Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Sat 01 Nov 2014, 01:25
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Cutting edge
KDE version of Puppy
Moderators: Flash, Ian, JohnMurga
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
Page 2 of 4 [48 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Author Message
klhrevolutionist


Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1124

PostPosted: Mon 08 Aug 2005, 22:28    Post subject: yes  

It seems as though barry is taking this bull(KDE) by the horns and doing what he wants with it! I like the fact your trying to get rid of all the junk kde comes with, I think that fvwm will run fine with kde apps as like you were saying
get rid of the bloat!!! Good work barry and hope you got it figured out

p.s. "klh clears throat" I'll test drive it if you want!!!

_________________
Heaven is on the way, until then let's get the truth out!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Alienx


Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 141
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

PostPosted: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 07:36    Post subject:  

How about this ?

http://www.simplekde.org/

_________________
Sorry, broken english above Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Walt H


Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 216
Location: citizen of the world

PostPosted: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 17:26    Post subject:  

Alienx wrote:
How about this ?

http://www.simplekde.org/


While it seems a worthwhile project, the downloads (three in all, presumably all required) run to about 50 meg, or roughly 80-percent the size of the current Puppy. Maybe a St. Bernard Puppy version? Smile

_________________
Walt

Now that you point it out to me, the answer seems painfully obvious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
ICQ Number 
marquitico

Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 25
Location: New York, NY

PostPosted: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 02:19    Post subject: To KDE or not to KDE...  

Just thought that I'd add a noob's perspective. Never having used LINUX before, the fact that Puppy worked perfectly right out of the box (or perhaps I ought to say, right off the modem) was breathtaking. A nervous puppy became an enthusiastic and crusading puppy, and burned ten copies of the CD-image file for ten of his friends. The results were these:

Two couldn't have been bothered.

Of the remaining eight, two went right out to Wal-Mart and bought boxes with some distro already preloaded (LinSpire, I think).

Of the remaining six, two are so pleased, they are downloading PupGet packages and DotPUPs, as happy as children.

The final four said, it's beautiful, but does it come with KDE? It's the desktop I've seen most often.

Conclusion: the more options available, the more converts, I'd say. Remember that Windows refugees are used to much bloatedness.

Mark
"marquitico"

Puppy 1.0.4 Chubby with OO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
klhrevolutionist


Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1124

PostPosted: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 19:01    Post subject: understand  

So, if I understand you right barry, you could'nt tame konqueror??
Well, it happens. Maybe you could give it to someone who would host it
anyways for others wanting to mess with it???

So, seeing as krazy puppy was a crazy idea, what if anything are you going to integrate from this experience into the next release of puppy???

_________________
Heaven is on the way, until then let's get the truth out!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
mclien

Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 62
Location: germany

PostPosted: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 09:19    Post subject:  

ok, so far I use KDE on faster computer. But not for having KDE itself, but for some interesting applications.
These are:
1.konqueror (but perhaps there are much file browsers out there, that have the same features, with less overloading Qts or so)
Maybe endeavour is worth a shot, because wou have an Image AND filebrowser then.
2.KOrganizer, a calandar and task manager
....well, the rest of kde can be replaced by other (better) apps for me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
MU


Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 13642
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany

PostPosted: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 09:31    Post subject:  

Hi,

do you know XfileExplorer http://www.murga.org/%7Epuppy/viewtopic.php?t=1922
and Monthcalendar http://www.murga.org/%7Epuppy/viewtopic.php?t=2026 ?

Not really comparable to the KDE-Programs, for example XFE does not support Ftp or other nice features.

But for me it is ok as alternative, I use Gftp for Ftp .

Greets, Mark
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
mclien

Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 62
Location: germany

PostPosted: Wed 28 Sep 2005, 11:01    Post subject:  

hi MU,

that lokks good for me. I think I get the dotpups within this weekend to give them e testrun.

My calendar file should work in diffrent enviornments/ OS without distroying something...

I'll try this out and post the results.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
MU


Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 13642
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany

PostPosted: Wed 28 Sep 2005, 12:37    Post subject:  

The calendar-files can be copied from Linux to windows without problems.

The Calendar works with Linux, XP and Win98.

Mark
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
mclien

Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 62
Location: germany

PostPosted: Thu 20 Oct 2005, 08:05    Post subject:  

@MU no time to tset calendar so far.

according to a post above from myself: filemanager endeavour:

http://www.murga.org/~puppy/viewtopic.php?t=2706&highlight=endeavour
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Guest
Guest


PostPosted: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 18:43    Post subject:  

kde_complete-3.4.2.tar.gz decompressed is 0 bytes ?
Back to top
Alienx


Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 141
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

PostPosted: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 21:08    Post subject:  

Anonymous wrote:
kde_complete-3.4.2.tar.gz decompressed is 0 bytes ?


Barry, please, we want to download it Wink

_________________
Sorry, broken english above Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bombay_rockers
Guest


PostPosted: Sat 29 Oct 2005, 14:22    Post subject: kde for puppy  

ok i have got kde running in puppy. earlier i had tried to install kde in puppy but i had failed to get multimedia running.

this time around i have used slax .mo modules and got kde running in puppy

my installation consists of
puppy 1.0.5
a fresh pup file ~400 Mb
kde base
kde libs
arts
xorg server(from slax - arts does not work with the xorg.pup made by MU)
kde games (no sound ??)
kde multimedia (juk, kplayer, mplayer, kscd.. are all working - i have been using this as my default desktop for a week now)
kde network apps
kde pim

k3b is running but i have not been able to test it as i dont have a cd rw drive

the size of my complete installation is ~270 mb
making dotpups of these is out of question for now & i am still testing this.
if you want to help in the testing process i can write for you exact instructions on how to get slax .mo modules to working kde in puppy
Back to top
bombayrockers


Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 427
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 05:17    Post subject: have a look at kde puppy  

this is a screenshot of kde running on my desktop
kde.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   192.09 KB
 Viewed   1129 Time(s)

kde.jpg

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger 
saintlangton

Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 108

PostPosted: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 16:38    Post subject:  

Well done sir!

How long would it take to do this from scratch with your instructions? Are we talking an hour? An evening? A weekend?

From the sound of most of this thread It sounds like it may have been a bit of a long hard jobs.

The use of slax modules sounds like a strike of inspiration. Does this mean slax modules in general are now available for porting to puppy? That would be cool. Or was a case of considerable surgery on those unsuspecting lumps of code?

Again, Congratulations!

Chris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 4 [48 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Cutting edge
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0876s ][ Queries: 12 (0.0182s) ][ GZIP on ]