Whats your iq?

For stuff that really doesn't have ANYTHING to do with Puppy
Message
Author
User avatar
Mike Walsh
Posts: 6351
Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
Location: King's Lynn, UK.

#41 Post by Mike Walsh »

@ musher0:-

Um.....I have to agree with 8Geee on this point, y'know.

Yes, it helps to have a good spread of general knowledge. But a large part of the test's focus is not just 'general knowledge', but equally (if not more so), it's interested in exactly how you apply what you know.

Literally being able to 'think outside the box'. Some people can do this, innately, without even knowing or understanding how it is that they can do so. The brain forms new connections all the time, and it's able to detect certain of those pathways, and to 'reinforce' them if it detects that they're getting more use than others. Thus, a 'regular' pathway is already well on its way to becoming habitual.....

(It's like my answer to bigpup's '6 fish in the pond' question. You have to read such things literally - 'how many are in the pond?' It's your 'common-sense' that assumes the dead ones have been removed.....but nowhere does it say that's the case. So, you answer the question literally, as read.....)


Mike. :wink:

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#42 Post by musher0 »

@Mike_Walsh:
I thought your answer to bigpup's fish question was brilliant (and hilarious!).
But it was about fish and numbers -- concepts every body knows.

8Gee's "b" point in his Esaki-whatchamakallit graph is another order.
If you don't know science all that well, you're cooked.

As he mentioned, culture is one factor: I suspect my joke fell flat on "semi-expert"
because in his culture there are no folk tales where princesses kiss frogs to bring
them back to human form? ( And perhaps no annoying French-speaking minority
nearby!? :lol: )

Of course there are many types of intelligence and reasoning: deductive, empirical,
analogical, text-based, image-based, fuzzy-logic, to name a few.

And then, as an extreme case perhaps, how would you measure the IQ of the Ancient
Incas who managed their empire for many centuries with knots on colored strings on a
more or less star-shaped or drop-down design? Incas did not have a written language,
but they had specialists who knew the various meanings of those "quipus".

Image
I find quipus absolutely fascinating. I think you have to be highly intelligent to figure
them out.

Intelligence is multi-facetted... IMO there is no single way to measure it.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

backi
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2011, 22:00
Location: GERMANY

#43 Post by backi »

Intelligence is multi-facetted... IMO there is no single way to measure it.
d'ac­cord !

User avatar
rufwoof
Posts: 3690
Joined: Mon 24 Feb 2014, 17:47

#44 Post by rufwoof »

Mike Walsh wrote:(It's like my answer to bigpup's '6 fish in the pond' question. You have to read such things literally - 'how many are in the pond?'
None ... until you look. (Or is that too quantum?).
[size=75]( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) :wq[/size]
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=1028256#1028256][size=75]Fatdog multi-session usb[/url][/size]
[size=75][url=https://hashbang.sh]echo url|sed -e 's/^/(c/' -e 's/$/ hashbang.sh)/'|sh[/url][/size]

User avatar
Mike Walsh
Posts: 6351
Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
Location: King's Lynn, UK.

#45 Post by Mike Walsh »

Hey, ruffers:-

No, no, no, for God's sake, don't start dragging Schrödinger's danged cat into this, fer Chrissakes..... :shock: :o :lol: :lol:


Mike. :wink:

User avatar
tallboy
Posts: 1760
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010, 21:56
Location: Drøbak, Norway

#46 Post by tallboy »

I once read, that fast peeling of potatos involves far more brain cells to view, register, feel, and syncronize the hands, fingers and peeler, compared to solving some serious math equations. So, who is more intelligent, based on merits; the worlds fastest potato peeler, or a mathematician? :?:
True freedom is a live Puppy on a multisession CD/DVD.

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#47 Post by musher0 »

Mike Walsh wrote:Hey, ruffers:-

No, no, no, for God's sake, don't start dragging Schrödinger's danged cat into this, fer Chrissakes..... :shock: :o :lol: :lol:


Mike. :wink:
Hi, Mike_Walsh.

Thank for expanding my mind... (Which is not difficult since I don't have a IQ! :twisted: )
I did not know what a Schrödinger cat was, so I looked it up.

Turns out one can also have a "Schrödinger Date" and a "Schrödinger Boyfriend /
Girlfriend" in the "urban" vocabulary.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define. ... 27s%20Date

Can be fun if you remove the uranium and the poison from the experiment. :twisted:

BFN.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

User avatar
bigpup
Posts: 13886
Joined: Sun 11 Oct 2009, 18:15
Location: S.C. USA

#48 Post by bigpup »

1
Attachments
stupid-people_01.jpg
(51.76 KiB) Downloaded 15 times
The things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected :shock:
YaPI(any iso installer)

Post Reply