If the newer version will work, all the better.webmayo wrote:Maybe one day I will finish it.
1.3.2 is fine as it is, now that I can find and replace.
Sheldon
If the newer version will work, all the better.webmayo wrote:Maybe one day I will finish it.
It's still there. I moved to a new server and I was in the process of rebuilding the GenScriber website.6502coder wrote:It looks like RtfEdit is no longer an option for people seeking a lightweight RTF editor for Linux.
Thank you, Les Hardy.webmayo wrote:The current download is version 1.4.
http://www.genscriber.com/genapps/gensc ... /rtfeditor
Would someone give me some feedback on this version. I have not tested it on Puppy.
Abiword on my system could not display it at all. It was just a black bar.6502coder wrote:
When it appeared, the font setting in RtfEdit had changed to serif 10. The line of text was displayed in a tiny SERIF font, such that the whole line was just under 2 inches long.
Because it was saved as superscript.I then opened "test3.rtf" in TextMaker, where it looked very similar, but slightly longer at about 2.5 inches long, in a tiny sans-serif font. TextMaker's font tool claimed that that the text was in DejaVu Sans 10, but the text was clearly smaller than it appeared in "test2.rtf", which was created in TextMaker with the font set to DejaVu Sans 10.
Still in superscript.I then opened "test3.rtf" in Abiword. The results were much the same as with TextMaker -- a line of text a bit over 2.5 inches long, which Abiword's font tool said was in DejaVu Sans 10, but which is clearly in type smaller than what you get when you create a new Abiword document in DejaVu Sans 10.
No problems between abiword and rtfed on my system.Finally, I repeated the whole test, the only difference being that this time I used Abiword to create the original "test2.rtf" file. Same results.
The rtf file you supplied in the download was not a standard rtf. On my system, Abiword did not display the tables correctly.The borders on the tables are simple thin lines around each cell. When I opened one of these documents in RtfEdit, I found that the border lines were missing, or least not visible.
I would imagine Jarte does produce standard rtf. I really don't know I have never used it. I was referring to the actual file you uploaded.6502coder wrote:@webmayo
It's interesting that you say that the RTF file with the table was not a standard RTF. This file was created in Jarte, and since Jarte is built on the MS Wordpad engine I have always assumed that Jarte files would have a very high degree of compliance with the RTF standard.
Yes, I can confirm the errors in the report. Somewhere along the way I must have introduced the bug. Strange thing is, this is the version I have used myself, and the only difference is I compiled it with later libraries.6502coder wrote:Did some further testing with the new 1.4.4
Test report and files are in the ZIP