It can't be an insult if it's accurate.davesurrey wrote:WhoDo wrote:Thanks for the insult, WhoDo. But I doubt it stands you in good light.Not while supercilious people like you continue to twist the facts to suit themselves.
Spin, spin, spin. Is it "morally correct" to use the cover of PRIVATE means to employ intimidatory tactics? You be the judge; you seem to relish the role!davesurrey wrote:I am well aware of that but think you have highlighted the wrong word. I believe it should be PRIVATE and you are splitting hairs here over what is an important issue of privacy. Trying to twist facts...no, of course not.1. We were talking about a Private Message on a forum not private electronic MAIL, for which you kindly provided a suitable definition.
And you ignored any question as to whether it was morally correct.
And you seem to have ignored the syntax in my original comment. I did NOT accuse ecomoney of terrorism but of using terrorist tactics, of which intimidation is one by your own definition. Spin, spin, spin. Aren't you getting dizzy yet?davesurrey wrote:Thanks for the history lessons but I think you will find I also received an education as well as you.2. Intimidation (your definition) comes in many forms, one of those being the repeated use of small, seemingly insignificant attacks to induce a fear of the next attack - terrorist tactics IOW. It was first made popular in guerrilla warfare, but turned into an art form by modern terrorist groups.
However you seem to have missed the important point that there was a great big AND in that definition. You can't just ignore that the definition involves violence, which makes it patently absurd to use in such a thread.
Thanks. It's about time one you arrogant twats let someone else have the last word! Let's see if the tag team follows your lead! BTW, the "last word" is that this whole issue was started by ecomoney refusing to accept that NO means NO!davesurrey wrote:I'll ignore the further insults and xenophobia towards the UK. Thanks for your welcome to the debate, but I have no wish to play to your game.Welcome to the debate, Spin Doctor #2. Must be a free "master class" in the subject available somewhere in the UK.
I've said what I believed was needed saying; if you don't agree so be it.
I don't see any need to discuss this further as you seem so stuck in your beliefs and it won't do Puppy any good continuing this, as it didn't starting this in the first place, as you did.
So over to you WhoDo, have the last word, insult, whatever.....
Dave
(deluded of the UK)