard Lucid 5.2 Live-CD copy to ram on boot in that machine with 512MB ram?
I do remember that you said Studio does copy to ram on a machine with 1GB. Is that still the case?
Did you try it with the "puppy pfix=ram, copy" options? My test disc also loads into RAM when booted without those options. (I should have mentioned that earlier.)playdayz wrote:So, In a 512MB machine both the standard Lucid-52 LiveCD copied to ram and so did the remastered 181Mb Live-CD.
I only added a few archive files to make the sfs bigger, and nothing else. That was the whole point of the "experiment".playdayz wrote:Given these results I think it might be possible that there is something unique about the 170MB test disk that l0wt3ch made.
I will see what I can do.emil wrote:can you do a testrun with the 170 MB sfs and the initrd.gz I supplied ?
Thanks again to everyone.
If the ratio of RAM/size of sfs is "working properly", does that mean it was broken in 511? Because Studio 3.1 was 395 MB, and still loads properly with 512 MB of RAM.