i'm very aware of what he wrote then it's almost 4 years oldWhoDo wrote:I didn't! Read Barry Kauler's piece on the Puppy development model and mark, learn and inwardly digest the wisdom in those powerful words!jonyo wrote:and when did you become a spokesperson?WhoDo wrote: Not with Puppy! Like it, build your own or leave it!
Ummm... when I coordinated 4.2x development we had a wiki page(s) devoted to tasks and assignments. That didn't stop some people from whining that their suggestions weren't implemented. Some people don't get that sometimes their suggestions are just impossible to implement, or plain crap! That didn't stop us from trying, of course, but nothing short of complete capitulation would satisfy some people and that doesn't sit well with VOLUNTEERS! Wake up and smell the coffee, jonyo, or at the very least use Wellminded to research the Puppy history you seem hell-bent on repeating! Doh, indeed!jonyo wrote:i guess what some vets have to say that no one has responded to yet is irrelevant, seems to me that aitch is some sort of spokesperson
and here's what he has to say just recently
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 690#517690Bug fixing/tracking.....
Is it POSSIBLE to at least devise a list, if not a small database, of
1/ bugs,
2/ pending/fixed status, and
3/ whether the fix is a patch,
4/ modifying some code,
5/ an addition, or whatever,
6/ how many testers have checked, and
7/ if any new errors arise, etc, and
8/ whether finally signed off, or not
Shouldn't this be more important than we seem to keep making it, as I absolutely fail to understand why ANY new version of Puppy is needed IF the old ones aren't finally FIXED!
And PLEASE no more 200 page threads needing analyzing to find the bugfixes
WE CAN do it BETTER!
James C wrote:The basis for some of the above has been in place since the "Deep Thought" 4.20 days.Worked pretty well for WhoDo and crew.jonyo wrote:no it is fully posted one page backpuppyluvr wrote:Kello,
Please clarify, as the only post by Aitch I find in this thread, is a link.Bug fixing/tracking.....
Is it POSSIBLE to at least devise a list, if not a small database, of
1/ bugs,
2/ pending/fixed status, and
3/ whether the fix is a patch,
4/ modifying some code,
5/ an addition, or whatever,
6/ how many testers have checked, and
7/ if any new errors arise, etc, and
8/ whether finally signed off, or not
Shouldn't this be more important than we seem to keep making it, as I absolutely fail to understand why ANY new version of Puppy is needed IF the old ones aren't finally FIXED!
And PLEASE no more 200 page threads needing analyzing to find the bugfixes
WE CAN do it BETTER!
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/index.php?f=40
Each "bug" in its own thread, status, etc. Another section just for "usability issues" as well.....
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/index.php?f=41
Some of us have already been there and done that,the base is there if anyone chooses to use it in the future.
WhoDo wrote:Ummm... when I coordinated 4.2x development we had a wiki page(s) devoted to tasks and assignments. That didn't stop some people from whining that their suggestions weren't implemented. Some people don't get that sometimes their suggestions are just impossible to implement, or plain crap! That didn't stop us from trying, of course, but nothing short of complete capitulation would satisfy some people and that doesn't sit well with VOLUNTEERS! Wake up and smell the coffee, jonyo, or at the very least use Wellminded to research the Puppy history you seem hell-bent on repeating! Doh, indeed!
Right on! Too bad those like jonyo only criticize and do nothing to help, only berate those like WhoDo who have really made a difference with positive contributions.WhoDo wrote:. . . .Ho hum. Ho hum. It was fun deja vuing this thread but it's become so boring now. Scunny Rob was at least creative in his ideas, even if he had no intention of ever lifting a finger to help implement them on a practical level. *sigh* The quality of dissenters around here has definitely declined.
And how could a humour-less foreigner be expected to tell the difference between these difficult, yet appropriate, nouns of latin origin (?); rectitude - rectumdude?WhoDo wrote:Certainty is no guarantee of rectitude! You heard it here first!puppyite wrote:This should demonstrate my level of commitment to what I have said: Even if every member of this forum filed through here and voiced their opposition I would still believe that good governance is needed, that’s how certain I am that what I propose is right.
Nope. I made my cullinary masterpieces, put them on the table for the hungry to enjoy and then hung up my apron. I just got tired of the whining and bored with the ill-informed excuses for not helping out in the Out house that accompanied it. I'm still in the Out house helping out those who want to create their own flavours. Enjoyed your analogy though, unoriginal as it was.jonyo wrote:heh, if it's too hot in the oven get outa the Out house
Oh, I doubt it!MinHundHettePerro wrote:And how could a humour-less foreigner be expected to tell the difference between these difficult, yet appropriate, nouns of latin origin (?); rectitude - rectumdude?
An even lower watermark reached by MHHP, the punctuating foreigner, completely lacking a sense of humour .............. / MHHP
Whose "truth", jonyo? Yours? Or did you intend to say "the Truth"? I'm not enough of a gnostic to claim I know what the latter is, though I dare so I probably couldn't handle it if I did!jonyo wrote:whodo you can't handle the truth
Because it's ill-mannered and insulting! Playdayz was the project coordinator! He made ALL of the decisions on policy, direction and inclusions. Yes, Mick was the lead developer. He did a great job! Playdayz was the driver - ultimate arbiter or dictator if you prefer - and he DID take on board each and every suggestion. Some people just cannot accept that NO is also an answer!!!puppyite wrote:Oh really, then why hasn't this been answered.puppyluvr wrote: I assure you, I`m not being "dim"...
Read the "Official Lupu 5.25" thread....
Tell me Playdayz didnt bend over backwards...
In spades, Jay! Apparently Rob left Scunny when someone made him a better offer!puppyluvr wrote:@ Warren......deja-vu????
It is kinda funny... Talk is one thing...But where is "Rob" now??? LMAO...
That's the problem, it's not organised at all your Majesty, it's just a cluster f^uck, with Royalty like yourself passing down decrees.WhoDo wrote:Not with Puppy! Like it, build your own or leave it! There's enough choice in there for most people except the organisers who want things organised THEIR way. Things are already organised the PUPPY way! That's good enough for most of us.
And I guess I was too demanding when I said "Thank you for your reply".WhoDo wrote:Because it's ill-mannered and insulting!puppyite wrote:Oh really, then why hasn't this been answered.puppyluvr wrote: I assure you, I`m not being "dim"...
Read the "Official Lupu 5.25" thread....
Tell me Playdayz didnt bend over backwards...
Right, mate. You post a reply on a thread in a forum, and just 6+ hrs later you indignantly ask why there hasn't been a response yet!!!puppyite wrote:Oh really, then why hasn't this been answered.puppyluvr wrote: I assure you, I`m not being "dim"...
Read the "Official Lupu 5.25" thread....
Tell me Playdayz didnt bend over backwards...
/ MHHP
