Hi
i have created a sail-puppy based on dpup 482 (downloaded dpup-477, but the sfs calls dpup-482.sfs ).
Now i was tryed to remaster this. An iso-file was created with near 500 MB.
But after boot with the new CD was only a "standard"-dpup to see.
Is there known a problem with the remaster-tool by dpup?
I was tryed for 2 times. 1st i used the way the remaster-windows say. 2nd i was copy my root-folder to the /tmp/root, Then i was copy the /etc/xdg to the /tmp/etc
Whats the problem?
dpup remaster
-
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 19:39
- Location: Germany
dpup remaster
Gruß Michael
Acer Aspire 5730ZG, 4GB Ram, 320 GiG HD, 2,0 Ghz Intel DualCore
nvidia Geforce 9300M GS TurboCache, Puppys & Ubuntu. Vista gelöscht!
Acer Aspire 5730ZG, 4GB Ram, 320 GiG HD, 2,0 Ghz Intel DualCore
nvidia Geforce 9300M GS TurboCache, Puppys & Ubuntu. Vista gelöscht!
Helllo, sailorbrand.
You say:
> But after boot with the new CD was only a "standard"-dpup to see.
Could you please give more precisions?
Do you mean that the LOGO screen of your remastered dpup is the same?
Or do you mean that NONE of your new programs or configurations, etc., were integrated in the new iso? Do you mean that the new iso is the same as the original dpup?
Obviously, only the second situation would be a real problem...
Since dpup is evolving very fast, it might not be a good idea to make a remaster of it until it is relatively stable. Only my opinion, of course.
As for me, for dpup beta 4, I used a frugal install with a BIG "dpupsave" file, and for dpup beta 5, I used the "save to DVD" option.
BFN and thanks in advance for your clarifications.
Happy New Year, too!
You say:
> But after boot with the new CD was only a "standard"-dpup to see.
Could you please give more precisions?
Do you mean that the LOGO screen of your remastered dpup is the same?
Or do you mean that NONE of your new programs or configurations, etc., were integrated in the new iso? Do you mean that the new iso is the same as the original dpup?
Obviously, only the second situation would be a real problem...
Since dpup is evolving very fast, it might not be a good idea to make a remaster of it until it is relatively stable. Only my opinion, of course.
As for me, for dpup beta 4, I used a frugal install with a BIG "dpupsave" file, and for dpup beta 5, I used the "save to DVD" option.
BFN and thanks in advance for your clarifications.
Happy New Year, too!
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
-
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 19:39
- Location: Germany
This is what i wont to say.musher0 wrote:Helllo, sailorbrand.
Or do you mean that NONE of your new programs or configurations, etc., were integrated in the new iso? Do you mean that the new iso is the same as the original dpup?
By the other hand: the new iso are more big then the original...
Happy New Year, too!
Gruß Michael
Acer Aspire 5730ZG, 4GB Ram, 320 GiG HD, 2,0 Ghz Intel DualCore
nvidia Geforce 9300M GS TurboCache, Puppys & Ubuntu. Vista gelöscht!
Acer Aspire 5730ZG, 4GB Ram, 320 GiG HD, 2,0 Ghz Intel DualCore
nvidia Geforce 9300M GS TurboCache, Puppys & Ubuntu. Vista gelöscht!
Do the programs in the new iso work?sailorbrand wrote:This is what i wont to say.musher0 wrote:Helllo, sailorbrand.
Or do you mean that NONE of your new programs or configurations, etc., were integrated in the new iso? Do you mean that the new iso is the same as the original dpup?
By the other hand: the new iso are more big then the original...
Happy New Year, too!
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)
-
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 19:39
- Location: Germany