Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Thu 28 Aug 2014, 21:27
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Suggestions
Should we change rox to other more beautiful ones... ?SOLVED
Moderators: Flash, Ian, JohnMurga
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
Page 1 of 7 [95 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
Author Message
Master_wrong

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 456

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 11:00    Post subject:  Should we change rox to other more beautiful ones... ?SOLVED
Subject description: the answer is noooooo....... 3 person voted yes and 16 person voted no
 

I just browsing for filemanager that i stumbled this :

http://pcmanfm.sourceforge.net/

not just beautiful it also small
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=156956&package_id=175349&release_id=613829

even smaller than rox filer
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=7023&package_id=7131

I thought why don't we use pcmanager so we can reduce space and also improve user experience ?

thank you

Last edited by Master_wrong on Tue 02 Jun 2009, 09:46; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bugman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2131
Location: buffalo commons

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 11:55    Post subject:  

i voted 'no', even though i think the pcman looks and sounds good

has it been tested by anyone here?

rox works well, it is a known quantity

also, requirements, does puppy already have these?

* automake >= 1.9
* libgtk2.0-dev >= 2.6
* libglib2.0-dev >= 2.6 (2.10+ is highly recommended)
* libgamin-dev or libfam-dev (libgamin is better)
* libstartup-notification0-dev
* libhal-dev (Required when --enable-hal configure option is used)
* libdbus-1-dev (Required when --enable-hal configure option is used)
* libhal-storage-dev (Required when --enable-hal configure option is used)

if so, good, if not, then that increases the size

i recognize a couple of them, but i'm not good on knowing my libs...

Embarassed

_________________
. . . the machines are clean
and the machines are not corrupted


- lee "scratch" perry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
ttuuxxx


Joined: 05 May 2007
Posts: 10747
Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 12:46    Post subject:  

Rox isn't just a filemanager, its also a pinboard, Rox is a Desktop Environment, Theres only about 15 or so different "Desktop Environment" for linux, like Gnome,kde, etc
here's a link, http://xwinman.org/otherdesktops.php
by far Rox is the lightest for what you get out of it, plus its stable as heck.
ttuuxxx

_________________
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games Smile

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
Master_wrong

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 456

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 13:28    Post subject:  

@bugman
Quote:
i voted 'no', even though i think the pcman looks and sounds good

has it been tested by anyone here?


thank you for the slight positif tone of your "nay !" answer, I hope someone will try these on their puplet then.

@ttuxx
thank for the info, i didn't realize that... but in case we want to use it, could we remove rox filer or could we use other like aewm : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aewm

or ude
http://udeproject.sourceforge.net/index.shtml

I'm looking at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desktop_environment
and i cannot find aewm too
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5721
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 13:32    Post subject:  

I voted no. Rox works and it is light weight.

I see no point in change just for the sake of change.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bugman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2131
Location: buffalo commons

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 14:30    Post subject:  

Master_wrong wrote:
I hope someone will try these on their puplet then.


well, i was sorta hoping you would say that you had tried it, actually...

otherwise, how is anyone to know?

can i expect to see a pet in this thread soon?

_________________
. . . the machines are clean
and the machines are not corrupted


- lee "scratch" perry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
01micko


Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 7794
Location: qld

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 15:45    Post subject:  

Hi there,

ttuuxxx has some good points in his post. We do get plenty of bang for byte out of Rox.

I think MU uses pcmanfm in NYP, but Rox is there. It lokks nice and works well.

Cheers

_________________
Woof Mailing List | keep the faith Cool |
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
Flash
Official Dog Handler


Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 11025
Location: Arizona USA

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 15:47    Post subject:  

It's kind of ridiculous to ask people to vote on something they never heard of before they have a chance to try it out. Confused

Can pcman do batch file rename? That's one of the very useful things Rox does that no other file manager can, at least that I know of. And that includes Windows.

If the only reason you want to change is looks, well, count me out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Dingo


Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 1415
Location: somewhere at the end of rainbow...

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 15:51    Post subject:  

I thing is good keep ROX as filemanager, only, I suggest upgrade ROX to latest release
_________________
replace .co.cc with .info to get access to stuff I posted in forum
dropbox 2GB free
OpenOffice for Puppy Linux
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
battleshooter


Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 1070
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 18:27    Post subject:  

Voted no as well. I use Pcmanager in Unnamed so I have tried it. It's not that pretty. Something different maybe, but I don't see what's wrong with Rox.
_________________
LMMS 1.0.2, Ardour 3.5.389, Kdenlive 0.9.8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
01micko


Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 7794
Location: qld

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 20:14    Post subject:  

I think some people like the 2 pane file managers... tree on the left and working directory on the right.

I wonder, can Rox be configured to do that?

_________________
Woof Mailing List | keep the faith Cool |
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
Master_wrong

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 456

PostPosted: Fri 29 May 2009, 22:30    Post subject:  

Quote:

I think MU uses pcmanfm in NYP, but Rox is there. It lokks nice and works well.


i think this is the pcmanfm ?
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?search_id=1527791096&t=25699

is this puplet has pcmanager ?
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=39154

thank you
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
ecomoney


Joined: 25 Nov 2005
Posts: 2183
Location: Lincolnshire, England

PostPosted: Sat 30 May 2009, 06:39    Post subject:  

Rox works well and is lightweight, but is not particulaly "friendly to linux newbies" as it lack a hierarchical "tree view" style navigation. This makes it very difficult for new users coming over from windows to discover the linux filesystem layout. Rox as a desktop environment, with XFE or FileMaker as a file manager would be a much more suitable for Puppies target audience.
_________________
Puppy Linux's Mission

Sorry, my server is down atm!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger 
bugman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2131
Location: buffalo commons

PostPosted: Sat 30 May 2009, 07:19    Post subject:  

ecomoney wrote:
Rox works well and is lightweight, but is not particulaly "friendly to linux newbies" as it lack a hierarchical "tree view" style navigation. This makes it very difficult for new users coming over from windows to discover the linux filesystem layout. Rox as a desktop environment, with XFE or FileMaker as a file manager would be a much more suitable for Puppies target audience.


yet somehow, i and so many other 'newbies' figured it out

[weary of the patronizing]

_________________
. . . the machines are clean
and the machines are not corrupted


- lee "scratch" perry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
Master_wrong

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 456

PostPosted: Sat 30 May 2009, 07:46    Post subject:  

or can we have these 3D desktop into puppy ?
bumptop

http://bumptop.com/features.php

Laughing
interesting but looks complicated
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 7 [95 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Suggestions
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0896s ][ Queries: 12 (0.0080s) ][ GZIP on ]