The Official Release of Lucid 5.25 (Lucid Five Twenty-Five)

A home for all kinds of Puppy related projects
Post Reply
Message
Author
stu90

#101 Post by stu90 »

Frugal install
Tested Boxee & stellarium sfs loaded with sfs_load-0.9 fine - watched a couple of hours / episodes of 'The Planets' on youtube (well worth watching)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyPqe1UiY5A
Made this little GUI to add/change DNS servers
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=65339

Over all luci 251 is working great here, not encountered any more bugs in my usage.

cheers.

User avatar
bigpup
Posts: 13886
Joined: Sun 11 Oct 2009, 18:15
Location: S.C. USA

#102 Post by bigpup »

playdayz wrote:
Could I suggest,
Give us at least two weeks to check out Luci 252.
I just get deep into trying to break it and you come out with a new version.
Give my CD burner a break and let me cool it off!
If this has the latest changes to the upgrade process, need to really work it on updating frugal installs. That is suppose to be fixed now!
I am not sure about two whole weeks, but we definitely want to give it a good going-over. I think 520 was pretty clean, and it would be nice to get the rep for very clean releases! Possibly there will not be a lot of problems, so more than 5-7 days might be wasted in that case. And yes, we need to test frugal upgrades. Thanks for all of your help.
Maybe with next one, point out what you are not sure will work or what really needs hard testing.
Keep in mind that we get limited time off from the boss (WIFE) that we all work for. Also a lot of programs to tryout.

scsijon
Posts: 1596
Joined: Thu 24 May 2007, 03:59
Location: the australian mallee
Contact:

#103 Post by scsijon »

playdayz wrote:
Could I suggest,
Give us at least two weeks to check out Luci 252.
I just get deep into trying to break it and you come out with a new version.
Give my CD burner a break and let me cool it off!
If this has the latest changes to the upgrade process, need to really work it on updating frugal installs. That is suppose to be fixed now!
I am not sure about two whole weeks, but we definitely want to give it a good going-over. I think 520 was pretty clean, and it would be nice to get the rep for very clean releases! Possibly there will not be a lot of problems, so more than 5-7 days might be wasted in that case. And yes, we need to test frugal upgrades. Thanks for all of your help.
What about waiting a week, to cover basic problems,

if none appear that require an update to happen !then,

then give it a second week to allow "puppy people" to test much deeper to pickup the "wandering" problem,

and only then do a final release candidate.

just a thought

scsijon

User avatar
bigpup
Posts: 13886
Joined: Sun 11 Oct 2009, 18:15
Location: S.C. USA

#104 Post by bigpup »

Very easy to follow visual guide to wireless connection setup in Lupu 520.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=65346

User avatar
yarddog
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon 30 Nov 2009, 23:00
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA

Luci 251 - The Most Leading-Edge Lucid Ever

#105 Post by yarddog »

PaulBx1 wrote:I actually submitted a bug, 636433, that is only fixed in 1.10.13 (caused incorrect calculations in my ballistics spreadsheet). I'm wondering too, what is the procedure for getting that change, since no Puppy currently has that version. I have Lupu 511, I wonder if someone has compiled 1.10.13 and put it into an Ubuntu repository somewhere? Couldn't find anything...
could someone compile gnumeric 1.10.13 and include in lucid pet packages - this would solve one of the problems stated above

regards
yarddog

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#106 Post by playdayz »

actually submitted a bug, 636433, that is only fixed in 1.10.13 (caused incorrect calculations in my ballistics spreadsheet). I'm wondering too, what is the procedure for getting that change, since no Puppy currently has that version. I have Lupu 511, I wonder if someone has compiled 1.10.13 and put it into an Ubuntu repository somewhere? Couldn't find anything...


could someone compile gnumeric 1.10.13 and include in lucid pet packages -
I sent this to ttuuxxx since he compiled the 1.10.12 that we are using in Lucid 5.2.

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#107 Post by playdayz »

actually submitted a bug, 636433, that is only fixed in 1.10.13 (caused incorrect calculations in my ballistics spreadsheet). I'm wondering too, what is the procedure for getting that change, since no Puppy currently has that version. I have Lupu 511, I wonder if someone has compiled 1.10.13 and put it into an Ubuntu repository somewhere? Couldn't find anything...

could someone compile gnumeric 1.10.13 and include in lucid pet packages -
yarddog, This is a quick and dirty "fix." If it is a fix. Natty uses 1.10.13 and these are the natty files for gnumeric. It runs for me in luci-252. Perhaps you could test the fix for your bug--but be warned that even if it fixes that bug there might be other bugs but it is something to try.
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/dis ... ucid52.pet

Jades
Posts: 466
Joined: Sat 07 Aug 2010, 22:07
Location: Somewhere in Blighty.
Contact:

251 does not work AT ALL on K6 2 500

#108 Post by Jades »

I've just tried an upgrade from a fresh Live-CD install of Luci-250 to 251 on the K6 2 500 machine and it did a kernel panic on boot. I've also tried to Live-CD boot on a pfix=ram startup and in both cases it kernel panics at the stage of performing a 'switch root' to the layered filesystem.

I see while typing this that you have now brought out Luci-252. Will you please slow down the rate of releases because you are making it virtually impossible for proper testing and feedback to be done.

I am increasingly suspecting that the root cause of the problems on K6 2 systems from Lupu versions newer than 511 is that you are using Ubuntu binaries direct from the mainstream and that all which are from versions newer than Lucid Lynx LTS are i686 or higher only.

Other than the reported issue with sound, Luci-250 seemed to load OK on the brief testing I did. Didn't check all of the apps, however.
Last edited by Jades on Tue 01 Mar 2011, 22:56, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#109 Post by James C »

Did a manual upgrade of the frugal install on the old P4 test box from 251 to 252.Upgrade went well other than the desktop icons being messed up which was an easy fix.
Initial boot after upgrade still had JWM,my preferred wallpaper and Pwidgets just as they had been in 251. All previously installed pets are still in place and working.The only thing changed before the screenshot was to fix the icons.
Looking good.

Going to upgrade a full install from 520 to 252 next.

User avatar
ttuuxxx
Posts: 11171
Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
Contact:

#110 Post by ttuuxxx »

I'm working on the Gnumeric issue.
ttuuxxx
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#111 Post by James C »

Already upgraded a full install on the old P4 test box from 520 to Luci 252.Same result,everything working and the only little problem was the messed up icons.All previously installed pets are still working....Pwidgets, Chromium , SeaMonkey,VLC etc..
Just need to change the wallpaper.... :lol:
Attachments
luci-252.png
(167.59 KiB) Downloaded 1037 times

User avatar
sszindian
Posts: 807
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2010, 02:14
Location: Pennsylvania U.S.

Kernel Panic !!!

#112 Post by sszindian »

Jades:

I had the same issue (kernel panic) with 250, 251 but with 252 it appears (so far) to be OK! (I'm writing this on 252). Even did a shutdown and reboot.

I didn't mention this earlier as I thought the problem might be me or my HD or something, and no one else seemed to experience the problem however, give 252 a shot and see if it 'repairs itself' like mine did!

On the 252 itself... I thought there would be some more new features like 1mick0 put in his new Spup but I guess this is moving twards the next release at too much a super pace so myself, I probably won't ask (or push) for anything like I did on 520 :)

Still glad to test though!

>>>---Indian------>

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#113 Post by playdayz »

On the 252 itself... I thought there would be some more new features like 1mick0 put in his new Spup but I guess this is moving twards the next release at too much a super pace so myself, I probably won't ask (or push) for anything like I did on 520 Smile
Name those features please sszindian. If 01micko has implemented them then he might help us as always. But you are right that mainly we are going for updates here.

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#114 Post by playdayz »

Did a manual upgrade of the frugal install on the old P4 test box from 251 to 252.Upgrade went well other than the desktop icons being messed up which was an easy fix.
JamesC, For the messed up icons, can you use DeskSetup Icon Templates to make a template of how you want them, and then after the upgrade you can use the program and the template to reset them?

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#115 Post by playdayz »

am increasingly suspecting that the root cause of the problems on K6 2 systems from Lupu versions newer than 511 is that you are using Ubuntu binaries direct from the mainstream and that all which are from versions newer than Lucid Lynx LTS are i686 or higher only.
Yes. I agree. I am wondering whether we might not should go ahead and say that, and recommend Wary and Lucid 5.1.1 for older computers. This time I think there might be too many "new" packages and binaries to try to sort it out. It appears that Ubuntu is doing the same thing--which makes it mainstream I guess.

I thought a K6 *was* an i686 cpu--but now I think there must be some difference.

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#116 Post by James C »

playdayz wrote:
Did a manual upgrade of the frugal install on the old P4 test box from 251 to 252.Upgrade went well other than the desktop icons being messed up which was an easy fix.
JamesC, For the messed up icons, can you use DeskSetup Icon Templates to make a template of how you want them, and then after the upgrade you can use the program and the template to reset them?
Before both upgrades I had been using the minimal icons.The upgrades apparently put all the default icons on top which made a mess. :)
I simply, in both cases, went to Desksetup Icon Templates,made sure that minimal was checked and the original minmal icons were back when X was restarted. Easy enough.

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#117 Post by playdayz »

Will you please slow down the rate of releases because you are making it virtually impossible for proper testing and feedback to be done.
Yes. As it says on the first page, Luci-252 is up for at least a week.

Here was my thinking: Once people found a certain number of bugs and fixes I would implement them in the next version. I thought there was no use making people view the same old bugs, rather take a step forward.. It might not have been comfortable for everyone but it has seemed to work OK.

User avatar
ttuuxxx
Posts: 11171
Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
Contact:

#118 Post by ttuuxxx »

playdayz wrote:
actually submitted a bug, 636433, that is only fixed in 1.10.13 (caused incorrect calculations in my ballistics spreadsheet). I'm wondering too, what is the procedure for getting that change, since no Puppy currently has that version. I have Lupu 511, I wonder if someone has compiled 1.10.13 and put it into an Ubuntu repository somewhere? Couldn't find anything...


could someone compile gnumeric 1.10.13 and include in lucid pet packages -
I sent this to ttuuxxx since he compiled the 1.10.12 that we are using in Lucid 5.2.
hi playdayz I had a look at the latest gnumeric, and well the backend is too old. Requested 'libgoffice-0.8 >= 0.8.10' but version of libGOffice is 0.8.1
Requested 'libgsf-1 >= 1.14.18' but version of libgsf-1 is 1.14.16

even when I revert the numbers to the Luci 5.2 version numbers it compiles for a bit and then gets errors and stops, when I fix the errors, I get more and more etc.
Well you decide, if you want the other 2 libs libgoffice, libgsf I could compile the newer ones and add system links to the older release numbers and see how it goes
ttuuxxx
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)

Jim1911
Posts: 2460
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 20:39
Location: Texas, USA

#119 Post by Jim1911 »

James C wrote:Already upgraded a full install on the old P4 test box from 520 to Luci 252.Same result,everything working and the only little problem was the messed up icons.All previously installed pets are still working....Pwidgets, Chromium , SeaMonkey,VLC etc..
Just need to change the wallpaper.... :lol:
Do you have to rename anything to do a full installation upgrade? It seems unusual that you can upgrade from 520 to 252.

User avatar
playdayz
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri 25 Apr 2008, 18:57

#120 Post by playdayz »

hi playdayz I had a look at the latest gnumeric, and well the backend is too old. Requested 'libgoffice-0.8 >= 0.8.10' but version of libGOffice is 0.8.1
Requested 'libgsf-1 >= 1.14.18' but version of libgsf-1 is 1.14.16
even when I revert the numbers to the Luci 5.2 version numbers it compiles for a bit and then gets errors and stops, when I fix the errors, I get more and more etc.
Well you decide, if you want the other 2 libs libgoffice, libgsf I could compile the newer ones and add system links to the older release numbers and see how it goes
ttuuxxx
Yeah, This is what I mean by Lucid being stretched about as far as it can be stretched.
Well you decide, if you want the other 2 libs libgoffice, libgsf I could compile the newer ones and add system links to the older release numbers and see how it goes
Let's give it a try if you don't mind--it could affect Abiword I think, but maybe we'll get lucky. Let's stop if it turns into a hassle. ;-) Thanks.

Post Reply