Page 35 of 36

Re: Pupsnap in rc5

Posted: Sun 25 Aug 2019, 19:29
by radky
WiZard wrote:hi radky,

I converted from rc4 to rc5 the first part of August. I copied the rc5 files into a directory and then copied my rc4 save file into the directory. On the first run it did a save file conversion and everything seems to be working well. I have found that pupsnap now thinks that the keyboard up arrow key is its hot key. Is there a file that can be edited to change that setting?

thanks

wiz
@WiZard,

Please see:

http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... 86#1031986
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... 11#1032011

---

As true for the current releases of BionicPup(32/64), keyboard and mouse interactions for the 4.19.56 release of Dpup Stretch are managed by evdev rather than conventional drivers (kbd_drv.so and mouse_drv.so).

In some scenarios, it seems the evdev keybindings for certain keyboards may have mapping issues for the PrtScr, Up and End keys -- at least in the openbox desktop environment.

In the upcoming RC-6 release of Dupup Stretch, management of keyboard and mouse interactions will revert to conventional drivers, but a small script and GUI will be provided for those who prefer input management by evdev.

For now, please try the following if you see mismapping of the PrtScr, Up or End keys in FbBox (openbox and fbpanel):

1 - Go to FbPanel configuration -> Plugins tab -> Key Bindings -> select 'true' -> click Apply
2 - Restart X to automatically reset keybindings for the PrtScr, Up and End keys

Pupsnap in rc5

Posted: Sun 25 Aug 2019, 20:50
by WiZard
@radky

fbpanel was the fix, I had searched in the pupsnap topic and didn't find anything. Should have done a better search to find it right here in the Dpup topic. Will do better in the future.

thanks for your help and patience

wiz

Posted: Mon 09 Sep 2019, 18:14
by tallboy
Hi radky.
I have tried to make a multisession CD-R with the RC-5 version with k4.1.48, and it's latest update of cdrecord. I first made a a few small changes to the default setup to see if it would save the session back to the CD-R, and that worked. I booted the modified CD-R, and it loaded the saved dir as it should. I then made several modifications and additions, saved the session to the CD-R at shutdown and booted again. Bummer!
There is something seriously wrong with woof-CE, because the saved sessions were loaded, I had a screen, but with my old PuppyPin - not the new, I had mouse but no keyboard. I opened a virtual keyboard and an urxvt, and tried to find a solution.
I opened the Mouse/keyboard wizard, and tried to modify my keyboard settting there. I got a message: 'Your xorg.conf file does not contain any XkbModel options.' So I thought I could make an addition to xorg.conf. Hahahaha. You have changed the possibility to make a personal xorg.conf. What the h...? The xorg.conf settings are now automated. I opened the latest savefile on the CD-R, and started to check all my other modifications. I used the same settings as in my RC-4. Some were there, many were gone. There was a new dir made in /, 'include'. Not by me, but by the system. My 22.000 line /etc/hosts was not saved, but the default one was back, even if I deleted it before saving my own.
The whole Puppy's internals are being turned around, there seem to be a mix of old and new. Have anybody tried to remaster the latest version? I think you are in for a surprise.
I admit that the very idea to save to a multisession CD-R, will disappear in a near future. One reason is that the latest Puppys are way to big to load into a RAM-starving old PC, and the old PCs may not be able to use a late model browser with the smaller, old Puppys. But I still have old PCs that won't eat anything that isn't served on a disc, and Stretch is no solution for them. If I cannot remaster a late Puppy to make it smaller, and run it from a CD, those machines go into the garbage, and I dislike that thought very much.
I have seen that BarryK has made an interesting derivative named EasyOS Pyro, which is compiled from source to keep it small, and includes a lot of my favorite programmes. But even that small build is 418Mb, which is a tad to large for an old PC with 500Mb RAM, and his latest Buster EasyOS build is more than 500Mb in size. But they can probably be remastered to a smaller size, if the late kernel is OK for old hardware. I'll play with them a little.

Question: Can the swap partition be loaded earlier in the boot process, and maybe help a large Puppy work on a RAM-starved Linuxbox?

One small issue I noted with RC-5. If you enable the screensaver in Menu->Desktop->pupX set properties of X, it is not enabled i Menu-> Desktop->ScreenSaver Control, but has to be enabled manually there too.

Posted: Tue 10 Sep 2019, 23:31
by radky
tallboy wrote:I have tried to make a mult-isession CD-R with the RC-5 version with k4.1.48, and it's latest update of cdrecord...Bummer!
@tallboy,

In recent Pups, saving the desktop to multi-session optical media is a function of Woof-CE code implemented in December 2016, with additional minor revisions after that date. If I understand correctly, future revisions are considered low priority by our Woof-CE devs since optical drives are becoming increasingly obsolete in most modern PCs.

For old PC hardware, perhaps legacy Pups (released before December 2016) may provide your requested support for multi-session optical media.

Posted: Tue 10 Sep 2019, 23:58
by tallboy
radky, there is an update after the last time I mentioned in RC-4, that I could not save back to a multisession CD-R. That was actually noted as a bug by someone, and a new version of cdrtools is available in woof-CE. I have downloaded the cdrtools-3.02a09-i686_common32.pet. I thought it was included in the latest RC-5, but cdrtools may have been updated after your release date of RC-5.

As mentioned earlier, I also suspect the new policy regarding hostname followed by a number, may make some difficulties concerning the /etc/hosts file, and maybe other files, not being saved back to the CD.

Posted: Tue 08 Oct 2019, 11:54
by OscarTalks
The executable /usr/bin/xxd is required for compiling NetSurf browser.
In DpupStretch 7.5 CE (RC-5) this file is a symlink to busybox, but this fails during the build because of an unrecognised option.

In earlier distros, xxd was part of the vim-common package, but this is now separated out as a package just named xxd

I suggest replacing the busybox symlink with this package. It could probably go in the devx but perhaps in the main .iso since it is small?

Posted: Tue 15 Oct 2019, 02:52
by radky
OscarTalks wrote:The executable /usr/bin/xxd is required for compiling NetSurf browser.
In DpupStretch 7.5 CE (RC-5) this file is a symlink to busybox, but this fails during the build because of an unrecognised option.

In earlier distros, xxd was part of the vim-common package, but this is now separated out as a package just named xxd

I suggest replacing the busybox symlink with this package. It could probably go in the devx but perhaps in the main .iso since it is small?
@OscarTalks,

For the next release of DpupStretch, I will add the xxd binary to the main Puppy sfs.

Thanks :)

bcrypt not working?

Posted: Thu 07 Nov 2019, 12:34
by lizardidi
I am still on Dpup stretch 7.5 CE (RC-4), the bcrypt preinstalled is not working. When try to encrypt file, it says "Encryption is disabled". Is the bcrypt broken?
Further reading on Debian's bug report stated that bcrypt is not safe to use as the algorithm can be predicted.
I posted here because I had not found any bcrypt related changes in the RC5 change log.

bcrypt neither working nor safe -- try veracrypt

Posted: Thu 07 Nov 2019, 15:02
by mikeslr
Hi lizardidi,

With bcrypt neither working nor safe, you might want to use veracrypt as an alternative. The pet I built is available here, https://www.mediafire.com/folder/7m55ivwku6fb5/. You'll want the pet named veracrypt32_1.23.

I particularly like veracrypt as, if I choose, I can create one folder for files I want to protect rather than having to encrypt each file.

Caution: I haven't used it under dpup-stretch to store files. But it does open and appears to be functional. Test it a couple of times before relying on it.

Re: bcrypt not working?

Posted: Fri 08 Nov 2019, 02:40
by radky
lizardidi wrote:I am still on Dpup stretch 7.5 CE (RC-4), the bcrypt preinstalled is not working. When try to encrypt file, it says "Encryption is disabled". Is the bcrypt broken?
Further reading on Debian's bug report stated that bcrypt is not safe to use as the algorithm can be predicted.
I posted here because I had not found any bcrypt related changes in the RC5 change log.
@lizardidi,

Because of security concerns, the Debian devs have disabled the encryption algorithm in the current bcrypt package (1.1-8.1+b1), but the capacity to decrypt existing archives is still intact.

Perhaps it would be best to completely remove bcrypt and bcrypt_gui from Dpup Stretch, but for now they are included for decryption of existing archives.

Thanks for your question.

---

@mikeslr,

Thanks for your recommendation of veracrypt as an alternate encryption utility.

Posted: Fri 08 Nov 2019, 03:20
by lizardidi
@mikeslr
Thanks for the recommendation, I downloaded the .sfs made by you, and currently in the process of learning to use the new tool. Please recommend me other newbie-friendly encryption tools if got any. I found the Pcrypt very easy to use too.

***edit: I tested the 32 bit veracrypt.sfs in dpup-stretch, the .sfs missed the "dmsetup" dependency. dmsetup is needed in order to decrypt the container.



@radky
Looking forward for your Dpup Stretch Ultimate version!

Posted: Fri 22 Nov 2019, 04:32
by Max Headroom
G'day Radky, Thanx 4 this Stretchpup which works so far on an MSi U100 Wind NetBook w/ a N270 1.6 GHz Atom CPU which is Ltd to 2 GB RAMemory. I'm wanting 2 add zram-config, But can't find it in the PPM Repos, or is there a pet which I've Searched for but can't find. Any suggestions Mate?

;-)K

Posted: Fri 22 Nov 2019, 14:43
by mikeslr
lizardidi wrote:***edit: I tested the 32 bit veracrypt.sfs in dpup-stretch, the .sfs missed the "dmsetup" dependency. dmsetup is needed in order to decrypt the container.
Hi lizardidi. Just stumbled on your post. Oddly, even with veracrypt neither installed nor loaded, my systems show /sbin/dmsetup. Wonder where they came from?

Will have to boot into dpup-stretch and rebuild veracrypt under it.

Of course, if you really want to keep prying eyes from reading sensitive information, not being able to decrypt them is the way to go. :lol:

Well, if you really insist on decrypting them, try the new version I've uploaded. :) https://www.mediafire.com/folder/7m55ivwku6fb5/

Posted: Fri 22 Nov 2019, 18:22
by rufwoof
mikeslr wrote:
lizardidi wrote:***edit: I tested the 32 bit veracrypt.sfs in dpup-stretch, the .sfs missed the "dmsetup" dependency. dmsetup is needed in order to decrypt the container.
Hi lizardidi. Just stumbled on your post. Oddly, even with veracrypt neither installed nor loaded, my systems show /sbin/dmsetup. Wonder where they came from?
Isn't dmsetup a lower level command/program

man 8 dmsetup ... indicates
Referenced By
blkdeactivate(8), cmtab(5), cryptsetup(8), fsfreeze(8), lvm(8), lvmchange(8), multipath(8), multipath.conf(5), vgmknodes(8)

Posted: Sat 23 Nov 2019, 02:10
by radky
Max Headroom wrote:G'day Radky, Thanx 4 this Stretchpup which works so far on an MSi U100 Wind NetBook w/ a N270 1.6 GHz Atom CPU which is Ltd to 2 GB RAMemory. I'm wanting 2 add zram-config, But can't find it in the PPM Repos, or is there a pet which I've Searched for but can't find. Any suggestions Mate?
@Max Headroom,

It seems there are no zram tools in the official packages of Debian Stretch.

However, on the Puppy forum, wiak offers an interesting discussion about zram and zswap, and Puppus Dogfellow provides packages for testing this concept in Puppy.

Please see the following link to download those packages shared by Puppus Dogfellow on Google Drive.

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 078#987078

I hope this helps. :)

Posted: Tue 26 Nov 2019, 02:57
by Max Headroom
G'day Radky, Thanx 4 your previous reply, Now my Dpup Stretch 7.5 k4.1.48 isn't finding & Loading my save file, so I have 2 setup at every boot & create another save file at every Shutdown! Can Anybody Help me Please?

What's wRong Please & How can I Fix it? Thanx

Also I've been Trying 2 install Konqueror from the PPM, but it said that I was missing libcryptsetup.so.4 & /usr/bin/dbus-launch. But when I searched 4 libcryptsetup.so.4 in the PPM it told me that it was Already installed! & I dunno about the dbus-launch bit?

Please Help, Thanx...

;-)K

samba share

Posted: Wed 08 Jan 2020, 00:31
by WiZard
Hi radky

Running 7.5 rc5 and set up a network share using samba simple management. If I use another puppy computer to access the share it works fine. If I try to access using windows 7 explorer it shows the sharename. Double clicking the share it ask for username/pw. Enter root & woofwoof. It returns "access denied" and ask for password again. Entering the pw again just loops the process.

Seems it can't share with windows, any ideas how to fix it?

thanks
wiz

Posted: Wed 08 Jan 2020, 05:14
by lizardidi
Max Headroom wrote:
Also I've been Trying 2 install Konqueror from the PPM, but it said that I was missing libcryptsetup.so.4 & /usr/bin/dbus-launch. But when I searched 4 libcryptsetup.so.4 in the PPM it told me that it was Already installed! & I dunno about the dbus-launch bit?

Please Help, Thanx...

;-)K
Not sure if this will help you. I made a konqueror.sfs based on packages from PPM, and tested running fine in Dpup Stretch. If you need it can get the .sfs here:

https://www.filehosting.org/file/detail ... _32bit.sfs

To use, simply download the file and load it.

samba share

Posted: Fri 10 Jan 2020, 02:33
by WiZard
Hi radky

This is an update to the first post. Did some additional testing,

I used the same hardware as above and created shares with slacko 6.3. Both puppy and windows clients could access without any issues. Also, used completely different hardware and set up shares with stretch 7.5 rc5. Tried to access with windows 10 client and got the same "access denied" error. This seems like an issue with the samba implementation in stretch 7.5

thanks
wiz

samba share

Posted: Tue 14 Jan 2020, 16:49
by WiZard
Hi radky

UPDATE to 07 Jan samba share issue

issue is:

-stretch 7.5 rc5 samba simple management used to create shares
-puppy clients can access shares
-windows clients can see shares, but return "access denied" error when username and password are entered

Latest test:
-add "guest ok = yes" to samba.conf global section (tells samba no password is required)
-windows clients can now access shares

This seems to indicate samba is not accepting the password from windows clients.

This fix works fine for my use, but would not be good for someone that wants password protection of shares.

thanks
wiz