Remasterpup-2018
Posted: Sun 10 Jun 2018, 07:25
READ-ONLY Archive
https://oldforum.puppylinux.com/
Do you have enough space in / ? Script was tested in Wary, Racy, Precise, Tahr and Xenial (32-bit), frugal installs.smokey01 wrote:@nic007 I tried the scrit but it only made an sfs of just under 2M. Something must have gone wrong. I will try again later.
I tested it in slacko-6.9.9.9 and had plenty of space in /. I will post my results on the retry.nic007 wrote:Do you have enough space in / ? Script was tested in Wary, Racy, Precise, Tahr and Xenial (32-bit), frugal installs.smokey01 wrote:@nic007 I tried the scrit but it only made an sfs of just under 2M. Something must have gone wrong. I will try again later.
Thanks, good to know it works with Slacko too. Can you confirm that the application's naming of the remastered base sfs and zdrv is correct according to your distribution? All my distributions have only underscores in its names eg: puppy_racy_5.5.sfs so that may be a potential problem. Cheers.smokey01 wrote:I tested it in slacko-6.9.9.9 and had plenty of space in /. I will post my results on the retry.nic007 wrote:Do you have enough space in / ? Script was tested in Wary, Racy, Precise, Tahr and Xenial (32-bit), frugal installs.smokey01 wrote:@nic007 I tried the scrit but it only made an sfs of just under 2M. Something must have gone wrong. I will try again later.
My Results: It now works fine and really fast. For some reason it picked up a broken puppy_slacko-6.9.9.9.sfs file.
The naming convention was correct. puppy_slacko_6.9.9.9.sfsnic007 wrote:Thanks, good to know it works with Slacko too. Can you confirm that the application's naming of the remastered base sfs and zdrv is correct according to your distribution? All my distributions have only underscores in its names eg: puppy_racy_5.5.sfs so that may be a potential problem. Cheers.
Thankssmokey01 wrote:The naming convention was correct. puppy_slacko_6.9.9.9.sfsnic007 wrote:Thanks, good to know it works with Slacko too. Can you confirm that the application's naming of the remastered base sfs and zdrv is correct according to your distribution? All my distributions have only underscores in its names eg: puppy_racy_5.5.sfs so that may be a potential problem. Cheers.