Serious security breach on Developer Blog

News, happenings
Message
Author
User avatar
prehistoric
Posts: 1744
Joined: Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:34

New attack?

#76 Post by prehistoric »

Just found a Puppy-related site displaying a login for LoLoLa, (don't have the accents right,) which a Google search seems to show as a singles' site. If anyone finds others out there, get the time of the attack as closely as possible, so we can trace propagation. I've notified the operator by gmail, while checking other sites.

prehistoric

edit: Now identified this as a Trojan, with name LoLoLo. Above name was mistake due to appearance.

ymer
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri 18 May 2007, 22:20

#77 Post by ymer »

If that's a Trojan, then www . ttuuxx . com is hacked also, the same LoLoLo stuff is displayed at its front page.
Last edited by ymer on Fri 18 Jan 2008, 21:01, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
prehistoric
Posts: 1744
Joined: Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:34

Linked to Trojan?

#78 Post by prehistoric »

@ymer,

Didn't you stop to think why I failed to provide a link to a Trojan?

Are you under the control of dark powers?

prehistoric

Caneri
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue 04 Sep 2007, 13:23
Location: Canada

#79 Post by Caneri »

Thanks for the info.

eric
[color=darkred][i]Be not afraid to grow slowly, only be afraid of standing still.[/i]
Chinese Proverb[/color]

User avatar
RobertB
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue 03 Jan 2006, 01:06
Location: Big D
Contact:

#80 Post by RobertB »

I don't know if this is helpful to the problem, but I noticed in the TouTou Puppy thread ( http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=24074 ) that there's a posting by "John Smith" that is an exact copy of the (French!) posting above it. It's the only posting by that user.

*EDIT* The duplicate posting features a link to a laser pointer sales site in the .sig. Also, when they cut-n-pasted the text, they turned "Cordialement ;)" into "Cordialement Wink"...

User avatar
Flash
Official Dog Handler
Posts: 13071
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 16:04
Location: Arizona USA

#81 Post by Flash »

If you mean this post, I'll remove it if the consensus is that it is spam. (And remove the poster from the membership list too.)

User avatar
prehistoric
Posts: 1744
Joined: Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:34

spoor of the beast

#82 Post by prehistoric »

Things are slow here. Been off elsewhere, tracking. "bear" may have left a calling card on the computation freebies board some little time ago.
(WARNING: use any links with shields up! "pfix=ram", etc.)
http://freeforums.bizhat.com/index.php? ... #entry1164
Doesn't anyone ever clean up that site?

How does the date and content compare with BarryK's problems? Has anyone seen an earlier example of this particular genre?

prehistoric

ymer
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri 18 May 2007, 22:20

#83 Post by ymer »

Didn't you stop to think why I failed to provide a link to a Trojan?
Sorry, it wasn't intentional. Removed it.

User avatar
prehistoric
Posts: 1744
Joined: Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:34

Re: linked Trojan

#84 Post by prehistoric »

@ymer,

Sorry, I was upset because I had had no response from all my attempts to contact ttuuxxx and the Trojan was still up. There was a typo which prevented the clueless from simply clicking through, so it did no real harm. Caneri saw it and realised he needed to disable some links, which was good.

@anyone,

I've now figured out how to handle warnings in that particular case. We need a better way in general to notify site administration when a hacked site is discovered. Suggestions?

prehistoric

maddox
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri 28 Sep 2007, 20:37
Location: sometimes in France

#85 Post by maddox »

might sound dumb, what about pseudo user accounts for this
use their trick

Sage
Posts: 5536
Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2005, 08:34
Location: GB

#86 Post by Sage »

I've been urging John to complete his appointment of additional savvy moderators, preferably distributed evenly across the globe. Originally, this I envisaged would better deal with the persistent spammers who remained visible until sun up in Arizona, but now the need becomes much more urgent.

User avatar
prehistoric
Posts: 1744
Joined: Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:34

community vs. attackers

#87 Post by prehistoric »

Here's a quote from a PM I sent while worrying about the issues of openess and secrecy in relation to our current problem.
Not wanting to say too much to the wrong people. That's the maddening thing about this whole business. Our whole model for problem solving is built on openess and cooperation. The damage attacks cause goes beyond the stuff you could take to court as evidence of monetary loss.

This episode has taught me one lesson; you shouldn't try to consider a software system in isolation from people. When you start trying to build programs that can stand on their own against a real, potentially-hostile human world you are into AI, where huge systems that consume all the resources you have and are never finished, or debugged, are all too common. The Puppy user/developer community is an integral part of Puppy.

If you want a case study in how not to organize the developer/user community read Daniel Robbins on the two cultures he found when he tried to return to Gentoo.
http://blog.funtoo.org/2008/01/tale-of- ... tures.html

Most people in the software business still don't really believe it possible to create and maintain an operating system of any significance with volunteers. They've all seen how large teams of highly-paid people can fail to accomplish a fraction of the innovation found here. (This might have some connection with the idea that if the software is finished, and can stand on its own, there's no more need for developers.) I've seen several times how they keep looking for the trick, the exception which will allow them to classify Puppy as unreal.
Does that spark any thoughts about preserving the community as well as computer systems?

prehistoric

Edit: link fixed, and tested. This takes you to specific page. thanks to paulh177
Last edited by prehistoric on Sat 19 Jan 2008, 15:11, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
paulh177
Posts: 975
Joined: Tue 22 Aug 2006, 20:41

#88 Post by paulh177 »

that blog is worth a read, but is at http://blog.funtoo.org/ (the link from primitive's PM is broken for me)

User avatar
JohnMurga
Site Admin
Posts: 555
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 04:26
Location: Far to the east
Contact:

#89 Post by JohnMurga »

Hi,

I have received a lot of e-mails and private messages on this subject, and I am monitoring the situation and this thread. I have regular backups, and the whole server - and forum software will be upgraded some time at the end of Jan, when hopefully I'll have some time to go through the moderator situation too.

Either way I'd like to thank Flash publicly for taking care of everything moderation related so well for us :-)

Cheers
JohnM

kattami
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri 18 Jan 2008, 02:16
Location: Norway

#90 Post by kattami »

Maybe its an idea to use the wiki at www.tiddlywiki.com that stores everything in one single html file? There is also a kubrick theme that is similar to the wordpress theme for tiddlywiki here:

http://tiddlythemes.com/empties/Kubrick.html

I would think that there would be no need for servers with stuff installed, like php scripts, to have a blog online if using tiddlywiki. And if writing offline and then upload to website it will be quick to delete everything on a website if something gets compromised and insert fresh copy from the one offline.

But minus with tiddlywiki is that per today its only firefox and IE that saves changes to tiddlywiki with no problems, and that some say it gets slow when its big. Opera has a problem with saving to the file and need some extra jar file which may not work. I dont know if Seamonkey is able to save to tiddlywiki.

As for security breaches and hacking attacks, its a good question who may be behind them. Some think that even governmental elements would like to get rid of things that is focused on freedom and cooperation and sharing. After all, the internet grew to be the peoples net and not something that could be controlled. I know someone in China so I hear very often about how they are blocked from websites and such. Thats the government whos doing this.

PS: As a matter of fact I told this person about puppylinux and a few days later I heard that all sites on puppylinux is blocked in China where they are (dont know how it is with other cities there). Really strange to hear...

User avatar
prehistoric
Posts: 1744
Joined: Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:34

forces of darkness

#91 Post by prehistoric »

@kattami,

Have strong evidence this is unlikely to be big forces of darkness.

Is "bear" a prince of insufficient light? :P

prehistoric

raffy
Posts: 4798
Joined: Wed 25 May 2005, 12:20
Location: Manila

blocked

#92 Post by raffy »

all sites on puppylinux is blocked in China
From what I know, it's servage.net that is blocked. And it happened that both puppylinux.org and puppylinux.com are now hosted in servage.

However, there are many other mirror and repository sites:
http://puppyisos.org/
http://puppylinux.ca/
http://s3.amazonaws.com/puppy/index.html
http://mymirrors.homelinux.org/puppy/
(the few that I can recall now, that is).

I hope that distrowatch.com and ibiblio.org are not banned in China.
Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? [url=http://puppylinux.info/topic/freeoffice-2012-sfs]Get the sfs (English only)[/url].

User avatar
prehistoric
Posts: 1744
Joined: Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:34

Psychology of Security

#93 Post by prehistoric »

Here's some thought-provoking material from Bruce Scheier.
http://www.schneier.com/essay-155.html

Here's a description of Schneier himself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Schneier

I first knew about him because of his work in cryptography, back when I was more mathematical than today. His Applied Cryptography is a classic.
When he went into Computer Security as a professional, he had a series of shocks. This formed the basis of his book Secrets and Lies.

The classic example from that book, for me, is the teenage hacker he interviewed. How did he break in?
"I called them up and told them I forgot my password."

His book, Beyond Fear is particularly relevant to this discussion, but I have not read it, yet.

Added: For those who think the psychology is off topic, I offer an alternative viewpoint particularly relevant for people who value minimalism in software, as Puppy people do.
http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_ ... index.html

Hope this will shift our thinking in a productive direction.

prehistoric

p.s. Thanks to Flash for straightening me out on the book links. I've also changed them so they take you directly to the author's web pages, instead of Amazon. As my career started before HTML existed, or had anything to link to, I am still learning.
Last edited by prehistoric on Sun 20 Jan 2008, 21:11, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
BarryK
Puppy Master
Posts: 9392
Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 09:23
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

#94 Post by BarryK »

My site is violated again. The main page of puppylinux.com, but that's probably the tip of the iceberg.
I have to get stuck into cleaning it up.
[url]https://bkhome.org/news/[/url]

ymer
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri 18 May 2007, 22:20

#95 Post by ymer »

A very dumb question or maybe suggestion:

The story is that I've always fears of puppy running only with a root account, a simple compromise would allow the intruder to take control of everything, which you know what could be done by that.

Also, I think it would be great to have a notification system integrated into puppy: for example if some serious security patches comes up or ... shouldn't we get notified by some applications rather than waiting for us or the user to visit the forums, news, ... sections to find out that we had to update something.

I know that Linux in general is more secure (or at least more securable) than M$, but I think those days of Linux hacking are coming and with this trend we might get caught with our pants down.

Sorry for a rather long post.

PS: I know these kind of topics for sure have been discussed before, but by rising of these kind of treats, shouldn't we put these into the priority of puppy Linux.

Post Reply