| Author |
Message |
technosaurus

Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 3845
|
Posted: Wed 03 Feb 2010, 21:36 Post_subject:
|
|
the last thing that tries to load in a rhapsody plugin
/root/.mozilla/plugins/nprhapengine.so
google turns up a lot of segfaults with it
_________________ Puppy Web Desktop Now with pet packages - Pet Packaging 100 & 101
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Colonel Panic

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 1235
|
Posted: Thu 04 Feb 2010, 06:17 Post_subject:
|
|
I tried it but I'm apparently missing a file called libenchant.so.1. Has anyone else had this problem?
_________________ Pentium III/866 Coppermine, 512 MB of RAM, 30 GB hard drive running Puppy Diamond 5.28 and Puppy Wary 5.3.92.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
technosaurus

Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 3845
|
Posted: Thu 04 Feb 2010, 09:07 Post_subject:
|
|
@colonel panic
use petget to install enchant and either ispell, aspell or myspell - these should be included on pretty much every puppy, so you must have a stripped down puplet
_________________ Puppy Web Desktop Now with pet packages - Pet Packaging 100 & 101
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Colonel Panic

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 1235
|
Posted: Thu 04 Feb 2010, 10:23 Post_subject:
|
|
| technosaurus wrote: | @colonel panic
use petget to install enchant and either ispell, aspell or myspell - these should be included on pretty much every puppy, so you must have a stripped down puplet |
Thanks for your advice. I've got enchant now, but the puppy repo doesn't have any of the spell packages - at least, they aren't visible in the petget listing.
_________________ Pentium III/866 Coppermine, 512 MB of RAM, 30 GB hard drive running Puppy Diamond 5.28 and Puppy Wary 5.3.92.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
technosaurus

Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 3845
|
Posted: Thu 04 Feb 2010, 16:59 Post_subject:
|
|
I think that the enchant package has 1 or 2 smaller spell packages already (probably ispell?) The important thing... is it working now, regardless of spell check?
_________________ Puppy Web Desktop Now with pet packages - Pet Packaging 100 & 101
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
abushcrafter

Joined: 30 Oct 2009 Posts: 1447 Location: England
|
Posted: Thu 04 Feb 2010, 18:52 Post_subject:
|
|
Fixed the icons but it still segmentation faults . The tango icons pack was smaller then I though/took less time to download .
| Description |
|

Download |
| Filename |
midori_fixed-icons_seg-faults.bz2 |
| Filesize |
21.76 KB |
| Downloaded |
332 Time(s) |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
technosaurus

Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 3845
|
Posted: Thu 04 Feb 2010, 20:58 Post_subject:
|
|
please read my previous response on rhapsody plugin
_________________ Puppy Web Desktop Now with pet packages - Pet Packaging 100 & 101
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Colonel Panic

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 1235
|
Posted: Fri 05 Feb 2010, 04:34 Post_subject:
|
|
I tried it again in 4.30, and got this error message;
midori: symbol lookup error: midori: undefined symbol: g_resolver_get_default
_________________ Pentium III/866 Coppermine, 512 MB of RAM, 30 GB hard drive running Puppy Diamond 5.28 and Puppy Wary 5.3.92.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
technosaurus

Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 3845
|
Posted: Fri 05 Feb 2010, 07:23 Post_subject:
|
|
which one did you try and which packages did you install?
_________________ Puppy Web Desktop Now with pet packages - Pet Packaging 100 & 101
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Colonel Panic

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 1235
|
Posted: Fri 05 Feb 2010, 08:23 Post_subject:
|
|
Thanks for replying.
Midori-2.2-92.pet (not the shared one). No additional packages.
_________________ Pentium III/866 Coppermine, 512 MB of RAM, 30 GB hard drive running Puppy Diamond 5.28 and Puppy Wary 5.3.92.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
technosaurus

Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 3845
|
Posted: Fri 05 Feb 2010, 09:41 Post_subject:
|
|
the updated glib is REQUIRED - I had to update it for libsoup to compile - that should fix you up
_________________ Puppy Web Desktop Now with pet packages - Pet Packaging 100 & 101
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
abushcrafter

Joined: 30 Oct 2009 Posts: 1447 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri 05 Feb 2010, 12:01 Post_subject:
|
|
I give up fails, fails and fails .
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Colonel Panic

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 1235
|
Posted: Fri 05 Feb 2010, 15:35 Post_subject:
|
|
| technosaurus wrote: | | the updated glib is REQUIRED - I had to update it for libsoup to compile - that should fix you up |
Thanks, that finally did it. I'm now posting from Midori.
Once again, thank you for a decent browser; even in 4.30, it runs at just 56 processes showing on the Gkrellm meter, which is comparable to what Dillo and Netsurf manage whilst offering fewer facilities.
_________________ Pentium III/866 Coppermine, 512 MB of RAM, 30 GB hard drive running Puppy Diamond 5.28 and Puppy Wary 5.3.92.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
DMcCunney
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 Posts: 894
|
Posted: Fri 05 Feb 2010, 16:19 Post_subject:
|
|
| Colonel Panic wrote: | Thanks, that finally did it. I'm now posting from Midori.
Once again, thank you for a decent browser; even in 4.30, it runs at just 56 processes showing on the Gkrellm meter, which is comparable to what Dillo and Netsurf manage whilst offering fewer facilities. |
Don't take total number of processes as indicative.
Under Xfce4 on 4.31, ps returns a total of 47 processes. Run Midori, and the process total increases by one to 48 - the midori process.
Top is a better indicator of resource consumption, Here, it shows Midori using a 13MB resident memory segment, a 130MB virtual size, about 13% memory usage, and CPU usage varying by what is going on.
The nice thing about Midori is that it uses few resources when loaded but not in use. CPU usage drops to about 1%, for example (though memory requirements are unchanged.
It seems roughly comparable to the static build of Opera 10.10 on my machine. Load time for Midori is about 20 seconds to Opera's 25. Opera has a larger resident size (38MB) but lower virtual size (80MB). Opera uses a larger portion of memory (16.5%), but has roughly similar CPU usage at rest.
I think Opera has an edge in rendering speed, but not a huge one.
______
Dennis
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Colonel Panic

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 1235
|
Posted: Sun 07 Feb 2010, 19:37 Post_subject:
|
|
Thanks for the info Dennis. You're right, my means of judging the resource usage of an app or distro needs a bit of refinement
If you're running 4.20, another library seems to be required - libsqlite-3.3.6.12.so.0.
There is a fix for it in this thread;
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=50694&sid=732d4e829712a8e58144d8808600434c
but then you're back to the "symbol lookup errors" again. I suspect Midori only works well in the latest Pups (4.3+).
_________________ Pentium III/866 Coppermine, 512 MB of RAM, 30 GB hard drive running Puppy Diamond 5.28 and Puppy Wary 5.3.92.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|