Author |
Message |
ICPUG
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 1307 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon 08 Nov 2010, 08:39 Post subject:
|
|
Thank you shinobar for the extra info.
I finally got the bcedit manual (original version, not the latest) in pdf form. A quick look did not help me to understand when 'device boot' was needed. Your info did!
This little extra 100M partition is a bit of a nuisance. I knew about it before and I also know it can be avoided if you install Windows 7 very carefully. Even though I used a dedicated computer retailer I find my machine has this little extra partition. Apart from wasting one of the 4 allowed primary partitions I hope that somewhere there is some info I can find which explains in detail the Win 7 boot process and what the purpose of this little extra partition is.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
noryb009
Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Posts: 626
|
Posted: Mon 08 Nov 2010, 16:24 Post subject:
|
|
ICPUG: I think it's so that people can't delete the boot loader, so it's easier to repair if people start deleting everything.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ICPUG
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 1307 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue 09 Nov 2010, 09:24 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks noryb.
I have been doing some more searching and apparently the small partition incorporates the Windows Recovery Environment. If Windows 7 does not boot properly a flag does not get reset. Next time you boot the flag is detected and you are booted into that small partition.
Since, with Windows XP, one needed an install disk to get the recovery environment, which lots of PCs didn't have, this small partition is an improvement!
If you install Windows 7 in a set way this environment will be placed in a folder on the main partition instead of creating a separate partition.
The small partition may also be used for bitlocker encryption but as I don't have an enterprise edition Windows 7 that is not something I am going to investigate!
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
shinobar

Joined: 28 May 2009 Posts: 2674 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed 10 Nov 2010, 10:09 Post subject:
Success with Windows Xp |
|
A success report from bodbozzle of the Lucid-Puppy-Quickset-511-installer.exe with Windows Xp.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=60199&start=53
_________________ Downloads for Puppy Linux http://shino.pos.to/linux/downloads.html
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
olgaritmo
Joined: 10 Nov 2010 Posts: 2 Location: Bologna, Italy
|
Posted: Wed 10 Nov 2010, 13:06 Post subject:
not working on windows ME Subject description: lupuq installer not working on Windows Millennium Edition |
|
lupu Quickset is a treat which revived my old laptop with no international keyboard setting hassles (the reason why I gave up lupu 511)! You made me an happy environment friendly pc user! Anyway, I tried the installer on WinME but unfortunately it didn't work.
Best regards and I'll keep in touch!
Olga Ritmo
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
noryb009
Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Posts: 626
|
Posted: Wed 10 Nov 2010, 19:34 Post subject:
|
|
I just looked it up, and while it runs the same way as 9x, Microsoft removed the boot loader to save a few seconds on startup. This makes it almost impossible to have GRUB installed without editing the MBR, which means I will have to not support Windows ME.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
shinobar

Joined: 28 May 2009 Posts: 2674 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed 10 Nov 2010, 23:58 Post subject:
Windows ME |
|
noryb009 wrote: | I will have to not support Windows ME. |
Thanks olgaritmo and noryb. Important information.
Found Wubi also does not support Windows ME.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WubiGuide#Unsupported set-ups
Unetbootin ... Ah, does not support any of Windows 9x/Me.
http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/
_________________ Downloads for Puppy Linux http://shino.pos.to/linux/downloads.html
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
emil
Joined: 10 Nov 2009 Posts: 631 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Tue 23 Nov 2010, 19:02 Post subject:
Used method for 580 MB puplet - works |
|
Thank you noryb009,
short success-story; I used the method to make an exe installer from an 580 MB pupplet. I tested it successfully now on a XP and a Windows 7 machine.
Technically I had no problem, but I had to resize peronal storage file 2 times, because everything runs in folder /root/.wine (and you need place for puppy-sfs AND exe file)
is there any possibility to use another directory for the build process (i.e on out of the personal storage file).
Second (small) problem I had when I did "Test Installer" after the creation Process. I had Grub installed before, but this was wiped and afterwards I could only boot to XP (couldn't see my Linux partitions anymore). Luckily I had stored some Puppy iso files on my Windows Partition, so I could revive my computer via USB install. So maybe my example should be a WARNING to others.
cheers and thanks!
emil
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
noryb009
Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Posts: 626
|
Posted: Tue 23 Nov 2010, 20:00 Post subject:
|
|
emil: Thanks a lot for helping test.
Quote: | is there any possibility to use another directory for the build process (i.e on out of the personal storage file). |
I'll test a symlink to a hard drive. Thanks for the suggestion!
Quote: | Second (small) problem I had when I did "Test Installer" after the creation Process. I had Grub installed before, but this was wiped and afterwards I could only boot to XP (couldn't see my Linux partitions anymore). Luckily I had stored some Puppy iso files on my Windows Partition, so I could revive my computer via USB install. So maybe my example should be a WARNING to others. |
I'm not sure what happened. Did you run the installer in Puppy? It should have just crashed and burned. Do you have GRUB installed to the MBR?
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
emil
Joined: 10 Nov 2009 Posts: 631 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Tue 23 Nov 2010, 20:20 Post subject:
installer |
|
I am also not sure what happend, the exe was created successfully.
But then I think I ran the installer in Puppy with wine still installed (or did I just press the "Test Installer" Button, I cant remember).
I had old grub (not grub4dos) installed on the machine and various puppies and also an old Windows XP install in the menu. My plan was to reboot, then start up Winows XP, and run the installer to test it. But it never entered Grub menu, it went directly to XP (first in sort of recovery mode).
So I reccomend: don't run the exe from inside puppy when you have wine installed and dont press the "Test installer" button of the nsis exe creator programm, until this is resolved.
I still have to reinstall GRUB and get my old boot options back , but no problem.
noryb09 - i think this is the easiest possibility to get puppy running on a computer (most have windows installed), in fact its much easier than burning CD's and messing with USB sticks. Big cudoz for this technique - BIG achievment !!! I think everybody can download a file and click on it!
emil
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
emil
Joined: 10 Nov 2009 Posts: 631 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed 24 Nov 2010, 16:16 Post subject:
64 Bit Windows 7 |
|
Will there be a problem if the installer runs on a 64 Bit Windows machine?
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
noryb009
Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Posts: 626
|
Posted: Wed 24 Nov 2010, 16:33 Post subject:
|
|
It should work with 64 bit, I don't see any reason why it wouldn't.
Ok, I'll just add that to the main post.
Thanks a lot!
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
emil
Joined: 10 Nov 2009 Posts: 631 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Thu 25 Nov 2010, 06:00 Post subject:
How it works |
|
Hello, may I just ask a quick question:
I am not sure if I got it right how it works:
It checks windows/bottloader version
if xp: it changes the boot.ini
if Vista or Windows 7: it uses bcdedit to change the boot entry (like explained above)
if 9x: I dont know
if an existing grub is found: it stops and asks you to edit the menu.lst manually
then it installs grub4dos, but after the windows bootloader, so you can have 2 menus consecutive bootmenus (1.st on from windows, 2nd one from grub)
it WILL NOT change the mbr!
is this roughly right (especially the part about not changing the mbr)? Sorry about my sloppy terminology.
emil
PS; just for the reccord, while googling yesterday I found EassyBCD which is a free windows gui for editing the boot entries.
http://neosmart.net/dl.php?id=1
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
noryb009
Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Posts: 626
|
Posted: Thu 25 Nov 2010, 20:20 Post subject:
|
|
That's roughly right. It DOES NOT change the MBR.
Quote: | if 9x: I dont know |
It does something with the config.sys or something, or only got it working because of Lin'n'Win.
Quote: | if an existing grub is found: it stops and asks you to edit the menu.lst manually |
Not exactly, it automaticly adds the entry to the bootloader.
I saw EasyBCD before, but I'm not using it because:
- I already have it working OK
- I'm not sure if it takes command
- I'm not sure if the installer can unzip it, and run it without touching the system much.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ICPUG
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 1307 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri 26 Nov 2010, 08:54 Post subject:
|
|
Emil,
Have a look at the Lin'N'Win notes to see precisely what happens for Windows 9x and Windows XP. Noryb009 has taken my manual procedure and automated it!
I will be updating Lin'N'Win soon with the Windows 7 technique of Noryb009.
The Lin'N'Win notes can be found here:
http://www.icpug.org.uk/national/linnwin/step00-linnwin.htm
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|