Posted: Mon 19 Sep 2011, 19:07
Hmmm, maybe I should remove gtkdialog binary..... 
(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
READ-ONLY Archive
https://oldforum.puppylinux.com/
Dpup Exprimo 5.X.3.1.10.3 SMP multicore optimized version
Page 3 of 53
Posted: Mon 19 Sep 2011, 19:13
added a pic but the pic of 12 or more is too large to post.
Posted: Mon 19 Sep 2011, 19:19
Yeah, Idrive panel has been put in so that people can test it with e17. It has showed that it is not overly compliant under e17.
Idrivepanel
Posted: Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:25
Indeed even in 5X6 I saw already that there are multiple gtk and I drivepanel processes.
Posted: Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:27
Thats interesting. I wonder what creates those multiple processes.
Posted: Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:28
Is it on purpose that the SMP and non-SMP ISO have the same name and size?
Posted: Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:36
The distro name inside the build is different. And I created different threads for them.
And yes, both have almost same kernel specs, only other is optimized for multicores and other for intel atom, they use same woof version, overall apps, and version numbers are the same. I added some usability stuff more to the main version, and some small apps.
But there is overall 993 packages, 99 % is the same.
So....I thought it is much easier for me to remember the stuff inside when people refer to 5.X.7 version. Also, there isnt much need to update to the main version from this SMP multicore version atm.
I could have named this one totally different, but this uses stuff intended to the main 5.X.7 so....
And yes, both have almost same kernel specs, only other is optimized for multicores and other for intel atom, they use same woof version, overall apps, and version numbers are the same. I added some usability stuff more to the main version, and some small apps.
But there is overall 993 packages, 99 % is the same.
So....I thought it is much easier for me to remember the stuff inside when people refer to 5.X.7 version. Also, there isnt much need to update to the main version from this SMP multicore version atm.
I could have named this one totally different, but this uses stuff intended to the main 5.X.7 so....
Posted: Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:41
I just launched Idrive panel.pemasu wrote:Thats interesting. I wonder what creates those multiple processes.
Code: Select all
# ps |grep Idrivepanel
17329 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
17337 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
17731 root 0:00 gtkdialog3 -p Idrivepanel --class Idrive --geometry 850x90+1+1000
20532 root 0:00 grep Idrivepanel
# Posted: Mon 19 Sep 2011, 21:09
Beem. If you mount and unmount several times, do you get accumulating count of them
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 08:19
Tried in 5X6 still.pemasu wrote:Beem. If you mount and unmount several times, do you get accumulating count of them
No, I didn't get accumulation of processes.
But I booted this morning from 5X6 still and did get now:
Code: Select all
# ps |grep Idrivepanel
8437 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
8660 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
8728 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
8904 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
8990 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
9205 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
9283 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
9523 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
9616 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
9820 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
9932 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
9956 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
10077 root 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/Idrivepanel
10127 root 0:00 gtkdialog3 -p Idrivepanel --class Idrive --geometry 850x90+1+1000
10644 root 0:00 gtkdialog3 -p Idrivepanel --class Idrive --geometry 850x90+1+1000
11018 root 0:00 gtkdialog3 -p Idrivepanel --class Idrive --geometry 850x90+1+1000
11376 root 0:00 gtkdialog3 -p Idrivepanel --class Idrive --geometry 850x90+1+1000
11499 root 0:00 gtkdialog3 -p Idrivepanel --class Idrive --geometry 850x90+1+1000
11525 root 0:00 gtkdialog3 -p Idrivepanel --class Idrive --geometry 850x90+1+1000
11823 root 0:00 grep Idrivepanel
# But I get now 5 gtkdialog entries in the window list.
They indicate different states of Idrivepanel.
One is really significant. Very weird.
Idrivepanel
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 09:02
I have installed 5X7 SMP.
Idrivepanel is in Startup.
I don't seem to have those multiple gtkdialog processes.
Every time I click in th Idrivepanel icon in the tray, I have a supplementary Idrivepanel process, but I only keep one corresponding gtkdialog process.
Idrivepanel is in Startup.
I don't seem to have those multiple gtkdialog processes.
Every time I click in th Idrivepanel icon in the tray, I have a supplementary Idrivepanel process, but I only keep one corresponding gtkdialog process.
Installation of 5X7 SMP
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 09:05
I did the usual FRUGAL Lin'N'Win install and activated my application environment.
My applications seem to work.
I will report separately on issues.
One question tho: In order to avoid each time to make E17 to my liking, could I take /root/.e from a previuos install and use it?
My applications seem to work.
I will report separately on issues.
One question tho: In order to avoid each time to make E17 to my liking, could I take /root/.e from a previuos install and use it?
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 09:08
Beem. Yes you can. Delete first the preinstalled one and then copy your configured version. Thats what I do also.
And do that when you are on JWM. The deleting takes effect immediately. I have tested, lol.
And do that when you are on JWM. The deleting takes effect immediately. I have tested, lol.
geany beyond screen size
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 09:12
I still have the issue that geany is too wide for my screen.
Very annoying.
Very annoying.
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 09:14
Thank you. Good news.pemasu wrote:Beem. Yes you can. Delete first the preinstalled one and then copy your configured version. Thats what I do also.
And do that when you are on JWM. The deleting takes effect immediately. I have tested, lol.
I will put the .e directory outside the save file and symlink to it.
Re: geany beyond screen size
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 09:17
Will Geany accept a 'geometry' tag in the loader? Something like 'geometry=650x545'Béèm wrote:I still have the issue that geany is too wide for my screen.
Very annoying.
Re: geany beyond screen size
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:26
See geany --helpDaveS wrote:Will Geany accept a 'geometry' tag in the loader? Something like 'geometry=650x545'Béèm wrote:I still have the issue that geany is too wide for my screen.
Very annoying.
No geometry option.
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:22
Beem. Geany should remember the last session windows geometry and position.
If not, then check in geany > preferences > save shutdown windows geometry and position, that it is ticked.
To hack the parameters straight, check /root/.config/geany/geany.conf and Geometry row in it, there is only one row, where the position and geometry has been defined.
If not, then check in geany > preferences > save shutdown windows geometry and position, that it is ticked.
To hack the parameters straight, check /root/.config/geany/geany.conf and Geometry row in it, there is only one row, where the position and geometry has been defined.
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 18:14
Indeed pemasu, when the previous session is too wide, the next one is wide as well.
I'll look into the config file then.
But this situation has been introduced somewhere around 5X3 I think.
I'll look into the config file then.
But this situation has been introduced somewhere around 5X3 I think.
Posted: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 18:17
Beem. I mean, if you resize by dragging with mouse the position and geometry of Geany and then quit, does it not remember that resized geometry.