Posted: Tue 19 Mar 2013, 09:03
glipper-lite revision 284 will replace glipper in the next release of Fatdog. Thank you.
Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue 18 Nov 2014, 18:59
Is there any new pet for Glipper-lite (Latest Glipper version is 2.4 and has plugins)
Posted: Tue 18 Nov 2014, 20:42
Glipper is now written in Python, so no, there won't be a version corresponding to it.
Amigo did say he saw the plugin support was added before the switch to Python, but I didn't look at it because the plugins were still in Python I think. I guess I can have another look after my current project. But you may find the "action" support in Parcellite suits your purposes...
Amigo did say he saw the plugin support was added before the switch to Python, but I didn't look at it because the plugins were still in Python I think. I guess I can have another look after my current project. But you may find the "action" support in Parcellite suits your purposes...
Posted: Sat 25 Jun 2016, 02:06
disciple, hi!
?do you have the lateat source code for this packages up somewhere, I'm trying to build on T2 system and it's failing badly with the version up there.
I thought maybe it's a version thing as i'm trying to build on x86-64.
thanks
?do you have the lateat source code for this packages up somewhere, I'm trying to build on T2 system and it's failing badly with the version up there.
I thought maybe it's a version thing as i'm trying to build on x86-64.
thanks
Posted: Sat 25 Jun 2016, 03:35
I know of at least this fork:
https://github.com/AlisterH/glipper-lit ... ipper-lite
Which uses the builtin gtkbuilder xml instead of glade xml (or my C code version)
I think that was from the latest google code repo source.
https://github.com/AlisterH/glipper-lit ... ipper-lite
Which uses the builtin gtkbuilder xml instead of glade xml (or my C code version)
I think that was from the latest google code repo source.
Posted: Sat 25 Jun 2016, 04:15
That one's me, and you're right, I haven't done anything more since I put it up on google code.
Posted: Sun 26 Jun 2016, 03:22
OK thanks i'll have a go with that one before trying your patience further as it's technosaurus's one that is failing to build x86-64, but it's ok 32bit.
Posted: Mon 26 Aug 2019, 07:56
Until yesterdaydisciple wrote:That one's me, and you're right, I haven't done anything more since I put it up on google code.
It will be in the upcoming raspup buster which I'm working on as we read.
Posted: Sun 15 Sep 2019, 10:14
Thanks for that micko. I'm surprised I only partially stripped help out of the gui - maybe I intended to reimplement it, but I think it is actually completely unnecessarily.