sure, if you stop checking for systemd at pid 2. devuan 2.0 has more of it than devuan 1.0.anikin wrote:As a matter of fact, that's happenned already.
wrong. sysvinit isnt a requirement. that happens to be what it uses right now. unless theyve recently changed and decided its going to be sysvinit officially.The goal of Devuan was and still is very simple - to keep the traditional sysVinit
that is a primary goal, they have other goals.not use the new systemd init.
it is fairly trivial to run debian without systemd as pid 1 and devuan does exist to accomplish more than that. the init is only part of it.
no, its not. and if you look at the things they consider bugs and the things they considered bugs, and try to fix-- its about far more than that.Devuan hasn't moved a millimeter away from that orginal goal. It's all about init!
but they are indeed backpedalling about whats acceptable. im sure the changes in what they say have no bearing on what you think their goals are, but what you think their goals are has nothing to do with what theyve said in mailing lists and irc for the past 3 years.
oh, sorry, debian 8 couldnt mount a vfat usb after installation without a reboot, even when the module was loaded, rmmod, modprobed. i thought it was windows! but thats just one example of the huge compromise in quality and reliability between debian 7 and 8.These are absolutely baseless and insulting claims. Debian is rock solid. It doesn't break.
debian was rock solid, but why would you need to REBOOT to get something as basic as the already-loaded vfat filesystem module to work? thats not even debian, but thats what they did to it. before 8, i considered debian probably the best operating system in the world. but it isnt now.
so by "baseless" you mean you dont agree, thats fine, whatever.
they should pay you, or you should run for office.Devuan isn't a mess - it's tightly and professionally run operation.