Lucid Puppy 5.2 feedback and bug reports

Please post any bugs you have found
Message
Author
User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#46 Post by playdayz »

I am unable to mount any jfs drives with 5.2.


e2fsprogs was rolled back for older machines, try the one in Lucid Puppy News (link in the first post or from Quickpet)

Cheers

I have tried e2fsprogs-1.41.14-w5-20101224.pet and e2fsprogs_new-1.41.14-w5-20101224.pet found in the ibiblios lucid pets.

No change, jfs mount still not working, pmount(started from the terminal) sais:
"mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs'"
Smiley, Thanks for the sleuthing you did. This is the e2fsprogs from luci-243. As 01micko said, it makes sense that it would be e2fsprogs. This one was from maverick but as micko also said we reverted because some people had trouble with it. It is not the same as any that you have tried. After installing you should reboot to make sure.

<Add> You might try the jfsutils that are several messages below this first.
.
Last edited by playdayz on Tue 11 Jan 2011, 18:05, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bigpup
Posts: 13886
Joined: Sun 11 Oct 2009, 18:15
Location: S.C. USA

#47 Post by bigpup »

playdayz wrote:
I am unable to mount any jfs drives with 5.2.


e2fsprogs was rolled back for older machines, try the one in Lucid Puppy News (link in the first post or from Quickpet)

Cheers

I have tried e2fsprogs-1.41.14-w5-20101224.pet and e2fsprogs_new-1.41.14-w5-20101224.pet found in the ibiblios lucid pets.

No change, jfs mount still not working, pmount(started from the terminal) sais:
"mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs'"
Smiley, Thanks for the sleuthing you did. This is the e2fsprogs from luci-243. As 01micko said, it makes sense that it would be e2fsprogs. This one was from maverick but as micko said we reverted because some people had trouble with it. It is not the same as any that you have tried.
I noticed the Gparted in Lucid 5.2 does not have the ability to do a lot of formats. Is the above why?
Attachments
gparted format.png
Gparted format choices
(35.69 KiB) Downloaded 1962 times

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#48 Post by playdayz »

Smiley, What am I thinking. Here is the e2fsprogs from Lucid 511.

Sylvander
Posts: 4416
Joined: Mon 15 Dec 2008, 11:06
Location: West Lothian, Scotland, UK

#49 Post by Sylvander »

Within my Lupu-520, the "Open with..." in Xfe doesn't retain the file associations. :(
Never seen that problem before.

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#50 Post by playdayz »

Thanks for the clue Bigpup. I checked and lucid 5.1.1 was the same.

Smiley, try this one. It is the utilities for jfs. It allows gparted to format to jfs (bigpup's clue), so maybe it will allow jfs to be mounted.

smiley
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat 08 Jan 2011, 15:28
Location: Slovenia

jfs drive mounting

#51 Post by smiley »

playdayz wrote:Smiley, What am I thinking. Here is the e2fsprogs from Lucid 511.
Hi playdayz,

I have tried but I am still not able to mount jfs drives.
Did the reboot and jfsutils as I did before.

I don't think this e2fsprogs is the problem(or it can not be solved this way), I have remembered that when I was testing for jfs also ntfs-3g driver would not load(it used ntfs driver instead) due to something to do with "fuse", maybe this could be the problem?

I will try to reproduce that to be able to get to you the full error message.

Is there something else I can try/test to find the source of the problem?

Is there some kind of log to see what were the changes between versions?

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#52 Post by playdayz »

I don't think this e2fsprogs is the problem
I agree now. It is not the jfsutils either. I formatted a disk as jfs and could not mount it. I don't know. I have to think and experiment. I will look at fuse. Thanks.

smiley
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat 08 Jan 2011, 15:28
Location: Slovenia

jfs drive mounting

#53 Post by smiley »

playdayz wrote:
I don't think this e2fsprogs is the problem
I agree now. It is not the jfsutils either. I formatted a disk as jfs and could not mount it. I don't know. I have to think and experiment. I will look at fuse. Thanks.
I have also done some experimenting...

When you do upgrade from 5.1.1 the jfs mounting functions OK.
I have noticed that in directory /lib/modules/2.6.33.2/kernel/fs there are some directories missing from 5.2 like jfs and also fuse

I do not know anything about internal work in linux, but this is one lead of what is wrong here...

Is there some easy way to do a compare of directories for a newbie(tried meld but produces some errors...), so that I can see what are the differences between plain 5.2 installation and 5.2 over 5.1.1 upgrade?

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#54 Post by playdayz »

You found exactly the same thing I found. luci-242 had a zdrv and all the fs drivers were there, but when we switched back away something happened.

You might try copying the jfs folders to 5.2 and then run depmod and then reboot. I have a jfs partition now so I can test also.

We're close (I hope ;-)

smiley
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat 08 Jan 2011, 15:28
Location: Slovenia

jfs drive mounting

#55 Post by smiley »

playdayz wrote:You found exactly the same thing I found. luci-242 had a zdrv and all the fs drivers were there, but when we switched back away something happened.

You might try copying the jfs folders to 5.2 and then run depmod and then reboot. I have a jfs partition now so I can test also.

We're close (I hope ;-)
Thanks(did not know about the magic word "depmod" :) ), now it is working.
As you noticed there are also some other directories "missing" from there...

So this is a kinda quick fix, when you figure out what happened I presume there will be a "real" fix.

Thanks again, I have almost all the stuff on jfs drives.

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#56 Post by playdayz »

Thanks(did not know about the magic word "depmod" Smile ), now it is working
.

Oh that is good news. Here's what happened. When we were trying to shrink, around the time of 243, I checked a box that said "erase 'exotic' modules that are rarely needed." Guess what, the jfs modules were in that group that got erased. Since you are good, we now have the leisure to figure out the best permanent fix. Thanks.

smiley
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat 08 Jan 2011, 15:28
Location: Slovenia

#57 Post by smiley »

playdayz wrote: Since you are good, we now have the leisure to figure out the best permanent fix. Thanks.
From my point of view if this is fixed in the next version is fine by me, but I think it should be checked what else got erased. I think a lot of people use this Puppy linux CD as a quick rescue disk, so it is useful to support as much of the file systems as possible, at least those that are still used, jfs certainly is.

User avatar
MinHundHettePerro
Posts: 852
Joined: Thu 05 Feb 2009, 22:22
Location: SE

#58 Post by MinHundHettePerro »

Hello :)!

On JFS

Sorry, if I'm just coming in from the left here. just been building woof-pups for a fortnight (quite a few of them for experiment, and some kernel builds to go along).

Anyway, just my nooby woof thoughts :shock: :);
- JFS module did not disappear by me erasing exotic modules (don't have a jfs drive to test, though).
- in 3builddistro, one is first asked whether to put the modules in a zdrv, and then one is asked whether to delete built modules (to save space), upon which a depmod at first run should be needed.

And now, my confused conclusion :shock:, had the JFS-support been there if modules had been deleted (and therefore, a depmod at first run would have been performed)?

Please, ignore if it doesn't make any sense :)/
MHHP
[color=green]Celeron 2.8 GHz, 1 GB, i82845, many ptns, modes 12, 13
Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz, 1 GB, nvidia quadro nvs 285[/color]
Slackos & 214X, ... and Q6xx
[color=darkred]Nämen, vaf....[/color] [color=green]ln -s /dev/null MHHP[/color]

User avatar
MinHundHettePerro
Posts: 852
Joined: Thu 05 Feb 2009, 22:22
Location: SE

#59 Post by MinHundHettePerro »

duke93535 wrote:playdayz
What does it see? What do you see with htop (Menu -> System status -> htop) (how many cores?)[
When i run htop in quirky1.4 it sees all six cores and in lupu520 it only sees 4 cores.
Again, my nooby thoughts :shock:!

In lupu520's DOTconfig-k2.6.33.2-27MAY2010-LUPU-SMP-TICKLESS the following is specified

Code: Select all

CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4
while in Q140's DOTconfig-K2.6.31.14-25OCT2010 it is specified:

Code: Select all

CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8
Couldn't that config option be the culprit?

Again, please, ignore if I'm posting out of my league here :)/
MHHP
[color=green]Celeron 2.8 GHz, 1 GB, i82845, many ptns, modes 12, 13
Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz, 1 GB, nvidia quadro nvs 285[/color]
Slackos & 214X, ... and Q6xx
[color=darkred]Nämen, vaf....[/color] [color=green]ln -s /dev/null MHHP[/color]

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#60 Post by playdayz »

Does anyone have or know of "devices" that worked in 5.1.1 but not in Lucid 5.2?

Particularly that would be net devices such as wireless and filesystem devices such as odd filesystems.

If so, please give this a try: it is some Extra Drivers for 5.2 that were in 5.1.1 but were eliminated from 5.2 in the drive to shrink its size..
Last edited by playdayz on Wed 12 Jan 2011, 01:42, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#61 Post by playdayz »

In lupu520's DOTconfig-k2.6.33.2-27MAY2010-LUPU-SMP-TICKLESS the following is specified
Code:
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4

while in Q140's DOTconfig-K2.6.31.14-25OCT2010 it is specified:
Code:
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8

Couldn't that config option be the culprit?
Almost certainly, imho. These are from the kernel sources?
Anyway, just my nooby woof thoughts Shocked Smile;
- JFS module did not disappear by me erasing exotic modules (don't have a jfs drive to test, though).
The missing modules did reappear though when I unchecked Erase exotic modules ;-) They are in the pet above (but look in 520, they are not there)

User avatar
01micko
Posts: 8741
Joined: Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:39
Location: qld
Contact:

#62 Post by 01micko »

I'm keeping track here and posting the most important fixes in the main post.

So far there is
1)the jfs fix, also perhaps if there are other modules missing that may have been present in 51x
2) the unetbootin work around.

Cheers
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access

bones01
Posts: 371
Joined: Mon 11 Aug 2008, 07:47
Location: Melbourne, Aus

#63 Post by bones01 »

It's all working well for me. I had some trouble with 5.1.1 with some media programs not working and some missing deps. However, it's all working as it should with 5.2

Haven't come across things that worked in 5.1.1 but not 5.2. Even e-Sword minimizes and reopens, which is more than just a bit helpful.

Haven't tried Gimp yet, and that could be the problem. We'll see.

Good job everyone. Thanks for making it possible.

Bones
Dell Latitude D630 running Puppy 5.2.8 frugal, Macpup 525 frugal (if I can get it working again. Sadly, I couldn't get it fixed :? )
Precise Puppy 5.4 live DVD
Precise 5.7.3 on USB

bones01
Posts: 371
Joined: Mon 11 Aug 2008, 07:47
Location: Melbourne, Aus

#64 Post by bones01 »

playdayz wrote:Does anyone have or know of "devices" that worked in 5.1.1 but not in Lucid 5.2?

Particularly that would be net devices such as wireless and filesystem devices such as odd filesystems.
Hi Playdayz

I don't know if this is the sort of thing you're thinking of, but the battery monitor (?) on the task bar isn't working. This is the first time I've used it unpowered since installing 5.2 so only just realised it isn't working. Hopefully I'll be finished before the battery is :)

Bones
Dell Latitude D630 running Puppy 5.2.8 frugal, Macpup 525 frugal (if I can get it working again. Sadly, I couldn't get it fixed :? )
Precise Puppy 5.4 live DVD
Precise 5.7.3 on USB

User avatar
bignono1
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun 17 May 2009, 07:30
Location: Q8

#65 Post by bignono1 »

I have a menu problem in jwm, the Openpox wm is ok.
When i go : Menu\Desktop\Desktop Settings, then the submenu does not go to the wright direction, it goes to the left as in the attachment.
Fixmenus did not fix it, any idea?
-----------------------
Please forgive my bad English.

Post Reply