The time now is Tue 18 Jun 2013, 21:25
All times are UTC - 4 |
|
Page 1 of 3 Posts_count |
Goto page: 1, 2, 3 Next |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
Guest
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 02:29 Post_subject:
How to hide the booting process? |
|
I want to ask that how to skip or hide the loading process while booting into puppy.
thanks!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Bruce B

Joined: 18 May 2005 Posts: 10823 Location: The Peoples Republic of California
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 02:39 Post_subject:
Re: how to hide the booting process |
|
| Anonymous wrote: | I want to ask that how to skip or hide the loading process while booting into puppy.
thanks! |
More info needed if you please:
How are you booting Puppy? For example, with cd disc, with grub on floppy, with tiny.exe, with lilo, with grub on mbr, etc.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Guest
Guest
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 03:05 Post_subject:
|
|
thank you for your mention
I use IDE adapter with CF card boot from IDE, I brun a CD that is include version 1.0.3 and follow the CD's instruction to do that.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Bruce B

Joined: 18 May 2005 Posts: 10823 Location: The Peoples Republic of California
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 03:30 Post_subject:
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | thank you for your mention
I use IDE adapter with CF card boot from IDE, I brun a CD that is include version 1.0.3 and follow the CD's instruction to do that. |
I'm trying to figure out brun is a typo, is so, does it mean 'burn' or 'run'. I'll go with 'run'.
If this is the case, not much you can do.
There are methods of creating your own custom CD and many Puppy users do so. This seems to me to be the most viable option, perhaps the only one.
Maybe other users have better suggestions, because I wasn't much help.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Guest
Guest
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 03:42 Post_subject:
|
|
Turn off your monitor and wait 5 minutes until puppy has fully booted to hide the boot process.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rarsa

Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 3053 Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 10:40 Post_subject:
|
|
Don't be so mean blade.
I was going to recommend the same but only wait 2 minutes.
Although I've never booted from a CF card, maybe 5 minutes is accurate. My live CD takes 1 minute, my HDD installation takes 30 seconds.
An alternative is to turn on the computer and go prepare a sandwich and milk (Or hard liquor for some people). That will serve two purposes. You won't see the puppy boot instructions and you will have a more pleasant puppy experience.
You see... Linux is about choices, you can choose not to look at the screen.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
babbs

Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 397 Location: Running down a highway in Virginia, USA.
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 12:52 Post_subject:
|
|
I'd like to ask the question too... Is there any way to hide the boot-up lines that flash up the screen? I can't read things going by that fast, why show them? Would the boot-up speed get any faster if the system was not worrying about displaying the progress? I know there isn't much that can be done about how long the OS takes to load into RAM, likewise about loading /home from a USB device, but are there any speed benefits by not printing the commands/results to the display? I actually think that this question can be looked at for reasons other than cosmetics. I do think that this data should be visable during the first boot (or during testing) in case there is a problem and the progress/error is shown, but if it works, why keep showing it if you don't have to?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rarsa

Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 3053 Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 12:55 Post_subject:
|
|
| Quote: | | but are there any speed benefits by not printing the commands/results to the display? |
Not showing it would be more expensive.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Pizzasgood

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 6270 Location: Knoxville, TN, USA
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 14:44 Post_subject:
|
|
Well, you could go into /etc/rc.d and go through the scripts there and just comment/delete any lines that say echo. That would get rid of much of it, and wouldn't insrease strain at all.
_________________ Between depriving a man of one hour from his life and depriving him of his life there exists only a difference of degree. --Muad'Dib

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
babbs

Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 397 Location: Running down a highway in Virginia, USA.
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 15:09 Post_subject:
|
|
rarsa - If you say so, I'll take your word for it since I don't know one way or the other and I believe you know what you are talking about.
Pizzasgood - Interesting concept. Any idea how many lines that would be? Also, is this something we would really want to recommend to new Puppy users?
Since it doesn't appear that boot speed can be affected in this mannor... If commenting out lines in the rc.d would reduce the number of lines of code displayed during the boot process, maybe a simple boolean test of "is there a pup00x file?" If yes, and if the last shut down was clean, use the commented out rc.d; otherwise, use the normal rc.d file. Just rambling on here... I don't know what the answer is, could be, or should be... I'm just so glad that Puppy works!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Guest
Guest
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 19:37 Post_subject:
|
|
You wont get rid of the kernel messages without patching the kernel......But why do ppl get so hung up about boot messages ?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rarsa

Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 3053 Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 20:40 Post_subject:
|
|
Beats me. But don't take it personal Bladehunter, it's not you, it's them.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Pizzasgood

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 6270 Location: Knoxville, TN, USA
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 21:45 Post_subject:
|
|
From what I can tell, they seem to think displaying text as it starts is either "primitive" or "scary." I think text is cool, but I don't count because I'm weird. It's all the fault of WindowsXP. Everyone just assumes that if it is how Gates does it, it must be right. I think Gates is getting senile, but that's just me.
I have no idea how many lines that would be, but I guess you could write a script to find and remove them if you were ambitious enough. It shouldn't be too hard for a beginner. Look through a file, see echo, add a # to the beginning of the line. Procede to the next file. Reboot to have only limited text messages, and a dumbed down puppy
_________________ Between depriving a man of one hour from his life and depriving him of his life there exists only a difference of degree. --Muad'Dib

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Flash
Official Dog Handler

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 9906 Location: Arizona USA
|
Posted: Fri 16 Sep 2005, 23:54 Post_subject:
|
|
| babbs wrote: | | ...I can't read things going by that fast, why show them? |
My complaint exactly!
| babbs wrote: | | ...I actually think that this question can be looked at for reasons other than cosmetics. I do think that this data should be visible during the first boot (or during testing) in case there is a problem and the progress/error is shown, but if it works, why keep showing it if you don't have to? |
I agree. It would be nice if the boot screen had some practical use. For example, for troubleshooting purposes it would be great if one could step through the boot process. That is, the computer would wait after running each step of the boot process until the "Enter" key is hit to run the next step. Once that option exists, perhaps it wouldn't be too hard to add a checkbox that says "Do not show boot messages."
Bladehunter, how hard would it be to add the ability to single-step through the boot process?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rarsa

Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 3053 Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Sat 17 Sep 2005, 00:38 Post_subject:
|
|
| Quote: | | My complaint exactly! | Why complain? If it is just a few seconds, how does that affect your user experience.
I try to look at it from different angles and I really cannot see how text showing fast can affect someone.
If you don't want to read it, don't read it. If you cannot read it, don't try to read it.
I agree with bladehunter. There are many other more important things that need attention in Puppy.
Actually, I'm giving up, the effort given to these posts, can be better used in other tasks.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 3 Posts_count |
Goto page: 1, 2, 3 Next |
|
|
Rules_post_cannot Rules_reply_cannot Rules_edit_cannot Rules_delete_cannot Rules_vote_cannot You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|