You cited those claims as "proof" of your claims, so you get to defend those claims. No one forced you to present those as your purported proof...musher0 wrote:As I said, take it out on the proper persons in the proper organizations, send your criticisms to them, don't use me as a punching bag.RetroTechGuy wrote: NASA is apparently unaware that the IPCC said this:How unfortunate for NASA that at least some of the scientists involved in the IPCC recognize the validity of Beer's Law. NASA is blithely unaware...Code: Select all
For CO2, part of the main 15 micron band is saturated over quite short vertical distances, so that some of the upwelling radiation reaching the lower stratosphere originates from the cold upper troposphere. When the CO2 concentration is increased, the increase in absorbed radiation is quite small and increased emission leads to a cooling at all heights in the stratosphere.
(...)
Take as much paper as you need.
Indeed! How curious that you instead rally behind falsehoods that violate known Laws of science.musher0 wrote:Rally Behind the Science!
But y'know, when I was a little kid the snow was waist deep -- now it's only knee deep... SOMETHING must has changed... Hahahaha...
BTW, some posts back you mentioned that you are not a scientist. My degrees are in the sciences -- Physics.
Now if only you supported the sciences as robustly as you defend your political agendas... I know where believers in this religion are taking this agenda.
Rest of the silliness skipped.