jpeps wrote:version: 6.1 bug: removed "/" for relative paths
changed exit button to remove /tmp/gnewpetDir (flag)
RSH: You can report bugs, but you are NOT free to post new versions of my script. You can do whatever you like for your personal copy. REMOVE IT PROMPTLY.
What does this mean?
Ok, before i will come to your post, let me make something clear.
After my last post i was convinced you will come to a point of view to realize that there's something to be changed/fixed in gnewpet-6.0. I was willing (right then, when you do upload the new version) to give my grateful thanks to you, for having an ear to my suggestions and ideas and for doing some work on these suggestions and ideas of mine. I do know different (strange) behavior coming from other forum members like sending pm to user to keep information away from me
Though you are sometimes a bit "lazy" you did get your "ass up" as you did see the usefulness of these my suggestions and ideas. Seems like you do need sometimes a second thought about things - but that's absolutely fine with me.
I was willing to remove the script (including my modifications) after you publish your fixed .pet because just to prevent users to destroy the fixed gnewpet by downloading and installing this script. There has been no need to invite me to do that with "NOT" and "REMOVE IT PROMPTLY"
You still remember where it has had its start? A topic of mine, asking a (now to me) simple question about shellscript - and then came
recobayu
recobayu wrote:hi everyone,
i'm sorry where to put my question, i hope in this thread is ok.
i finished download aqualung with ppm, and it was installed on my laptop.
now, i look at /root/.package/aqualung-0.9b11-Lucid.files there are many rows representating the file i download.
it's like this:
/usr/
/usr/local/
/usr/local/lib/
/usr/local/lib/X11/
/usr/local/lib/X11/mini-icons/
/usr/local/lib/X11/mini-icons/aqualung.png
/usr/lib/
/usr/lib/libmpcdec.so.3.1.1
/usr/lib/libmpcdec.so.3
...
actually, i can put them one by one. but if there are some script, it can be more fast and interesting.
how to repackage again in a pet or a folder with a script? so i don't need download that aqualung again.
thanks
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... 162#588162
So, the basic idea of all of this is "owned" by recobayu.
Then after you posting a static 4-liner-code came
puppyluvr.
puppyluvr wrote: Hello,
I dont believe that is a complete list, as the binaries etc are not listed..
Add them all before making a pet..
Anyone want to help with a script to read the final /* lines in any /root/.packages file, then copy the actual files to a dir...
RePet-1.0
I cant remember how to get cat to ignore things...
After this you did post your first script.
Then it goes back to my issue for some posts.
Then you did refine your script "...to read the original pet.specs and make the duplicate..."
Then i did develop my Package-Creator and RightClick-Package-Creator, that uses your script and gives the comfort of GUI and/or rightclick-action.
So the basic idea to use it with GUI is "owned" by myself.
8.5 hours after this you did develop your gnewpet 1.1 using GUI.
Then there were suggestions etc. by
recobayu,
harii4 and
seaside
Then i found the -P bug and did publish it...
RSH wrote:Just change "cp -p "$line" /tmp/${NAME}${DIR}" to this: "cp -p -P "$line" /tmp/${NAME}${DIR}".
-P says "don't follow symbolic links". So symbolic links will be re-copied as symbolic links inside the .pet.
So gnewpet's full functionality is "owned" by me.
You did never really improve your work in detail!
Then you published fixed version 2.1
Then i did made suggestions that has had its result in batchmode of gnewpet-3.1.
So, the basic idea of batchmode functionality is "owned" by me.
New suggestions of mine did result in refining the GUI and publishing gnewpet-4.1
So, the basic idea of the new GUI is "owned" by me.
And so on...
Version 5.1 was the last one i have had seen as i discovered Version 5.9. Then i did made some suggestions that results in version 6.0 (after a second tought about things)
So the basic idea of "relative path" functionality is "owned" by me.
So lets assume murga-linux.com forum is our employer and we would get payed for this our work in here. This would mean every idea and every attached .pet and/or code would be owned by this our employer.
After this much suggestions and ideas (not only of myself) to call this one "my script" is a bit "highly used" - didn't you mean that as well.
I take gnewpet 6.0 (6.1) as a script (application), owned by many forum members and (much appreciated) nicely worked out by
jpeps. This is the status quo.
For today/tonight and in my special case there is something more to say:
Today/tonight i did work for hours and hours, to get your gnewpet-6.0 working and to get you convinced that there is a need to fix/change something. While i was coding, improving and posting results etc. did you execute small talk about things that should be the only one way but obviously had been the impossible other way.
I did neglected some of my main work on LazY Puppy meanwhile, because i do like the gnewpet (now fixed) that much, so i had decide to make this one a part of "my" LazY Puppy.
And then, after a full night without sleep, getting this one finally working and then fixed, came you and
wrote:RSH: You can report bugs, but you are NOT free to post new versions of my script. You can do whatever you like for your personal copy. REMOVE IT PROMPTLY.
How shall i take this from you? As a declaration of war (in a lower use)?
I would like to prefer something like this:
"RSH, would you please remove your posted script, to prevent users from downloading this script and probably destroying my new fixed version? Thank you."
This really would have been fine, but unfortunately...
As someone wrote:
"Different countries, different languages, different language-basements, different cultures etc." could result in much ugly misunderstandings.
Short story:
I was just
and you came along with
This is not a basement to get me to remove the script. I will edit the post to inform users not to download the script. That's all that i can do for you and "your" gnewpet" at this time. Sorry, maybe a second thought (by you) will do it?