| Author |
Message |
mysticmarks

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 157 Location: California
|
Posted: Sun 15 Apr 2007, 11:50 Post subject:
Brand New Open Office 2.2 sfs! Subject description: Full sfs with all xdg menu entries |
|
This is a total build of the complete 2.2 Open Office directly from their source tarball. It is The complete suite and will load int the same location as the Original OOo_215.sfs and this one contains menu entries for everything. I found that everything loads much faster than the original OOo_215.sfs.
Please respond to MU's post here-->http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=17331&search_id=76077873
I really would like to make sure no one else has to worry about the issue of creating entries like in the other sfs for Open Office 2.2 as that was the motivation for spending 6 hours creating this file.
Here is the download link that can also be found on MU's post as well.-->http://puppyisos.org/files/sfs/OpenOffice-2.2-mysticmarks/
Don't forget to:
#1. move/save the sfs file to /mnt/home
#2. reboot
#3. open console/terminal and type ---> fixmenus
#4. restart the window manager icewm
Enjoy! (and remember to relate your experience after install to MU!)
Last edited by mysticmarks on Mon 23 Apr 2007, 03:43; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
cb88

Joined: 28 Jan 2007 Posts: 1160 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon 16 Apr 2007, 09:07 Post subject:
|
|
question: how fast are you talkin'? fast on a pc with 128Mb and a 1 ghz proc or fast on a 64Mb pc with 300 Mhz proc? the OOo_2.15.sfs will run on such a machine but it is reallllllllly ssssssslllllllllllllllllloooooooowww........!!!!!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Matu
Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 48 Location: Europe, Hungary
|
Posted: Mon 16 Apr 2007, 10:30 Post subject:
|
|
First of all, let me say thank you for your work. I don't care about the speed of the program, but we have the possibility to use it.
Thanks again,
Matu
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mysticmarks

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 157 Location: California
|
Posted: Mon 16 Apr 2007, 10:37 Post subject:
relative speed Subject description: relative speed |
|
My slowest test machine has 256MB of ram, and a 2ghz processor. So this isnt going to be a great point of reference for you. However, my personal load times for the majority of open office apps went from around 5 seconds down to around 2 seconds. So that, for me, was quite an improvement.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mysticmarks

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 157 Location: California
|
Posted: Mon 16 Apr 2007, 10:42 Post subject:
thanks Subject description: thanks |
|
| Matu wrote: | First of all, let me say thank you for your work. I don't care about the speed of the program, but we have the possibility to use it.
Thanks again,
Matu |
No problem. Thanks for the little note of appreciation.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
cb88

Joined: 28 Jan 2007 Posts: 1160 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon 16 Apr 2007, 16:35 Post subject:
|
|
I think it took about a minute and a half so based on what you day the load time could be as fast as 30-45 sec on the old machine that would be a real improvement. you could test it in qemu puppy limit the virtual ram to 64 Mb and lower the cycles in the config file (I think that can be done) it's usefull for testing which parts of an app are slowing it down (like slowmo cameras for atheletes).
cb88
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mysticmarks

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 157 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue 17 Apr 2007, 17:49 Post subject:
testing Subject description: testing |
|
| cb88 wrote: | I think it took about a minute and a half so based on what you day the load time could be as fast as 30-45 sec on the old machine that would be a real improvement. you could test it in qemu puppy limit the virtual ram to 64 Mb and lower the cycles in the config file (I think that can be done) it's usefull for testing which parts of an app are slowing it down (like slowmo cameras for atheletes).
cb88 |
Go for it!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jstrake
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 1 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu 19 Apr 2007, 10:46 Post subject:
a possible mirror for this download? |
|
Hi. Sounds great, but looks like the current site is over bandwidth. Is there a possibility of getting a mirror of this download up? Thanks. Hoping to try it out.
Jonathan
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
amish
Joined: 24 Sep 2006 Posts: 616
|
Posted: Thu 19 Apr 2007, 12:15 Post subject:
|
|
that's right folks! bloat is f***in' expensive!
[size=1000]bloat:[/size] the other, other, other, other white meat...
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
MU

Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 13642 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
|
Posted: Thu 19 Apr 2007, 16:56 Post subject:
|
|
the site is back in 2 hours.
But expect bandwidth problems again, so try to download early when it is back.
Mark
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
cb88

Joined: 28 Jan 2007 Posts: 1160 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri 20 Apr 2007, 08:10 Post subject:
|
|
Tested on the 64Mb 300 Mhz laptop still really slow but it seem a little more resonsive might even work if i had another 32 Mb ram. great work!
I think it still took around 120-140 sec to load did i mention the HD is really slow sounds like there is a giant beetle in my hard drive .
cb88
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mysticmarks

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 157 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri 20 Apr 2007, 11:22 Post subject:
cool Subject description: cool |
|
Cool, glad it loaded up for you. Ive finished my latest SFS file. This one will be uploaded today hopefully. It is going to contain JAVA, Flash, Azureus, and Frostwire. this is more of a file sharing geared sfs, where webmini_215.sfs was for browsing and lighter editing of web stuff. Im doing one last run through on the dev sites for the peer products to make sure there is no updates before i upload. Heads up for later on!
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
raffy
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4636 Location: Manila
|
Posted: Fri 20 Apr 2007, 21:07 Post subject:
try filefactory |
|
Would you like to try this for alternate download site, as mysticmarks' creations are becoming very popular.
_________________ Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? Get the sfs (English only).
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mysticmarks

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 157 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat 21 Apr 2007, 01:39 Post subject:
post away Subject description: post away |
|
all mirrors are a great addition.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
davec51
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 474 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Sat 21 Apr 2007, 10:48 Post subject:
My OO 2.2 is Invisible |
|
Surely I am doing something bizarre, but I hope I can achieve fulfillment on this forum, as usual.
I downloaded and installed the 2.2 PupGet. Menu items were added to the Documents menu. But when I click on any of the items in the submenu, absolutely nothing happens. The .sfs is in my hard-disk root, along with all the other Puppy stuff.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|