Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Sat 22 Nov 2014, 05:23
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Announcements
British wireless internet users - you're guilty!
Moderators: Flash, Ian, JohnMurga
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
Page 1 of 1 Posts_count  
Author Message
Aitch


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 6825
Location: Chatham, Kent, UK

PostPosted: Thu 04 Mar 2010, 15:42    Post_subject:  British wireless internet users - you're guilty!  

Proposed new legislation, due to pressure from the anti-copying lobby, suggest it will become law that you are assumed to be copying before you log on to the internet & therefore monitoring of your wireless use will be compulsorily made

Doug Hanchard wrote:
The home of the Magna Carta may wind up being a digital police state. You will be assumed to be guilty of copyright violation before you log on. The government clearly believes that pub owners, hotels, business people and consumers simply cannot be trusted. If you can’t provide Identification, network management tools and filtering of Internet content for your wireless service, you will not be allowed to offer it. As this unfolds, new questions arise regarding privacy rights (yes /no?) and how this potentially impacts future innovation in the U.K.

If this legislation passes in its current form, Britain’s digital privacy rights will be non-existent.


http://government.zdnet.com/?p=7414&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ZDNetBlogs+%28ZDNet+All+Blogs%29&utm_content=Twitter

Terrible link, sorry

More, may be the same news?

Doug Hanchard wrote:
In an obscene move, the British Government’s upcoming legislation, the Digital Economy Bill, a key part of law which will reduce abuse of Internet access such as illegal peer-to-peer networking and copyright infringement, may force public wireless access points out of use.

The proposed law, according to CrunchGear, would essentially impose “impossibly high levels of copyright protection by libraries and small businesses” which would make wireless access points useless by providing open and unrestricted access to the web.


http://blogs.zdnet.com/igeneration/?p=4219

The Digital Economy Bill's Progress

http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2009-10/digitaleconomy.html


Also, nasty

Insurance companies want to access your Facebook!!

http://government.zdnet.com/?p=7442

WAKE UP, ENGLAND!!

SHOUT YOUR OBJECTIONS - while you can!!

Paul McCartney, Elton John and others have

http://boingboing.net/2009/09/04/british-musicians---.html

The 3 strikes copyright rule is being pushed Globally!

Quote:
Previously:

* French "three-strikes" copyright law passes -- but may be dead ...
* France's three-strikes copyright rule is unconstitutional and ...
* New Zealand ready to reintroduce "three strikes" copyright rule ...
* Three strikes proposal for print - Boing Boing
* South Korea prepares to nuke its technological competitiveness ...
* UK govt proposes idiotic two-strikes-and-you're-out Internet ...
* French Parliament Say Non to Sarkozy-style "Three Strikes ...
* Three strikes you're out - Boing Boing



Please comment!

Am I the only one horrified by the warnings implicit in this?

Aitch Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
dogle

Joined: 11 Oct 2007
Posts: 353

PostPosted: Thu 18 Mar 2010, 18:43    Post_subject:  

No you are not, but

Quote:
SHOUT YOUR OBJECTIONS - while you can!!


no shouts seem to have been heard for some while now ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
Aitch


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 6825
Location: Chatham, Kent, UK

PostPosted: Fri 19 Mar 2010, 00:44    Post_subject:  

Didn't expect any different

Too busy feeding and walking their puppies, this lot..... Wink

One day, there'll be a realisation.....






Poof, where's everyone gone.......?

Aitch Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
sidders

Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 470
Location: Bolton, uk

PostPosted: Fri 19 Mar 2010, 04:12    Post_subject:  

I've been shouting here, at my MP

http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/speakout/extremeinternetl
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
dogle

Joined: 11 Oct 2007
Posts: 353

PostPosted: Fri 19 Mar 2010, 12:07    Post_subject:  

Good on ya, sidders.

The proforma screed offered by 38degrees might carry a little more punch if varied to read something like:
"because it will allow anonymous, non-accountable officials to disconnect people merely on unfounded suspicion of copyright infringement."
"Do you not think this abrogates the HR Act 'Freedom to receive information'?"

& for Opposition MPs:
"Should the Government succeed in forcing through this pernicious measure, will you seek to repeal it without delay on your return to power?"

(The b?ggers are trying to stop us downloading our Puppys! .... now, back to my Escape Committee duties ...)
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
Aitch


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 6825
Location: Chatham, Kent, UK

PostPosted: Fri 19 Mar 2010, 12:29    Post_subject:  

Thanks Sidders,

I was going to add about the demo at Parliament on the 24th, but now people have a link, or see here

http://www.openrightsgroup.org/campaigns/disconnection

Mandelson is an oversized rat! Wink

[Who said that? Laughing Laughing ]

Aitch Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
bugman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2131
Location: buffalo commons

PostPosted: Fri 19 Mar 2010, 13:34    Post_subject:  

this lets me off the hook

[dialup and 240 gigs of illegal downloads]

_________________
. . . the machines are clean
and the machines are not corrupted


- lee "scratch" perry
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message Visit_website 
Aitch


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 6825
Location: Chatham, Kent, UK

PostPosted: Fri 19 Mar 2010, 20:53    Post_subject:  

Bugsy, with all your books, I'd have thought you know all about copyright

But it's your music collection they'll be after....

btw all

The public domain

http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter8/index.html

Aitch Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
bugman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2131
Location: buffalo commons

PostPosted: Fri 19 Mar 2010, 20:59    Post_subject:  

oh i know about copyright

in jamaican music, it's what producers use to steal from artists

hell, most of what i have is out of print anyways, so . . .

Cool

_________________
. . . the machines are clean
and the machines are not corrupted


- lee "scratch" perry
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message Visit_website 
Aitch


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 6825
Location: Chatham, Kent, UK

PostPosted: Sat 20 Mar 2010, 12:29    Post_subject:  

Yep, know what you mean about that

I came across Desmond Decker, in London, pretty much in the gutter a good few years ago, because HE didn't get his royalties

I'd be interested in seeing the figures they keep talking about for 'lost revenue from copiers' as to the amount artists make in relation to labels/producers, and copyright 'collection agencies' [you know, the vultures and vampires Wink ]

It used to be something like 2-2.5% when I was in the music business.....

"Excuse me, wannabe artist, would you sign on the dotted line, we want to own 97/98% of you...that'll do nicely...when you sell millions of records, you'll get loads of royalties...tee hee [we just won't let you think about our slice of you, 'cause you'll be famous - but we'll be rich!]"

or something similar.... Wink

Aitch Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
bugman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2131
Location: buffalo commons

PostPosted: Sat 20 Mar 2010, 12:40    Post_subject:  

there's a story floating around, can't remember who [cornell campbell comes to mind] about the time coxsone dodd [studio one] paid him in ice cream

Rolling Eyes

_________________
. . . the machines are clean
and the machines are not corrupted


- lee "scratch" perry
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message Visit_website 
Aitch


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 6825
Location: Chatham, Kent, UK

PostPosted: Sat 20 Mar 2010, 20:19    Post_subject:  

Do you suppose we could pay for copying like that, too....?

Aitch Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
bugman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2131
Location: buffalo commons

PostPosted: Sun 21 Mar 2010, 06:45    Post_subject:  

property is theft, it's better to [file-] share
_________________
. . . the machines are clean
and the machines are not corrupted


- lee "scratch" perry
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message Visit_website 
Display_posts:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 Posts_count  
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Announcements
Jump to:  

Rules_post_cannot
Rules_reply_cannot
Rules_edit_cannot
Rules_delete_cannot
Rules_vote_cannot
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0765s ][ Queries: 11 (0.0045s) ][ GZIP on ]