Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Sun 20 Aug 2017, 11:55
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Projects
Fatdog64-710 Final [4 Dec 2016]
Moderators: Flash, JohnMurga
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
Page 28 of 37 [541 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, ..., 35, 36, 37 Next
Author Message
step

Joined: 04 May 2012
Posts: 895

PostPosted: Fri 28 Apr 2017, 17:12    Post subject:  

@bpuppy2, those sed errors are rather strange, they shouldn't happen. Did you run the command from inside sandbox.sh? If so, run it again outside sandbox.sh.
@SFR, line 104 should be: else if (mode == 4), though it doesn't matter, by chance.

_________________
Fatdog64-710|+Packages|Findnrun|+forum|gtkmenuplus

Last edited by step on Fri 28 Apr 2017, 17:48; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bpuppy2
Guest


PostPosted: Fri 28 Apr 2017, 17:16    Post subject:  

@step

The output comes from outside sandbox.sh already.
Back to top
rufwoof

Joined: 24 Feb 2014
Posts: 2007

PostPosted: Fri 28 Apr 2017, 17:41    Post subject:  

step wrote:
@rufwoof, an unpacked basesfs as the savefolder... it's a neat idea. Did you have a specific application in mind for this setup, or is it just for experimenting?

Its the way I usually prefer to run frugals Step. HDD space nowadays is extremely inexpensive. In the Debian based system I boot as a everyday the save partition is / and again the main sfs is empty ... which means it can also be booted as though a full install; Or be booted frugally without saving (useful for testing things out, or to be using a layered system so that sfs's can also be loaded).

Conceptually for FD if everything is in the save folder and fd64.sfs is empty/non existent as I currently have it setup, then I can make a sfs of that savefolder and reboot using that sfs ... without a 'savefile' as a no changes saved type session for testing things out (just shutdown and not save at the end of the session).

In Debian I run mostly as a restricted user session, so if a hacker breaks out of the browser they drop into a very limited user account (I went around and chmod most folders so that that userid can't get to see other folders/files such as personal documents). For documentation I just ctrl-alt-Fn and login as a normal user ... but don't use that account for any web stuff (kodi, skype, firefox ...etc). Most pup's are single user, FD is multi-user (can also ctrl-alt-F1 for instance and log in). However there's less need for that as FD isolates web programs anyway (run as spot). Another benefit of FD is that its like most other pup's ... already setup and ready to go. Debian is a headache to setup (and the group are nowhere near as friendly either, rather the complete opposite).

One of the best pup's around is FD. The main negative as I see it is not being a rolling release and having to re-setup all over again at each new release.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
step

Joined: 04 May 2012
Posts: 895

PostPosted: Fri 28 Apr 2017, 17:47    Post subject:  

@bpuppy2, try this on a command line
Code:

( . $BOOTSTATE_PATH ; ls -v /sys/fs/aufs/$AUFS_ROOT_ID/br[0-9]* | xargs sed 's/=.*//' )

And if you still get the sed error, that's the reason why dialog fails short of arguments. I'm writing this comment for SFR, when he will be able to take a look again.

_________________
Fatdog64-710|+Packages|Findnrun|+forum|gtkmenuplus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
step

Joined: 04 May 2012
Posts: 895

PostPosted: Fri 28 Apr 2017, 18:05    Post subject:  

@rufwoof, which pups are rolling, do you know? I don't.
_________________
Fatdog64-710|+Packages|Findnrun|+forum|gtkmenuplus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bpuppy2
Guest


PostPosted: Fri 28 Apr 2017, 18:08    Post subject:  

@step: i get same output as previously except the si_# has changed.

bpuppy2
Back to top
SFR


Joined: 26 Oct 2011
Posts: 1633

PostPosted: Sat 29 Apr 2017, 05:32    Post subject:  

step wrote:
And if you still get the sed error, that's the reason why dialog fails short of arguments. I'm writing this comment for SFR, when he will be able to take a look again.

bpuppy2 wrote:
@step: i get same output as previously except the si_# has changed.

Yep, this is most likely the reason why dialog fails.
But why the br* files are inaccessible is another question; maybe it's still the aftermath of updating util-linux..?
The best I can suggest at the moment is to try the sandbox with a clean savefile/folder (having the same set of SFSes loaded) and if it works, just switch to that savefile for good.

Greetings!

_________________
[O]bdurate [R]ules [D]estroy [E]nthusiastic [R]ebels => [C]reative [H]umans [A]lways [O]pen [S]ource
Omnia mea mecum porto.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
stemsee

Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 1967
Location: In The Way

PostPosted: Sat 29 Apr 2017, 16:40    Post subject:  

Has anyone else had issues after upgrading to fd 4.10.8 kernel?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
SFR


Joined: 26 Oct 2011
Posts: 1633

PostPosted: Tue 02 May 2017, 13:20    Post subject:  

stemsee wrote:
Has anyone else had issues after upgrading to fd 4.10.8 kernel?

I was running it for a short while - got problems with sustaining a stable connection to a wireless AP I've set on my laptop (RTL8191SEvB WLAN Controller).
Other than that, seems ok.

Greetings!

_________________
[O]bdurate [R]ules [D]estroy [E]nthusiastic [R]ebels => [C]reative [H]umans [A]lways [O]pen [S]ource
Omnia mea mecum porto.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bpuppy2
Guest


PostPosted: Tue 02 May 2017, 21:32    Post subject:
Subject description: sandbox
 

Yesterday, i booted into Fatdog64 with the savefile loaded and sandbox.sh worked just fine.

I have no idea what or why i had trouble with it before, but now it's ok, so like the old saying, i won't fix it if it ain't broke!

thanks,
bpuppy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Isaac Asimov's AI laws have been violated by 'killer drones'.
Back to top
bpuppy2
Guest


PostPosted: Thu 18 May 2017, 06:34    Post subject: Seamonkey mail  

Hello again,

I am using Seamonkey mailer but can't have it contact my ISP without stopping the firewall. How should i deal with this?
Back to top
watchdog

Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 1403
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Thu 18 May 2017, 08:25    Post subject: Re: Seamonkey mail  

bpuppy2 wrote:
Hello again,

I am using Seamonkey mailer but can't have it contact my ISP without stopping the firewall. How should i deal with this?


Read:

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=936635#936635
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
step

Joined: 04 May 2012
Posts: 895

PostPosted: Thu 18 May 2017, 08:57    Post subject: Re: Seamonkey mail  

bpuppy2 wrote:
Hello again,

I am using Seamonkey mailer but can't have it contact my ISP without stopping the firewall. How should i deal with this?


Try this (untested):

Edit /etc/eztables/eztables.cfg.

Look for the line that starts with BASIC_SERVICES="
Add $MAIL to the list. On my PC the result looks like this
Code:

BASIC_SERVICES="

    $WEB
    $DNS
    $NTP
    $SSH
    $MAIL
"


Insert before BASIC_SERVICES=" this block of lines:
Code:

MAIL="
    25/tcp
    2525/tcp
    110/tcp
    995/tcp
    143/tcp
    993/tcp
    587/tcp
    465/tcp
"


Restart the firewall.
More examples like this >

edit: watchdog beat me to the finish line by a hair! The information we gave is the same. However, be careful cutting and pasting from the link referenced in watchdog's message, because the syntax is wrong. Also, if you need to copy code blocks from a post, click the reply with quote button and copy from the block from the edit box. This way you'll avoid the invisible spaces that this forum software appends to each copied line.

_________________
Fatdog64-710|+Packages|Findnrun|+forum|gtkmenuplus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
eowens2

Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 168

PostPosted: Thu 18 May 2017, 11:53    Post subject: Thunderbird  

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
eowens2

Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 168

PostPosted: Thu 18 May 2017, 12:06    Post subject:  

Is anyone using Thunderbird Version 52.1.0 with Fatdog64_710-Final?

I have been using Thunderbird Version 45.8.0 for the last 6 months, booting it in the manner described by Smokey01 (http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=109067&start=58). But this version of T-bird is now superseded.

However, using the same technique described above to boot T-bird Version 52.1.0 does not work (I cannot find any error log that contains any relevant information).

Any help getting the new T-bird version to boot would be appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 28 of 37 [541 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, ..., 35, 36, 37 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Projects
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0714s ][ Queries: 14 (0.0068s) ][ GZIP on ]