Quirky 1.2 feedback

Please post any bugs you have found
Post Reply
Message
Author
jpeps
Posts: 3179
Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 19:00

#16 Post by jpeps »

re: "jerky video"

Try this:
1. Install nvidia-195.36.15-k2.6.33.2-1-q from the PPM
2. exit to prompt. Rerun xorgwizard, and "probe"

This worked for me; the radeon driver used the extra libs supplied with nvidia, and flash now works.
Last edited by jpeps on Sat 05 Jun 2010, 18:48, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
rcrsn51
Posts: 13096
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 13:50
Location: Stratford, Ontario

#17 Post by rcrsn51 »

Kal wrote:Hi rcrsn51:

When you reboot it’s back. Because it makes a new modprobe.conf back in /etc.

Code: Select all

WARNING: Deprecated config file /etc/modprobe.conf, all config files belong into /etc/modprobe.d/.
PS: I am not using this modprobe.conf, so I just remove it with a remove line in rc.sysinit, which I know is not the correct way to do it.
So much for thorough testing on my part. :wink:

I guess BarryK will have to look at this.

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#18 Post by James C »

Have made 2 new fresh frugal installs of Quirky 120...........one on my old P3 test box (733 mhz/256 mb ram/1 gb swap) and the other install on my main Linux box (Athlon XP 2.0 ghz/1 gb ram/1 gb swap).

Both installs appear to be working correctly so far........although I have a cpu temp indicator in the tray on the Athlon box but not on the old P3.Not really important though since both are desktops. :)

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

Re: quirky 1.20 jerky video

#19 Post by James C »

Béèm wrote:
So to keep the temp lower, I did put min at 0,6GHz and max at 1,0GHz
I see the cpu runs at 1,0GHz and temp is good, but the youtube video Fireflies runs very jerky.
I just tried that video on both computers,side by side.The old P3 was very jerky but the faster cpu played it perfectly.I wonder what the magic cpu speed is for smooth streaming video?

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#20 Post by nooby »

Q1.20 works good on my HP/Compaq. Have not tested to do spotify on Wine but if it works in Q1.00 I trust it would work on the 1.20 too Am I wrong?

I am too lazy to install everything over to 1.2 from 1.0. I am very satisfied with Q1.

The only thing I miss on Q1 are the Quickpet thing.

Is that possible to make available?

Why I don't use Lucid Puppy 5.00? Because trying to run Spotify in wine kills it each time.
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

User avatar
Béèm
Posts: 11763
Joined: Wed 22 Nov 2006, 00:47
Location: Brussels IBM Thinkpad R40, 256MB, 20GB, WiFi ipw2100. Frugal Lin'N'Win

Re: quirky 1.20 jerky video

#21 Post by Béèm »

rjbrewer wrote: Only solution I ever found was to download the youtube vids.
as mp4.
That's not a solution.
This issue (high temperature) has started some versions ago, whether it is now quirky or lucid.
So the question is, what is happening.
Should we all go back to Windows? (bwerk)
So my impression is, that there is a serious flaw in the concept of quirky (and lucid). For me this has started in quirky and now lucid is 'contaminated' as well.

Why should one be forced to reduce his cpu frequency in order to get the temp down?
Do you think distrowatch will be happy once they realize this issue?
Time savers:
Find packages in a snap and install using Puppy Package Manager (Menu).
[url=http://puppylinux.org/wikka/HomePage]Consult Wikka[/url]
Use peppyy's [url=http://wellminded.com/puppy/pupsearch.html]puppysearch[/url]

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#22 Post by nooby »

Do we know if the rise of temperature is real or a software bug that report high temp which is not that high in reality?

Is it related to the fans not running despite they should start at a certain temperature? Is there any independent way to confirm it is making the circuits dangerous hot?

I am too lazy to spend time on it but to check my gut feeling.

I went to google and put this in the search

linux "high temperature"

Several answer do indicate quirky are not entirely alone?
But I want to know what is going on too. I ahve three computers with laptop chips and they scream warning of high temp within a minute of being booted on the newest quirkies.
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

User avatar
rjbrewer
Posts: 4405
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008, 21:41
Location: merriam, kansas

Re: quirky 1.20 jerky video

#23 Post by rjbrewer »

Béèm wrote:
rjbrewer wrote: Only solution I ever found was to download the youtube vids.
as mp4.
That's not a solution.
This issue (high temperature) has started some versions ago, whether it is now quirky or lucid.
So the question is, what is happening.
Should we all go back to Windows? (bwerk)
So my impression is, that there is a serious flaw in the concept of quirky (and lucid). For me this has started in quirky and now lucid is 'contaminated' as well.

Why should one be forced to reduce his cpu frequency in order to get the temp down?
Do you think distrowatch will be happy once they realize this issue?
The subject was jerky video.
That has to do with hardware mostly.
Scaling the cpu lower does not explain the disparity between
the older and newer versions heatwise.

Inspiron 700m, Pent.M 1.6Ghz, 1Gb ram.
Msi Wind U100, N270 1.6>2.0Ghz, 1.5Gb ram.
Eeepc 8g 701, 900Mhz, 1Gb ram.
Full installs

User avatar
Béèm
Posts: 11763
Joined: Wed 22 Nov 2006, 00:47
Location: Brussels IBM Thinkpad R40, 256MB, 20GB, WiFi ipw2100. Frugal Lin'N'Win

Re: quirky 1.20 jerky video

#24 Post by Béèm »

rjbrewer wrote:
Béèm wrote:
rjbrewer wrote: Only solution I ever found was to download the youtube vids.
as mp4.
That's not a solution.
This issue (high temperature) has started some versions ago, whether it is now quirky or lucid.
So the question is, what is happening.
Should we all go back to Windows? (bwerk)
So my impression is, that there is a serious flaw in the concept of quirky (and lucid). For me this has started in quirky and now lucid is 'contaminated' as well.

Why should one be forced to reduce his cpu frequency in order to get the temp down?
Do you think distrowatch will be happy once they realize this issue?
The subject was jerky video.
That has to do with hardware mostly.
Scaling the cpu lower does not explain the disparity between
the older and newer versions heatwise.
I don't agree.
The lower the CPU frequency, the lower the temperature, but also the more jerky a video plays.
I didn't have the issue in the early quirkies and lucid's.
I didn't have the issue in 4.3.x

What has changed?
Maybe the kernel version with it's driver modules?
Time savers:
Find packages in a snap and install using Puppy Package Manager (Menu).
[url=http://puppylinux.org/wikka/HomePage]Consult Wikka[/url]
Use peppyy's [url=http://wellminded.com/puppy/pupsearch.html]puppysearch[/url]

User avatar
rjbrewer
Posts: 4405
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008, 21:41
Location: merriam, kansas

Re: quirky 1.20 jerky video

#25 Post by rjbrewer »

Béèm wrote:
rjbrewer wrote:
Béèm wrote:That's not a solution.
This issue (high temperature) has started some versions ago, whether it is now quirky or lucid.
So the question is, what is happening.
Should we all go back to Windows? (bwerk)
So my impression is, that there is a serious flaw in the concept of quirky (and lucid). For me this has started in quirky and now lucid is 'contaminated' as well.

Why should one be forced to reduce his cpu frequency in order to get the temp down?
Do you think distrowatch will be happy once they realize this issue?
The subject was jerky video.
That has to do with hardware mostly.
Scaling the cpu lower does not explain the disparity between
the older and newer versions heatwise.
I don't agree.
The lower the CPU frequency, the lower the temperature, but also the more jerky a video plays.
I didn't have the issue in the early quirkies and lucid's.
I didn't have the issue in 4.3.x

What has changed?
Maybe the kernel version with it's driver modules?
We are not actually disagreeing.
Just looking at it from 2 different angles.

Inspiron 700m, Pent.M 1.6Ghz, 1Gb ram.
Msi Wind U100, N270 1.6>2.0Ghz, 1.5Gb ram.
Eeepc 8g 701, 900Mhz, 1Gb ram.
Full installs

User avatar
rjbrewer
Posts: 4405
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008, 21:41
Location: merriam, kansas

#26 Post by rjbrewer »

jpeps wrote:re: "jerky video"

Try this:
1. Install nvidia-195.36.15-k2.6.33.2-1-q from the PPM
2. exit to prompt. Rerun xorgwizard, and "probe"

This worked for me; the radeon driver used the extra libs supplied with nvidia, and flash now works.
Exactly which part of the PPM did you find those drivers in?

Inspiron 700m, Pent.M 1.6Ghz, 1Gb ram.
Msi Wind U100, N270 1.6>2.0Ghz, 1.5Gb ram.
Eeepc 8g 701, 900Mhz, 1Gb ram.
Full installs

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#27 Post by James C »

rjbrewer wrote:
jpeps wrote:re: "jerky video"

Try this:
1. Install nvidia-195.36.15-k2.6.33.2-1-q from the PPM
2. exit to prompt. Rerun xorgwizard, and "probe"

This worked for me; the radeon driver used the extra libs supplied with nvidia, and flash now works.
Exactly which part of the PPM did you find those drivers in?
Quirky repo.....desktop section. :)
Attachments
nvidia.png
(136.1 KiB) Downloaded 1997 times

User avatar
rjbrewer
Posts: 4405
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008, 21:41
Location: merriam, kansas

#28 Post by rjbrewer »

Thanks James C

That's the last place I would have thought of looking. :)

edit;

Nvidea made no noticeable difference with ati mobility m3 agp 2x
It's not a Radeon
Last edited by rjbrewer on Sat 05 Jun 2010, 22:39, edited 2 times in total.

Inspiron 700m, Pent.M 1.6Ghz, 1Gb ram.
Msi Wind U100, N270 1.6>2.0Ghz, 1.5Gb ram.
Eeepc 8g 701, 900Mhz, 1Gb ram.
Full installs

User avatar
rcrsn51
Posts: 13096
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 13:50
Location: Stratford, Ontario

#29 Post by rcrsn51 »

Kal wrote:Hi rcrsn51:
When you reboot it’s back. Because it makes a new modprobe.conf back in /etc.
Here is a better short-term solution.

Locate the file /usr/local/cpu-freq/cpu_func and open it in a text editor.

Line 15 currently says

Code: Select all

if [ ! "`cat /tmp/modprobe_module.tmp`" ] ; then
Change it to

Code: Select all

if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
Make sure you leave spaces on either side of the [ ] characters.

drblock2
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon 19 Jan 2009, 12:38

Persistant problems

#30 Post by drblock2 »

Downloaded and installed Quirky 1.2 along with my save file from 1.2rc. The save file was updated quickly and sound, flash video, ethernet network and local LAN worked right out of the box.

I had to delete and reinstall my HP 6P laserjet to enable printing via samba, but this was no problem.

Unfortunately, the problems reported here: http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... 085#422085 have not been resolved in the new version. Just to summarize:

1. Geany is still not able to open files on an smb mounted drive. Geany 0.19 has not resolved this - the problem did not appear with Puppy 4.31 and Geany 0.18.

2. Printing to a ps-file via CUPS-PDF still has no upper-left margin.

3. A shell script !#bin/sh does not start on booting despite link form executable in path to /root/Startup. (Say . . . this folder contains traytemp and start_cpu_freq as well. Do you suppose this might have something to do with the temperature problems?)

User avatar
Béèm
Posts: 11763
Joined: Wed 22 Nov 2006, 00:47
Location: Brussels IBM Thinkpad R40, 256MB, 20GB, WiFi ipw2100. Frugal Lin'N'Win

#31 Post by Béèm »

jpeps wrote:re: "jerky video"

Try this:
1. Install nvidia-195.36.15-k2.6.33.2-1-q from the PPM
2. exit to prompt. Rerun xorgwizard, and "probe"

This worked for me; the radeon driver used the extra libs supplied with nvidia, and flash now works.
Thanks for the info.
But it's a 72MB install to get a few libs for the radeon driving.
It would be nice to know which libs it are and only install those as the rest of the package is not needed for a ATI/Radeon video controller.
Time savers:
Find packages in a snap and install using Puppy Package Manager (Menu).
[url=http://puppylinux.org/wikka/HomePage]Consult Wikka[/url]
Use peppyy's [url=http://wellminded.com/puppy/pupsearch.html]puppysearch[/url]

User avatar
rcrsn51
Posts: 13096
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 13:50
Location: Stratford, Ontario

Re: Persistant problems

#32 Post by rcrsn51 »

drblock2 wrote: Printing to a ps-file via CUPS-PDF still has no upper-left margin.
Can you give an example? What application are you printing from? This appears to work for me. Instead of using the CUPS-PDF driver, have you tried using "Print to File"? Most applications have this print option.
A shell script !#bin/sh does not start on booting despite link form executable in path to /root/Startup.
Can you give an example? This also works for me. Have you declared the script file executable?

Kal
Posts: 626
Joined: Thu 05 May 2005, 16:59
Location: California, High Desert

#33 Post by Kal »

rcrsn51 wrote:
Here is a better short-term solution.

Locate the file /usr/local/cpu-freq/cpu_func and open it in a text editor.

Line 15 currently says
Code:
if [ ! "`cat /tmp/modprobe_module.tmp`" ] ; then

Change it to
Code:
if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
Oh well, that didn’t work, but, thanks for trying. Back to deleting modprobe.conf after the fact in rc.sysinit.

Thanks again, Kal

jpeps
Posts: 3179
Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 19:00

#34 Post by jpeps »

Béèm wrote:
jpeps wrote:re: "jerky video"

Try this:
1. Install nvidia-195.36.15-k2.6.33.2-1-q from the PPM
2. exit to prompt. Rerun xorgwizard, and "probe"

This worked for me; the radeon driver used the extra libs supplied with nvidia, and flash now works.
Thanks for the info.
But it's a 72MB install to get a few libs for the radeon driving.
It would be nice to know which libs it are and only install those as the rest of the package is not needed for a ATI/Radeon video controller.
I think you just need it for the setup, and can then uninstall it.

User avatar
01micko
Posts: 8741
Joined: Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:39
Location: qld
Contact:

#35 Post by 01micko »

Hi

qrky-120, quick test.

2 bugs and a nuisance per sé

Installed Firefox 3.6.4beta from the repo, only Ibiblio seems to work (nuisance)

Bug1
Firefox failed to run

Code: Select all

mozilla: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so: undefined symbol: _Z20js_NextActiveContextP9JSRuntimeP9JSContext
:?

Bug2
Seamonkey now fails to run from the menu, both FF and SM run from "mozilla" command which I guess picks up the first one alphabetically.

Cheers
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access

Post Reply