Author |
Message |
Bushbuck
Joined: 25 Jan 2013 Posts: 168
|
Posted: Sun 19 Mar 2017, 00:17 Post subject:
Tahr64 6.0.6? Subject description: Is this what I think? |
|
I noticed
tahr64-6.0.6-uefi.iso 2017-Feb-15 16:42:44 285.5M
tahr64-6.0.6-uefi.iso.md5.txt 2017-Feb-15 16:42:47 0.1K,
over in the
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/puppy-tahr directory
Index of /puppylinux/puppy-tahr/iso/tahrpup -6.0-CE/
Is that where it was meant to go? (because there's also an empty
Index of /puppylinux/puppy-tahr/iso/tahrpup64-6.0.6/ directory)
and,
Is it a UEFI-ed update of tahr64 6.0.5? That sounds very useful, just in case...
_________________ Tahr64 Puppy 6.0.5, Gigabyte motherboard, Intel i7 4770, 16GB RAM.
Still using Sony VAIO, 2008, with the same OS.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bigpup

Joined: 11 Oct 2009 Posts: 10318 Location: Charleston S.C. USA
|
Posted: Sun 19 Mar 2017, 03:43 Post subject:
|
|
666philb released Tahrpup64 6.0.6 for testing.
You can read about the release here:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=942485#942485
_________________ I have found, in trying to help people, that the things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected 
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Bushbuck
Joined: 25 Jan 2013 Posts: 168
|
Posted: Sun 19 Mar 2017, 11:55 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks, Bigpup.
_________________ Tahr64 Puppy 6.0.5, Gigabyte motherboard, Intel i7 4770, 16GB RAM.
Still using Sony VAIO, 2008, with the same OS.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Snail
Joined: 18 Oct 2009 Posts: 334
|
Posted: Sat 29 Jul 2017, 06:01 Post subject:
6.0.6 update Subject description: Status now? |
|
606 was announced in February 8, as a fairly minor update to 6053. The ISO has been copied from the testing subdirectory on Ibiblio but nothing has been announced officially, nearly 7 months later.
Some people have apparently been using it.
What is it's status now?
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rufwoof
Joined: 24 Feb 2014 Posts: 2263
|
Posted: Sat 29 Jul 2017, 09:07 Post subject:
|
|
6.0.5 ... very nice. Tried 6.0.6 test the other week (built from woofce)... ok, but not there yet.
As the Ubuntu Tahr (preferred/best) kernel has passed EoL and Tahr itself is that much closer to EoL, I guess that more development effort is perhaps being expended on Xenial? I tried 7.0.8.5 test the other day and that certainly did seem more along the road than Tahr 6.0.6.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rcrsn51

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 11889 Location: Stratford, Ontario
|
Posted: Sat 29 Jul 2017, 09:13 Post subject:
|
|
rufwoof wrote: | As the Ubuntu Tahr (preferred/best) kernel has passed EoL .... |
The Tahr series are able to accept a kernel-change to a newer version.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rufwoof
Joined: 24 Feb 2014 Posts: 2263
|
Posted: Sat 29 Jul 2017, 10:10 Post subject:
|
|
Very oddly, when I upgraded from the 3 series to a 4 series kernel, the fonts weren't as good (so I switched back). Seen that on a few different Pup's. Maybe my hardware is too old (10 years) that newer kernels don't support (or support differently). i.e. even Xenial Pup 7.0.8.x with its 4 series kernel ... the fonts aren't as nice as in Tahr 6.0.5. I've tried all-sorts of adjustments (hinting variations ...etc.). I even tried moving the fonts over from Tahr etc. Might be down to using a old 720p TV as a monitor (I should really have investigated further and swapped out the monitor etc. but at the time just switching back to a post EoL kernel was the easier choice).
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Limbomusic

Joined: 15 Apr 2016 Posts: 266 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Sat 29 Jul 2017, 12:39 Post subject:
tahr64_6.0.6 Subject description: is very good imho |
|
I just wanted to chime in and say that I really like the latest tahr64_6.0.6 - I managed to use woof and build a shiny fresh one
with the latest 4.9.30 kernel. And it seems .deb packages intall flawlessly and the old problem: "cups gets broken by chrome" is gone. I got my Brother LaserJet printer working on it today very easily. With latest chrome 59 already installed. (and no bitching about not being root)
When I first booted from the fresh iso tho - there were no .png s linked to any icons so everything was kinda raw - but I set up everything like I wanted - and installed latest chrome and then remastered (and copied the .chrome folder to /tmp/root before /root gets added) and also - (this I learned from Mike Walsh bless him) added a "silent-launch.desktop" (for chrome) in the autostart folder in .config with this text:
Quote: | [Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Type=Application
NoDisplay=true
Name=silent-launch
Exec=google-chrome --silent-launch & |
and it makes chrome start superfast (on my 5 year old generic but good gaming-pc)
Anyway - this is actually the fastest and most trouble-free
linux-puppy I have ever tried. It also works awesomly on my semi-new lenovo ideapad. (dual booted with win10)
In case anyone would care to try out my puplet its at
http://pissekult.com/linux/kjartans_puppy/64bits/kjartans_puppy64uefi.zip
Its for new pc s tho - with uefi boot
So u just unzip and copy all files to a fresh formatted usb drive (fat32) and boot from it.
(sorry - default settings set to norway - just choose your own
So uh - tahr64_6.0.6 rocks ! (MY world anyhoo)
Last edited by Limbomusic on Tue 15 Aug 2017, 15:09; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Limbomusic

Joined: 15 Apr 2016 Posts: 266 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Sat 29 Jul 2017, 13:20 Post subject:
suddenly Subject description: huh like |
|
huh. I sudenly read this:
NOTE: If you're trying to build 64-bit system, please make sure that
your own OS is 64-bit. You can't build 64-bit on 32-bit system.
On the other hand, 64-bit system will happily build 32-bit puppies.
from https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/tree/woof-next
I used an ancient Dell Vostro 1000 from 2005 to build my puplet
and I,m pretty sure it ran on tahr 6.0.5 32 bit - but still managed
to build a 64 bit tahr.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ozsouth
Joined: 01 Jan 2010 Posts: 301 Location: S.E Australia
|
Posted: Fri 04 Aug 2017, 12:09 Post subject:
Tahr606-64bit |
|
I started using it last week & made a wl driver (see Broadcom-STA posts). It also opens newer cameras. Like it.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Burn_IT

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 3021 Location: Tamworth UK
|
Posted: Sat 05 Aug 2017, 08:57 Post subject:
|
|
It is OK to build it on the "wrong" sysem as long as the "right" libraries are first in the search sequence.
_________________ "Just think of it as leaving early to avoid the rush" - T Pratchett
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|