Pbackup 3.1.9-1

Miscellaneous tools
Message
Author
GeoffS
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri 24 Feb 2006, 08:39
Location: Australia

#141 Post by GeoffS »

Zigbert
Don't despair, we've all been there trying to test our own programs. Users - ugh!! the first key they press will be the one you never tried :lol: .
Just thought I'd post this to encourage you. I am sure there are others following the saga of 'pbackup' . I've tried most versions, had a few problems, mainly of my own making.
It has become a VERY useful program. Keep up the good work.
Geoff

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#142 Post by zigbert »

Version 2.4.0 is uploaded. See main post.

User avatar
veronicathecow
Posts: 559
Joined: Sat 21 Oct 2006, 09:41

#143 Post by veronicathecow »

Hi Zigbert, my apologies for not being around for a while but a combination of computer problems and lack of cash means that I am having to spend my time doing my book business and sorting out my VERY late Tax. Many thanks for your hard work and I hope to be back helping in what way I can in a few weeks and I'm sorry for letting you down.
All the best
Tony

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#144 Post by zigbert »

veronicathecow wrote:sorry for letting you down.
Don't be sorry. If you were paid for testing, I would expect something. Free software needs free people.

See you around

Sigmund

PaulBx1
Posts: 2312
Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2006, 03:11
Location: Wyoming, USA

#145 Post by PaulBx1 »

Hello Sigmund, just ran into something with version 1.9.7. I don't know if you've dealt with it already, this is a rather long thread to be searching through, to find out!

I am backing up my hard drive (/initrd/mnt/dev_save) to a USB hard drive. This time it said my backup was 55 days old. When I finished, I looked in the save set and found it looked all right, had everything I expected, except one thing: my pup_save file which is stored on the hard drive. I can manually copy it over there, but I expect pbackup to include that in the save set. Or am I wrong?

I wonder if it is not including it because it is an open file, or something like that? Or if it may be written during the backup and changed right in the middle?

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#146 Post by zigbert »

I'll take a look at it.

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#147 Post by zigbert »

PaulBx1
I made a test with a full backup in Pbackup 2.4.0 on Puppy 2.16. pup_save was included in the backup. This was a internal harddrive, but since they are handled the same way as usb-disks in Pbackup, I don't think that should be any problem.

Sigmund

User avatar
esmourguit
Posts: 1410
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006, 14:45
Location: Entre l'ile aux oiseaux.et l'ile de sainte Lucie

#148 Post by esmourguit »

Bonjour Sigmund, :wink:
I am translating in french, i'll send you, when it is finished.
Cordialement. :D
JJ M
[url=http://moulinier.net/][color=blue][b]Toutou Linux[/b][/color][/url] - [url=http://toutoulinux.free.fr/pet.php][color=blue][b]Paquets français[/b][/color][/url]

PaulBx1
Posts: 2312
Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2006, 03:11
Location: Wyoming, USA

#149 Post by PaulBx1 »

OK Sigmund, I'm now using Puppy 216 with the stock (2.0.0) pbackup, and it does back up the pup_save. Good...

However I noticed another bug. :)

I told it to exclude /initrd/mnt/dev_save/*.sfs since I can get all of them online and they take some room. When I did this it made a list of my current .sfs files. But, when I did the backup it backed them all up anyway. The exclude did work when I asked it to exclude a particular file, like the windows swap file.

There are two bugs here. The first is that it backed them up; the second is that it evaluated *.sfs right then when I entered the exclude request. It should not be evaluated until execution time (in my opinion) because if I add another .sfs file to my hard drive, I also don't want that one backed up (during a future backup).

I looked through your changelog, and didn't see anything like this. I haven't tested 2.4.0 though; I suppose next time I back up I will try your latest.

Of course, it is less bad to back up something I don't want, than to not back up something I do want. :wink:

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#150 Post by zigbert »

PaulBx1
I don't follow you. :oops:
How did you manage to exclude with regular expression???
The field 'Exclude from backup' is not writeable. Did you write in the 'file-selection-dialog'. That is not possible in the last version.

The 'Exclude from backup' field should only contain directories or files that should be excluded.

Here is something that should be cleared. Please help me.

(Did you see the link to Hitterdal. Use buttons + and - to zoom. Røros is the nearest town.)

Sigmund

PaulBx1
Posts: 2312
Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2006, 03:11
Location: Wyoming, USA

#151 Post by PaulBx1 »

Well, the 2.0.0 version took my "*.sfs" but I guess it doesn't work that way with 2.4.0, so problem solved. I guess you are saying each entry in that list is just an individual file (or directory?)

Thanks for the info on Hiterdal. I passed it on to my sister, who said she would dig into it when she got around to it!

PaulBx1
Posts: 2312
Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2006, 03:11
Location: Wyoming, USA

#152 Post by PaulBx1 »

Sigmund, 2.4.0 is not working for me. I did a full backup a few days ago, now when I want to backup again, it acts like I never did that backup and it wants to start with 1970 again. And it wants to come from /root, not /initrd/mnt/dev_save like I selected earlier. All I want to back up are the files since that backup a few days ago.

It's like the default job is the default that you selected, rather than what I changed in it. Like the job, with my changes, never got saved.

I might go back to 2.0.1, which was simpler and seemed to work better. I don't need jobs, just a simple backup that works all the time and really is a "one button backup".

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#153 Post by zigbert »

PaulBx1
To me, version 2.4.0 works stable and faster than 2.0.1. I really want to find out what went wrong with your try. And please report if somebody else finds it unstable.

You have a point about the jobs. It is not that you need to concern about jobs, but they might confuse user to think so. If you just don't bother about the jobs, it is still a one button backup, but gui should be more clear. I just haven't got the good idea. The job field also hold info about last backup, even if you only use the 'default' job.
I did a full backup a few days ago, now when I want to backup again, it acts like I never did that backup and it wants to start with 1970 again. And it wants to come from /root, not /initrd/mnt/dev_save like I selected earlier.
Choosing full backup, will allways set date to 1970. Choosing 'Backup recent files', it will set 1970 first time, and later the date of last backup. But why it still says /root/, is a bit harder. First thought is: Did you uncheck 'Save settings and status for job - default' in the finishbox. This could mislead user to think "I do not want jobs, so I uncheck this" ..... I did a test of the default job (changed settings and made backup. Next run settings were updated). Be aware that version 2.4.0 uses other config files than version 2.0.1, so settings will not follow an upgrade.

Sigmund

PaulBx1
Posts: 2312
Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2006, 03:11
Location: Wyoming, USA

#154 Post by PaulBx1 »

Choosing full backup, will allways set date to 1970. Choosing 'Backup recent files', it will set 1970 first time, and later the date of last backup.
I was always using 'Backup recent files'.

It is strange, now when I open pbackup it shows two jobs, 'default' (which it says was not used) and 'Normal', one I created when I had the problem earlier (and it says 'Success'). It also now acts properly, not going back to 1970.

I certainly did use the default job the first time, but for some reason it appears it did not register. It's possible I made a mistake somewhere, or I'm not remembering the sequence of events correctly, but I do have the saveset out there.

Oh, well, it's working now, so I will stick with it.

PaulBx1
Posts: 2312
Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2006, 03:11
Location: Wyoming, USA

#155 Post by PaulBx1 »

Sigmund, sorry to be a nag, :roll: but 2.4.0 is still not backing up my pup_save. It backed it up when I selected "full backup", but not this last time with "backup recent files".

This is 3 days after my full backup. The pup_save certainly did change in that time; e.g. emails.

The backup did pick up other files that have changed there. I am backing up from /initrd/mnt/dev_save.

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#156 Post by zigbert »

PaulBx1 wrote:Sigmund, sorry to be a nag
Please, be a nag. I want this to be useful.

I will do some testing...

Sigmund

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#157 Post by zigbert »

PaulBx1
The answer is rather simple. Pup_save.sfs is not a ordinary file, but a filesystem. This means that is get its date when it is made, and not later when changes are made inside. To backup files inside a filesystem, you have to backup from the mountpoint, which is / for pup_save.sfs. To only take a backup of this filesystem, it will be necessary to exclude /mnt/ which are the common mountpoint for other filesystems.

Hope this will help you.

Sigmund

PaulBx1
Posts: 2312
Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2006, 03:11
Location: Wyoming, USA

#158 Post by PaulBx1 »

You're right, the pup_save.2fs file does not have a recent date on it.

Your work-around would be a pain though. I'm wondering how restores would work, etc. Really, I just want to back up the pup_save file without digging into its guts. Seems like the time for a feature request: along with our "exclude" list we need an "always include" list... :)

To go along with that, we need at least wildcards (if not the full regular expressions) so I can tell it to always include *.2fs and *.3fs and exclude *.sfs. :D

User avatar
Gekko
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat 22 Jul 2006, 09:57
Location: Sydney, New South Wales

#159 Post by Gekko »

Is there a command line option for this?

User avatar
zigbert
Posts: 6621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:13
Location: Valåmoen, Norway
Contact:

#160 Post by zigbert »

Gekko
The only available commandline option is -q (quiet), which Pbackup uses for scheduled backups.

Sigmund

Post Reply