| Author |
Message |
linuxcbon
Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 1235
|
 Posted: Thu 14 Jun 2018, 03:19 Post subject:
 Some browsers benchmarks (speed) |
|
Hi,
I tested some browsers on my old PC with xenialpup 64.
All tested with the same hardware, the same OS, same everything.
http://dromaeo.com/?v8
GNOME WEB (aka EPIPHANY) 3.18.11 average score 741 runs/s (Total)
SEAMONKEY 2.49.4 average score 715 runs/s (Total)
GOOGLE CHROME 72.0.3626.96 average score 700 runs/s (Total)
WATERFOX 56.2.7.1 average score 700 runs/s (Total)
PALEMOON 28.3.1 average score 690 runs/s (Total)
FIREFOX 65.0 average score 650 runs/s (Total)
VIVALDI 2.0.1309.37 average score 647 runs/s (Total)
OPERA 58.0.3135.53 average score 640 runs/s (Total)
SLIMJET crashes and doesn't start
https://browserbench.org/MotionMark/
OPERA 58.0.3135.53 average score 105
GNOME WEB 3.18.11 average score 87
GOOGLE CHROME 72.0.3626.96 average score 80
WATERFOX 56.2.7.1 average score 80
SEAMONKEY 2.49.4 average score 60
PALEMOON 28.3.1 average score 60
VIVALDI 2.0.1309.37 average score 57
FIREFOX 65.0 average score 25 (---> something is really wrong here with firefox, needs investigation)
SLIMJET crashes and doesn't start
Can please you compare different browsers in the same system ?
Cheers
ps : I try to keep this list updated with the latest browsers releases, that's why it's updated so many times.
Last edited by linuxcbon on Thu 07 Feb 2019, 15:19; edited 29 times in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
s243a
Joined: 02 Sep 2014
Posts: 1336
|
| Posted: Thu 14 Jun 2018, 03:28 Post subject:
Re: Some browsers benchmarks |
|
| linuxcbon wrote: | Hi,
Conclusion : Chrome and Firefox are the fastest.
Palemoon is SLOOOOWWW...
Can please you do these tests and give us the results here ?
(ps : opera doesnt work in my xenialpup 64.)
Cheers |
I'm guessing you either have a crap load of ram or didn't have that many javascript heavy tabs open.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
linuxcbon
Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 1235
|
| Posted: Thu 14 Jun 2018, 04:43 Post subject:
Re: Some browsers benchmarks |
|
| s243a wrote: | | I'm guessing you either have a crap load of ram or didn't have that many javascript heavy tabs open. |
I have 3GB RAM and only one tab open : the one with the tests.
Try it and tell us the results. 
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
linuxcbon
Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 1235
|
| Posted: Sat 18 Aug 2018, 22:07 Post subject:
|
|
Updated test results with latest palemoon 28.0.0. You can see it's much faster and getting closer to firefox and chrome.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Terry H
Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 540
Location: The Heart of Muskoka, ON Canada
|
| Posted: Sat 18 Aug 2018, 23:10 Post subject:
|
|
Ran tests on Tazpup Beta 1 using Palemoon 28.0.0 (32 bit), on my Dell Laptop Corei3-5005U 8 GB RAM.
http://dromaeo.com/?v8
930.09
https://web.basemark.com/
Failed
https://browserbench.org/MotionMark/
95.41
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
linuxcbon
Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 1235
|
| Posted: Fri 12 Oct 2018, 21:36 Post subject:
|
|
| Terry H wrote: | Ran tests on Tazpup Beta 1 using Palemoon 28.0.0 (32 bit), on my Dell Laptop Corei3-5005U 8 GB RAM.
http://dromaeo.com/?v8
930.09
https://web.basemark.com/
Failed
https://browserbench.org/MotionMark/
95.41 |
nice but you need to compare different browsers, because one browser alone doesn't mean anything.
The goal is to compare browsers.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
linuxcbon
Joined: 09 Aug 2007
Posts: 1235
|
| Posted: Mon 04 Feb 2019, 15:11 Post subject:
|
|
I just tested FIREFOX 65.0 , very disapointing speed when comparing to other browsers.
(ps : when testing, you must test different browsers , one after the other....
on the same os and same hardware, because one result alone doesnt mean nothing,
so you need to compare browsers with each others, like firefox against seamonkey against chrome against palemoon etc etc)
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index » Advanced Topics » Additional Software (PETs, n' stuff) » Browsers and Internet
