Firefox 32bit Extended Support Release - discontinued

Browsers, email, chat, etc.
Post Reply
Message
Author
ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

Firefox 32bit Extended Support Release - discontinued

#1 Post by ozsouth »

UPDATE 01 May 2020:

I have decided to in future, only do MAJOR POINT releases (i.e. 68.6.0 , 68.7.0 etc)
as MINOR POINT releases (i.e. 68.6.1 , 68.6.2 etc) can be done by
simply accepting Firefox's offer of update, when that is made.
.
Last edited by ozsouth on Fri 10 Jul 2020, 02:40, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
Moose On The Loose
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2011, 14:54

Re: Firefox 32bit ESR

#2 Post by Moose On The Loose »

ozsouth wrote:Firefox ESR 32bit Version 68.5.0 - tested OK in bionicpup32-8.0 (ScPup 32bit needs gtk3 also). Use at own risk.

Is here: https://www.sendspace.com/file/ffd73e
It downloaded OK but the site threw a 503 error and some other messages along the way.

I will test it later.

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

#3 Post by ozsouth »

@Moose - still issues with former host, so changed to filepup.net - see link in first post.

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

#4 Post by ozsouth »

Firefox ESR 32bit Version 68.6.0 - SUPERSEDED - see below
Last edited by ozsouth on Sat 04 Apr 2020, 00:14, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Flash
Official Dog Handler
Posts: 13071
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 16:04
Location: Arizona USA

#5 Post by Flash »

What is ESR?

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

#6 Post by ozsouth »

@Flash - Firefox Extended Support Release is the 'fewer frills' more stable version aimed at large companies. I find it has most useful features of standard firefox with fewer issues.

s243a
Posts: 2580
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2014, 04:48
Contact:

#7 Post by s243a »

ozsouth wrote:@Flash - Firefox Extended Support Release is the 'fewer frills' more stable version aimed at large companies. I find it has most useful features of standard firefox with fewer issues.
Doesn't the ESR version of firefox also support an older plugin model that the newer Firefox quantum no longer supports?
Find me on [url=https://www.minds.com/ns_tidder]minds[/url] and on [url=https://www.pearltrees.com/s243a/puppy-linux/id12399810]pearltrees[/url].

User avatar
6502coder
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon 23 Mar 2009, 18:07
Location: Western United States

#8 Post by 6502coder »

s243a wrote:Doesn't the ESR version of firefox also support an older plugin model that the newer Firefox quantum no longer supports?
That was briefly true, but not anymore I think. Since September 2018, the ESR version has been based on Firefox 60.2 or later, and all Firefoxes since 57 (the first Quantum) use the new WebExtensions API.

s243a
Posts: 2580
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2014, 04:48
Contact:

#9 Post by s243a »

6502coder wrote:
s243a wrote:Doesn't the ESR version of firefox also support an older plugin model that the newer Firefox quantum no longer supports?
That was briefly true, but not anymore I think. Since September 2018, the ESR version has been based on Firefox 60.2 or later, and all Firefoxes since 57 (the first Quantum) use the new WebExtensions API.
Are you sure? I downloaded via the ppm, firefox-72.0.1 for arch32pup (which I think is the ESR version even though it doesn't say so). It comes with this lib:

Code: Select all

/usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
which was part of the xulrunner project (see post).

Here's what wikipedia says about xulrunner:
Software architecture
XULRunner is a runtime that can be used to bootstrap multiple XUL + XPCOM applications that are equal in capabilities to Firefox and Thunderbird.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XULRunner
The most prominent usage of XPCOM is within the Firefox web browser. Many of its internal components interact via XPCOM interfaces. Furthermore, Firefox used to allow add-ons extensive XPCOM access, but this was removed in Firefox 57 and replaced with the less-permissive WebExtensions API.[2][3] (Three forks of Firefox still support the legacy add-on capability: Pale Moon,[4] Basilisk,[5] Waterfox.[6])
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XPCOM
Find me on [url=https://www.minds.com/ns_tidder]minds[/url] and on [url=https://www.pearltrees.com/s243a/puppy-linux/id12399810]pearltrees[/url].

User avatar
6502coder
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon 23 Mar 2009, 18:07
Location: Western United States

#10 Post by 6502coder »

No, I'm not sure--that's why I hedged and said "I think" ;)

I do know that several months ago I tried running the then-current Firefox ESR but gave it up because it wouldn't take my favorite legacy plug-ins. This being the expected result, I didn't look into the issue in any depth.

These days I don't run any kind of Firefox on Puppy any more because it's just too heavy for my old hardware. I run PaleMoon instead. On my newer computers I do run Firefox as my preferred browser.

s243a
Posts: 2580
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2014, 04:48
Contact:

#11 Post by s243a »

6502coder wrote:No, I'm not sure--that's why I hedged and said "I think" ;)

I do know that several months ago I tried running the then-current Firefox ESR but gave it up because it wouldn't take my favorite legacy plug-ins. This being the expected result, I didn't look into the issue in any depth.

These days I don't run any kind of Firefox on Puppy any more because it's just too heavy for my old hardware. I run PaleMoon instead. On my newer computers I do run Firefox as my preferred browser.
I'm actually finding that firefox is running surprisingly fast on arch32pup. My guess is that the speed performance has to do with how firefox handles ssl certificates on arch32pup. Arch, uses an "NSS database" for the ssl certificates on firefox and chromium rather than normal text files located in directory folders. If this database is used often is might typically stay in memory (via caching) and consequently reduce the amount of IO usage.

** For more info (see post)

This is just a wild ass guess though. Regarding the plugin you tried; do you know if it was XPCOM type plugin? Firefox once had an even older plugin type (once upon a time) called NPAPI.
Find me on [url=https://www.minds.com/ns_tidder]minds[/url] and on [url=https://www.pearltrees.com/s243a/puppy-linux/id12399810]pearltrees[/url].

User avatar
6502coder
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon 23 Mar 2009, 18:07
Location: Western United States

#12 Post by 6502coder »

s243a wrote:Regarding the plugin you tried; do you know if it was XPCOM type plugin? Firefox once had an even older plugin type (once upon a time) called NPAPI.
I'm not sure, but it was probably NPAPI.

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

#13 Post by ozsouth »

Firefox ESR 32bit Version 68.6.1 - superseded - see below

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

#14 Post by ozsouth »

Firefox ESR 32bit Version 68.7.0 - SUPERSEDED
Last edited by ozsouth on Wed 06 May 2020, 07:07, edited 1 time in total.

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

Firefox 32 ESR announcement

#15 Post by ozsouth »

I have decided to in future, only do MAJOR POINT releases (i.e. 68.6.0 , 68.7.0 etc)
as MINOR POINT releases (i.e. 68.6.1 , 68.6.2 etc) can be done by
simply accepting Firefox's offer of update, when that is made.

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

#16 Post by ozsouth »

Firefox ESR 32bit Version 68.8.0 - SUPERSEDED. See below.

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

#17 Post by ozsouth »

Firefox ESR 32bit Version 68.9.0 - SUPERSEDED - see below.

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

#18 Post by ozsouth »

Firefox ESR 32bit Version 68.10.0 - NOT tested - I don't run 32bit now. (ScPup 32bit needs gtk3 also).

** NO NEED TO CREATE ACCT TO DOWNLOAD

Is here: http://www.filepup.net/files/842e0f491593595720.html (52 mb)

If you installed my previous version, uninstall first. Use at own risk. Install by clicking on .pet in ROX-Filer.

Note: audio for some specialised sites (i.e. talky.io) require you to run this: apulse firefox

ozsouth
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010, 22:08
Location: S.E Australia

Discontinuing

#19 Post by ozsouth »

Release above is almost certainly my last 32bit Firefox ESR .pet
I no longer have any 32bit linux installed, so can't test, & have not been many downloads.
Another 32bit firefox option is available here: http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=119135

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#20 Post by peebee »

and here as sfs (not ESR but normal release):
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lxpup/ ... /browsers/
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

Post Reply