Classic Pup 2.14X -- Updated 2 series
- 37fleetwood
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Fri 10 Aug 2007, 03:25
I've been watching this thread with much interest. it seems this is the direction Puppy should have gone.
I've been playing with RC-5 and am very impressed! I have one request before you release the final, instead of GQview, can you swap it for Geeqie? GQview is the old dead project, someone has picked the project up and made many very good improvements in Geeqie. it uses GTK2, I don't know enough to know if that will be a problem. it's about the same basic size, puppyluvr made a .pet for use in his Puppy Artist Workshop (based on 4.12) not sure it is usable as it is, but the thread for P.A.W. is here:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=40876
the Geeqie .Pet is on page 5.
the link to the page for Geeqie is here:
http://geeqie.sourceforge.net/
either way thank you for all your work on this great re-vamping of 2.14, Amazing!
I've been playing with RC-5 and am very impressed! I have one request before you release the final, instead of GQview, can you swap it for Geeqie? GQview is the old dead project, someone has picked the project up and made many very good improvements in Geeqie. it uses GTK2, I don't know enough to know if that will be a problem. it's about the same basic size, puppyluvr made a .pet for use in his Puppy Artist Workshop (based on 4.12) not sure it is usable as it is, but the thread for P.A.W. is here:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=40876
the Geeqie .Pet is on page 5.
the link to the page for Geeqie is here:
http://geeqie.sourceforge.net/
either way thank you for all your work on this great re-vamping of 2.14, Amazing!
[color=darkblue][b]Thanks!
Scott 8) [/b][/color]
[color=darkblue][size=150]I'm a PC... Without Windows[/size][/color]
Scott 8) [/b][/color]
[color=darkblue][size=150]I'm a PC... Without Windows[/size][/color]
You could update or change you kernel patching it with a newer squashfs version, then this new kernel will be able to load different SFS versions in 214X.Dingo wrote:Yes, I discovered this behavior when I made myMinHundHettePerro wrote:2byte
As to click-mounting .sfs-files in Rox: it works very well for squashfs-files of version 3.0, as used in puppy series 2 (and, I think series 3) but, not for squashfs ver. 3.1, as used in 4.12, nor for squashfs ver. 4, as used in later puppies, quirkies, waries etc.
*sfs compatibility chart*
In full install it´s very easy to accomplish, and you can simplify the work if you compile BarryK patched sources (I used 2.16.8.8 patched with squashfs 3.3 version). For frugal is a little more complicated, I´m experimenting with this right now and I have reached some good results with a small effort. There is a good thread about this process, I shared some of my own experiences here:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 1&start=52
In Puppy 214X there are many additional drivers in zdrv_214.sfs file (as we learned with the full installation problems that we had in past releases). The problem is know what should be left in the zdv file and what should go in the pup_xxx.sfs file, there are some size considerations but I don´t know a general rule or standard for that.
I also found some redundant information in zdrv_214.sfs and pup_214.sfs files, for example the Ndiswrapper module is in both SFS files but the size and date are different, I suppose Puppy modprobe script (a workaround/wraper used by Barry to load external modules in zdrv) uses the one from pup_214X.sfs because it´s found first, anyway its unnecessary to have that redundancy.
I think if we do a deep search and classification for these files we could reduce the pup file, moving some modules to the zdr file, obviously the zdrv size will be increased but the boot time and memory consumption will be lower for 2.14X.
The attached pic shows the redundant Ndiswrapper module in zdrv (upper) and pup (bottom) SFS files.
clarf
- Attachments
-
- ndiswrapper_redundant_file.png
- The one Ndiswrapper file from pup_214X.sfs is newer
- (188.01 KiB) Downloaded 1711 times
- Colonel Panic
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09
Seconded. I've downloaded and am using Geeqie now and it's as good as GQView was.37fleetwood wrote:I've been watching this thread with much interest. it seems this is the direction Puppy should have gone.
I've been playing with RC-5 and am very impressed! I have one request before you release the final, instead of GQview, can you swap it for Geeqie? GQview is the old dead project, someone has picked the project up and made many very good improvements in Geeqie. it uses GTK2, I don't know enough to know if that will be a problem. it's about the same basic size, puppyluvr made a .pet for use in his Puppy Artist Workshop (based on 4.12) not sure it is usable as it is, but the thread for P.A.W. is here:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=40876
the Geeqie .Pet is on page 5.
the link to the page for Geeqie is here:
http://geeqie.sourceforge.net/
either way thank you for all your work on this great re-vamping of 2.14, Amazing!
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.
Hm, seeing the updated series two getting more and more followers I really start to wonder if it would be a good base for new derivatives. Since I'm not willing to read well over 300 pages of thread, could someone enlighten me please, what is 2.14x all about?
Which difference is there between the architecture of 2.14 and say the 4. series?
Is there a webpage with a FAQ?
Which pet packages will work, can I use the latest ubuntu .deb- packages?
Can I remaster it?
Thanks in advance for your information.
Christian
Which difference is there between the architecture of 2.14 and say the 4. series?
Is there a webpage with a FAQ?
Which pet packages will work, can I use the latest ubuntu .deb- packages?
Can I remaster it?
Thanks in advance for your information.
Christian
- yorkiesnorkie
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon 04 Jun 2007, 13:11
- Location: George's Island
Compiling Applications
Hi
Quick question. Is there a devx sfs file for 2.14x? I wanted to compile an application for it , clamav 0.96, but I found the lowest version sfs at Ibiblio is devx_216.sfs. It made me wonder if there's something special for 2.14x or if there are other secrets!
y.
Quick question. Is there a devx sfs file for 2.14x? I wanted to compile an application for it , clamav 0.96, but I found the lowest version sfs at Ibiblio is devx_216.sfs. It made me wonder if there's something special for 2.14x or if there are other secrets!
y.
[url]http://www.busygamemaster.com[/url]
It was just a couple of pages back, see here.......
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 526#412526
I think the actual devx is is at......
http://puppylinux.ca/tpp/ttuuxxx/2.14se ... 4X-RC2.pet
HTH.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 526#412526
I think the actual devx is is at......
http://puppylinux.ca/tpp/ttuuxxx/2.14se ... 4X-RC2.pet
HTH.
- yorkiesnorkie
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon 04 Jun 2007, 13:11
- Location: George's Island
geometry of mrxvt
I cannot figure out how to increase the size of the mrxvt screen. I need it to be at least 80 X 30 -- but I can't find where to make the adjustment in the .mrxvtrc for this version of mrxvt.
In the meantime, I have used a .mrxvtrc from a earlier version of mrxvt. This "sort of works"....but I have lost some of the features from the installed version.
Is the correct description of items in the .mrxvtrc "Mrxvt." or "mrxvt*"? The installed version uses "Mrxvt." The earlier version uses "mrxvt*". (omitting the quotation marks)
Help!
In the meantime, I have used a .mrxvtrc from a earlier version of mrxvt. This "sort of works"....but I have lost some of the features from the installed version.
Is the correct description of items in the .mrxvtrc "Mrxvt." or "mrxvt*"? The installed version uses "Mrxvt." The earlier version uses "mrxvt*". (omitting the quotation marks)
Help!
[color=green][i]Don -- Thailand[/i][/color]
[url=http://www.puppylinux.com][img]http://tinypic.com/4e0tojl.jpg[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.puppylinux.com][img]http://tinypic.com/4e0tojl.jpg[/img][/url]
- MinHundHettePerro
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Thu 05 Feb 2009, 22:22
- Location: SE
Re: geometry of mrxvt
Hello !don922 wrote:I cannot figure out how to increase the size of the mrxvt screen. I need it to be at least 80 X 30 -- but I can't find where to make the adjustment in the .mrxvtrc for this version of mrxvt.
In the meantime, I have used a .mrxvtrc from a earlier version of mrxvt. This "sort of works"....but I have lost some of the features from the installed version.
Is the correct description of items in the .mrxvtrc "Mrxvt." or "mrxvt*"? The installed version uses "Mrxvt." The earlier version uses "mrxvt*". (omitting the quotation marks)
Help!
Add the line
Code: Select all
Mrxvt.geometry: 80x30
rgds/
MHHP
[color=green]Celeron 2.8 GHz, 1 GB, i82845, many ptns, modes 12, 13
Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz, 1 GB, nvidia quadro nvs 285[/color]
Slackos & 214X, ... and Q6xx
[color=darkred]Nämen, vaf....[/color] [color=green]ln -s /dev/null MHHP[/color]
Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz, 1 GB, nvidia quadro nvs 285[/color]
Slackos & 214X, ... and Q6xx
[color=darkred]Nämen, vaf....[/color] [color=green]ln -s /dev/null MHHP[/color]
- MinHundHettePerro
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Thu 05 Feb 2009, 22:22
- Location: SE
ttuuxxx
In 214X, on first boot I've always had geany to open too large a window, and offset at that ........
Perhaps this post would apply also to 214X .
Cheers /
MHHP
In 214X, on first boot I've always had geany to open too large a window, and offset at that ........
Perhaps this post would apply also to 214X .
Cheers /
MHHP
[color=green]Celeron 2.8 GHz, 1 GB, i82845, many ptns, modes 12, 13
Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz, 1 GB, nvidia quadro nvs 285[/color]
Slackos & 214X, ... and Q6xx
[color=darkred]Nämen, vaf....[/color] [color=green]ln -s /dev/null MHHP[/color]
Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz, 1 GB, nvidia quadro nvs 285[/color]
Slackos & 214X, ... and Q6xx
[color=darkred]Nämen, vaf....[/color] [color=green]ln -s /dev/null MHHP[/color]
- yorkiesnorkie
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon 04 Jun 2007, 13:11
- Location: George's Island
I use the Geany tag at the bottom of the screen and right click, and maximize. That usually brings it back within the visible area. I've an 800x600 display so that happens sometimes with different windows. Some of the preference windows in Seamonkey for example...
y.
y.
[url]http://www.busygamemaster.com[/url]
- yorkiesnorkie
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon 04 Jun 2007, 13:11
- Location: George's Island
Problems with the 2.14x rc5 Iso
Hi,
Has anyone else had problems with the 2.14xrc5 iso? I downloaded it, and burned it to cd but on booting from the live cd I get
I thought that was odd. I ran md5sum on the iso and it checks out ok.
I downloaded the iso again on our other pc, ran the md5sum check, it was ok, burned it to cd on that machine, and... I got the same error.
I had just burned an iso of 4.3.1 using the same media (brand of cd) and it works...
I'm not sure what I should do next.
Edit: found this post this morning which is related to it... http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 6718bb7e89
The md5sum checks out so I'm not quite sure where to go next with this one. The CD drive will boot other Puppy live CDs so I think I can rule that out. Maybe I just got two bad burns for whatever reason. I'll give rc4 iso a go in the meantime and see if that one works. It'll get me where I want to go for the moment although I'd like to run rc5.
y.
Has anyone else had problems with the 2.14xrc5 iso? I downloaded it, and burned it to cd but on booting from the live cd I get
Code: Select all
invalid compression format (err 2)
I thought that was odd. I ran md5sum on the iso and it checks out ok.
I downloaded the iso again on our other pc, ran the md5sum check, it was ok, burned it to cd on that machine, and... I got the same error.
I had just burned an iso of 4.3.1 using the same media (brand of cd) and it works...
I'm not sure what I should do next.
Edit: found this post this morning which is related to it... http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 6718bb7e89
The md5sum checks out so I'm not quite sure where to go next with this one. The CD drive will boot other Puppy live CDs so I think I can rule that out. Maybe I just got two bad burns for whatever reason. I'll give rc4 iso a go in the meantime and see if that one works. It'll get me where I want to go for the moment although I'd like to run rc5.
y.
[url]http://www.busygamemaster.com[/url]
Re: Problems with the 2.14x rc5 Iso
When you downloaded RC5, did you get the entire 115 MB? I downloaded the day it was released and have had no problem either installing or running live.yorkiesnorkie wrote:Hi,
Has anyone else had problems with the 2.14xrc5 iso? I downloaded it, and burned it to cd but on booting from the live cd I get
Code: Select all
invalid compression format (err 2)
I thought that was odd. I ran md5sum on the iso and it checks out ok.
I downloaded the iso again on our other pc, ran the md5sum check, it was ok, burned it to cd on that machine, and... I got the same error.
I had just burned an iso of 4.3.1 using the same media (brand of cd) and it works...
I'm not sure what I should do next.
Edit: found this post this morning which is related to it... http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 6718bb7e89
The md5sum checks out so I'm not quite sure where to go next with this one. The CD drive will boot other Puppy live CDs so I think I can rule that out. Maybe I just got two bad burns for whatever reason. I'll give rc4 iso a go in the meantime and see if that one works. It'll get me where I want to go for the moment although I'd like to run rc5.
y.
Corrupted files are a real pain......
yorkiesnorkie
This could be an old burn problem....burning too fast at 32x will often wreck a good download, where burning at 8x works OK - if the MD5 hash is good
Different CDR makes also sometimes give problems with some hardware
Try a different make of CDR, if slower burn doesn't work
A final [odd] possibility I've had is when an ISO is saved as a compressed file, by Nero, instead of an ISO - solution, rename the file extension from .zip to .iso
HTH
Aitch
This could be an old burn problem....burning too fast at 32x will often wreck a good download, where burning at 8x works OK - if the MD5 hash is good
Different CDR makes also sometimes give problems with some hardware
Try a different make of CDR, if slower burn doesn't work
A final [odd] possibility I've had is when an ISO is saved as a compressed file, by Nero, instead of an ISO - solution, rename the file extension from .zip to .iso
HTH
Aitch
- yorkiesnorkie
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon 04 Jun 2007, 13:11
- Location: George's Island
Hi,
If your getting a 115 mb iso, that isn't what I got... My iso download is 118360kb... same download twice... and I got that from puppylinux.ca In ROX it shows the filesize as 116mb. All I can attest to is that the download I have here does not work. All I can do is try the download again and see what the total kb is on the third go around.
y.
If your getting a 115 mb iso, that isn't what I got... My iso download is 118360kb... same download twice... and I got that from puppylinux.ca In ROX it shows the filesize as 116mb. All I can attest to is that the download I have here does not work. All I can do is try the download again and see what the total kb is on the third go around.
y.
[url]http://www.busygamemaster.com[/url]
- yorkiesnorkie
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Mon 04 Jun 2007, 13:11
- Location: George's Island
All burns of the iso files were performed from within puppy linux 4.3.1 one at 4x and the other at 1x. I do this all the time and both burners do work. Like I said I made a new 4.3.1 cd right before the others using the same media at 4x and it works.Aitch wrote:yorkiesnorkie
This could be an old burn problem....burning too fast at 32x will often wreck a good download, where burning at 8x works OK - if the MD5 hash is good
Different CDR makes also sometimes give problems with some hardware
Try a different make of CDR, if slower burn doesn't work
A final [odd] possibility I've had is when an ISO is saved as a compressed file, by Nero, instead of an ISO - solution, rename the file extension from .zip to .iso
HTH
Aitch
I might have a bad download if the file size does not match what I'm reading here. I don't understand why the md5sum isn't erroring out. I'm going to look into that again momentarily.
y.
[url]http://www.busygamemaster.com[/url]
The iso file on my hard drive is 118,360 Kb as well, just checked 30 seconds ago, and when I mouseover it shows 115 mb. Difference between kb and mb and rounding off......
I concur with Aitch, it could be the burning speed.
I generally try to burn as slow as possible,usually 4X , however I recently changer burner drive and anything I burned at 4X was a coaster........started burning at 16x and the discs boot again. Just a thought.
I concur with Aitch, it could be the burning speed.
I generally try to burn as slow as possible,usually 4X , however I recently changer burner drive and anything I burned at 4X was a coaster........started burning at 16x and the discs boot again. Just a thought.