Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

[linuxcbon]

Hi,

I benchmarked some browsers with their latest versions.
I tested them on my old PC with xenialpup 64.
These benchmarks measure the speed.

http://dromaeo.com/?v8
PALEMOON 28.0.0 average score 665 runs/s (Total)
PALEMOON 27.9.2 average score 471 runs/s (Total)
SEAMONKEY 2.49.1 average score 694 runs/s (Total)
FIREFOX 60.0.1 average score 658 runs/s (Total)
CHROME 67.0.3396.62 score 626 runs/s (Total)
MIDORI 0.5.11 score 454 runs/s (Total)
QUPZILLA 1.8.9 score 474 runs/s (Total)
GNOME WEB 3.18.11 score 741 runs/s (Total)

https://web.basemark.com/
PALEMOON 28.0.0 score 133
PALEMOON 27.9.2 score 87
SEAMONKEY 2.49.1 score 122
FIREFOX 60.0.1 score 126
CHROME 67.0.3396.62 score 136
MIDORI 0.5.11 score 51
QUPZILLA 1.8.9 score 0 (FAILED)
GNOME WEB 3.18.11 score 53

https://browserbench.org/MotionMark/
PALEMOON 28.0.0 score 66
PALEMOON 27.9.2 score 52
SEAMONKEY 2.49.1 score 54
FIREFOX 60.0.1 score 73
CHROME 67.0.3396.62 score 104
MIDORI 0.5.11 score 0 (FAILED)
QUPZILLA 1.8.9 score 0 (FAILED)
GNOME WEB 3.18.11 score 87

Conclusion : Chrome and Firefox are the fastest.
Palemoon is second, getting close to them.

Can please you do these tests and give us the results here ?
(ps : opera doesnt work in my xenialpup 64.)

Cheers

[s243a]

[linuxcbon]

[linuxcbon]

Updated test results with latest palemoon 28.0.0. You can see it's much faster and getting closer to firefox and chrome.

[Terry H]

Ran tests on Tazpup Beta 1 using Palemoon 28.0.0 (32 bit), on my Dell Laptop Corei3-5005U 8 GB RAM.

http://dromaeo.com/?v8
930.09

https://web.basemark.com/
Failed

https://browserbench.org/MotionMark/
95.41